Kapernick suing the nfl lol

[JoeMoma]

No one is saying there are not plenty of Americans that support this guy.
The point here is simply that bringing this guy onboard is going to create a wedge with your fan base. That is why up to now no owner wants him.
He's not a great QB. The downside of potential revenue loss outweighs any upside.

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

The 1st amendment will not be on trial. Kaepernick is still practicing his right to free speech. He does not have a 1st amendment right to play pro football.

But in this case, clearly a nexus has been established by Kaepernick's peaceful protest and his being denied employment by the NFL.
Whether collusion by NFL owners to punish Colin for his protest was the vehicle responsible for his estrangement remains to be seen. But in any event... there has to be some viable reason other than kneeling for the NA. In essence the NFL reps will posit they have the right to fire people for any reason without explanation. But we already know why Colin isn't playing...and public knowledge of that can't be sidestepped in court. The real test comes when stats show most Americans back Kaepernick...thereby undermining the premise
that his presence on the field could cause revenue to drop. That's a two way street. If Kaepernick backers boycott the NFL even more revenue would be lost.

Survey says Americans oppose NFL players being fired over protests

"Breaking the numbers down by party, there is a stark difference in the results. Republicans are 65%-34% in favor of firing players over protests while Democrats are 80%-19% opposed. Independents are 64%-35% opposed.

All age groups, except for 65+ are opposed, with 18-29 being the most against, 71%-28%.

Whites are 55%-43% opposed, blacks are 88%-12% opposed and Hispanics are 60%-38% opposed."

Should Kaepernick bring civil charges in California, chances are high the court may see things his way.

He wasn't fired! He is a free agent that was not picked up by a team. Not the same as being fired.

You're correct. I just used the term fired as a conveinience. But not being picked up is tantamount to being fired when you can't
pursue your livelihood.

Legally there is a huge difference.

 

[JQPublic1]

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

The 1st amendment will not be on trial. Kaepernick is still practicing his right to free speech. He does not have a 1st amendment right to play pro football.

But in this case, clearly a nexus has been established by Kaepernick's peaceful protest and his being denied employment by the NFL.
Whether collusion by NFL owners to punish Colin for his protest was the vehicle responsible for his estrangement remains to be seen. But in any event... there has to be some viable reason other than kneeling for the NA. In essence the NFL reps will posit they have the right to fire people for any reason without explanation. But we already know why Colin isn't playing...and public knowledge of that can't be sidestepped in court. The real test comes when stats show most Americans back Kaepernick...thereby undermining the premise
that his presence on the field could cause revenue to drop. That's a two way street. If Kaepernick backers boycott the NFL even more revenue would be lost.

Survey says Americans oppose NFL players being fired over protests

"Breaking the numbers down by party, there is a stark difference in the results. Republicans are 65%-34% in favor of firing players over protests while Democrats are 80%-19% opposed. Independents are 64%-35% opposed.

All age groups, except for 65+ are opposed, with 18-29 being the most against, 71%-28%.

Whites are 55%-43% opposed, blacks are 88%-12% opposed and Hispanics are 60%-38% opposed."

Should Kaepernick bring civil charges in California, chances are high the court may see things his way.

He wasn't fired! He is a free agent that was not picked up by a team. Not the same as being fired.

You're correct. I just used the term fired as a conveinience. But not being picked up is tantamount to being fired when you can't
pursue your livelihood.

Legally there is a huge difference.

Probably...

 

[monkrules]

There seems to be a growing numer of players and fans who support Kaepernick.
He may never play in the NFL again but he has started a movement that is gaining momentum. His cause is a noble one and worthy of national attention. Only a celebrity like him could have pulled it off.


No...but there is no evidence Colin's actions had that effect. Some fans lauded his bravery
while others gave him a thumbs down. When the dust clears..the possibility that only Rw white males will be seen at ball games looms as a game changer.

I suppose that would be cut and dry if the NFL didn't recieve huge subsidies at the taxpayer's expense. Doing so, In effect, sort of makes the NFL a government contractor. Even the stadiums they play in are built by local government tax dollars. So Colin may have some legal leeway to press them on a civil rights violation.

Colin Kaepernic is a highly educated person with excellent oratory skills. You look silly trying to use some urban dialect to demonstrate otherwise.

Well, I'd say you are one of few people who think highly of this whining drama queen. I still think he's a waste of skin and that won't change. Apparently lots of people agree with me, seeing that Colon is not wanted by any team.

T'is the cause he sacrificed his career for that stirs me to support him. Hidden there in are the voices of black ghosts past who lost their lives or made similar sacrifices in the struggle for equality. Colin's protest is an extension of that struggle.

Kaep’s career was in trouble BEFORE he started kneeling. He sacrificed nothing, he was not going to start he was a back up BEFORE he started kneeling.

He wanted to protest, the league was fine with it, they did nothing, he played the season, opted out of his $16 million contract and took the free agent route. Just because teams don’t want him, he has cooked up a scheme accusing the owners of collusion, he is a weak coward who can’t take responsibility for his play on the field.

JQ sure is a wind-up platitude generator, isn't he?

He is too stupid and too ignorant to figure out that free agency is all about skill set vs. contract, and that Kaep wants to be paid like a starter while playing like a scrub.

What G.M.in his right mind would overpay a scrub who is destructive to the clubhouse and who refers to them as a slave owner? I sure wouldn't if I were in that position. Heck, I'd take a flyer on RG3 LONG before Kaep, and you sure don't hear anybody talking about RG3 being blackballed.

Jq has a very limited level of intelligence and so reduces complex matters down to his own childish ability to comprehend. All that matters is color of skin to him and nothing more.

You're too stupid to know that Kaepernick has accomplished his goal of focusing national attention on killer cops and the corrupt system that supports them. He is the latest link in a succession of black athletes who sacrificed their careers and dared to buck the system using the media.

Colin knew the price to be paid for telling the truth and he was man enough to do it. Jerks like you will never understand the love this man is showing for his people. He could have gone on living the good life with is head in the sand; but, he chose instead to serve a better purpose.

The public is divided over Colin's protest.
Rw white males are vehemently against the protest and have interpreted it as an unAmerican gesture .But RW white males aren't the only Americans in this country.
You might think you are, but liberals including white women, blacks and others out number you. And, increasingly, they are rallying behind the man who ought to be known as "Constitutional Colin."

All you have are insults — because you’re too fucking stupid to see Colon is nothing but a whining, sickening, stinking, coward. His career was on the skids because he was always just a marginal player and THAT’s the ONLY reason the shithead started his drama queen routine.

He doesn’t care about black people (or anyone else), he’s just using them as a wedge to try and force some team owner to hire his worthless ass. He’s made himself a divisive figure who’s not worth having around because he causes more trouble than he’s worth. Team owners would have to be insane to hire Colon, all that would do is damage THEIR business. The only thing Colon loves is Colon, oh, yeah, and his raghead muslim girlfriend.

 

[monkrules]

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

This is NOT a First Ammendment issue. It's about a dumbass who thinks he should be able to protest when he should be working and acting like a professional. He made his decisions. So the screwup is on Colon. He cannot force other team owners to hire him. That's fucking laughable.

He's perfectly free to voice his opinions ON HIS OWN TIME, and off the field. If he doesn't want to work he should just go apply for welfare — I'm sure he'd be better at that than he is at football.

 

[monkrules]

No one is saying there are not plenty of Americans that support this guy.
The point here is simply that bringing this guy onboard is going to create a wedge with your fan base. That is why up to now no owner wants him.
He's not a great QB. The downside of potential revenue loss outweighs any upside.

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

The 1st amendment will not be on trial. Kaepernick is still practicing his right to free speech. He does not have a 1st amendment right to play pro football.

But in this case, clearly a nexus has been established by Kaepernick's peaceful protest and his being denied employment by the NFL.
Whether collusion by NFL owners to punish Colin for his protest was the vehicle responsible for his estrangement remains to be seen. But in any event... there has to be some viable reason other than kneeling for the NA. In essence the NFL reps will posit they have the right to fire people for any reason without explanation. But we already know why Colin isn't playing...and public knowledge of that can't be sidestepped in court. The real test comes when stats show most Americans back Kaepernick...thereby undermining the premise
that his presence on the field could cause revenue to drop. That's a two way street. If Kaepernick backers boycott the NFL even more revenue would be lost.

Survey says Americans oppose NFL players being fired over protests

"Breaking the numbers down by party, there is a stark difference in the results. Republicans are 65%-34% in favor of firing players over protests while Democrats are 80%-19% opposed. Independents are 64%-35% opposed.

All age groups, except for 65+ are opposed, with 18-29 being the most against, 71%-28%.

Whites are 55%-43% opposed, blacks are 88%-12% opposed and Hispanics are 60%-38% opposed."

Should Kaepernick bring civil charges in California, chances are high the court may see things his way.

He wasn't fired! He is a free agent that was not picked up by a team. Not the same as being fired.

You're correct. I just used the term fired as a conveinience. But not being picked up is tantamount to being fired when you can't
pursue your livelihood.

Colon is perfectly free to pursue his livelihood. But that does NOT mean other people owe him a living. If he can't make a living doing what he wants to do maybe it's time he chooses a field in which he's more competent, such as janitorial work, or flipping burgers.

No one is likely to pay Colon to be a professional whiner and THAT is really what this fool is trying to force teams to do.

 

[Papageorgio]

JQ sure is a wind-up platitude generator, isn't he?

He is too stupid and too ignorant to figure out that free agency is all about skill set vs. contract, and that Kaep wants to be paid like a starter while playing like a scrub.

What G.M.in his right mind would overpay a scrub who is destructive to the clubhouse and who refers to them as a slave owner? I sure wouldn't if I were in that position. Heck, I'd take a flyer on RG3 LONG before Kaep, and you sure don't hear anybody talking about RG3 being blackballed.

Jq has a very limited level of intelligence and so reduces complex matters down to his own childish ability to comprehend. All that matters is color of skin to him and nothing more.

You're too stupid to know that Kaepernick has accomplished his goal of focusing national attention on killer cops and the corrupt system that supports them. He is the latest link in a succession of black athletes who sacrificed their careers and dared to buck the system using the media.

Colin knew the price to be paid for telling the truth and he was man enough to do it. Jerks like you will never understand the love this man is showing for his people. He could have gone on living the good life with is head in the sand; but, he chose instead to serve a better purpose.

The public is divided over Colin's protest.
Rw white males are vehemently against the protest and have interpreted it as an unAmerican gesture .But RW white males aren't the only Americans in this country.
You might think you are, but liberals including white women, blacks and others out number you. And, increasingly, they are rallying behind the man who ought to be known as "Constitutional Colin."

No one is saying there are not plenty of Americans that support this guy.
The point here is simply that bringing this guy onboard is going to create a wedge with your fan base. That is why up to now no owner wants him.
He's not a great QB. The downside of potential revenue loss outweighs any upside.

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

The 1st amendment will not be on trial. Kaepernick is still practicing his right to free speech. He does not have a 1st amendment right to play pro football.

But in this case, clearly a nexus has been established by Kaepernick's peaceful protest and his being denied employment by the NFL.
Whether collusion by NFL owners to punish Colin for his protest was the vehicle responsible for his estrangement remains to be seen. But in any event... there has to be some viable reason other than kneeling for the NA. In essence the NFL reps will posit they have the right to fire people for any reason without explanation. But we already know why Colin isn't playing...and public knowledge of that can't be sidestepped in court. The real test comes when stats show most Americans back Kaepernick...thereby undermining the premise
that his presence on the field could cause revenue to drop. That's a two way street. If Kaepernick backers boycott the NFL even more revenue would be lost.

Survey says Americans oppose NFL players being fired over protests

"Breaking the numbers down by party, there is a stark difference in the results. Republicans are 65%-34% in favor of firing players over protests while Democrats are 80%-19% opposed. Independents are 64%-35% opposed.

All age groups, except for 65+ are opposed, with 18-29 being the most against, 71%-28%.

Whites are 55%-43% opposed, blacks are 88%-12% opposed and Hispanics are 60%-38% opposed."

Should Kaepernick bring civil charges in California, chances are high the court may see things his way.

Who has been fired? No one. The NFL doesn't have to hire anyone, he is demanding $10 million a year and you can get a back up QB for 2 million or less. He was having playing issues before he started kneeling, in fact he was already benched. So, you are making up crap and pretending that it is fact.

The stats mean nothing, when Kaep goes to court and he can't prove collusion then he might sign a $900,000 contract that he is actually worth.

 

[Papageorgio]

No one is saying there are not plenty of Americans that support this guy.
The point here is simply that bringing this guy onboard is going to create a wedge with your fan base. That is why up to now no owner wants him.
He's not a great QB. The downside of potential revenue loss outweighs any upside.

You might be right about what the owners think in terms of Kaepernick's marketability
but let him have his day in court. I am looking foward to it. The 1st ammendment will be on trial with Kaepernick.

The 1st amendment will not be on trial. Kaepernick is still practicing his right to free speech. He does not have a 1st amendment right to play pro football.

But in this case, clearly a nexus has been established by Kaepernick's peaceful protest and his being denied employment by the NFL.
Whether collusion by NFL owners to punish Colin for his protest was the vehicle responsible for his estrangement remains to be seen. But in any event... there has to be some viable reason other than kneeling for the NA. In essence the NFL reps will posit they have the right to fire people for any reason without explanation. But we already know why Colin isn't playing...and public knowledge of that can't be sidestepped in court. The real test comes when stats show most Americans back Kaepernick...thereby undermining the premise
that his presence on the field could cause revenue to drop. That's a two way street. If Kaepernick backers boycott the NFL even more revenue would be lost.

Survey says Americans oppose NFL players being fired over protests

"Breaking the numbers down by party, there is a stark difference in the results. Republicans are 65%-34% in favor of firing players over protests while Democrats are 80%-19% opposed. Independents are 64%-35% opposed.

All age groups, except for 65+ are opposed, with 18-29 being the most against, 71%-28%.

Whites are 55%-43% opposed, blacks are 88%-12% opposed and Hispanics are 60%-38% opposed."

Should Kaepernick bring civil charges in California, chances are high the court may see things his way.

He wasn't fired! He is a free agent that was not picked up by a team. Not the same as being fired.

You're correct. I just used the term fired as a conveinience. But not being picked up is tantamount to being fired when you can't
pursue your livelihood.

Why does the NFL owe Kaepernick a livelihood? Why should the NFL be forced to pay a back up QB 10 million? Just because someone doesn't give another person a job, they aren't denying that person anything. He has no right to be hire by the NFL. Your logic is not logical.

 

[boedicca]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

 

[boedicca]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

Entitlement attitude? Kneeling for the national anthem to protest police brutality is entitlement? Please connect the dots for me.

He thinks he's owed a job. He's not.

 

[Lewdog]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

 

[boedicca]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

No, that is not the complete story. The NFL has insulted its core audience, and the core audience is not too keen about it.

 

[Lewdog]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

No, that is not the complete story. The NFL has insulted its core audience, and the core audience is not too keen about it.

You can say that as many times as you want... but viewership is down across the board, and all because of online streaming. I can use my android box and watch any NFL game I want each week.

 

[boedicca]

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

No, that is not the complete story. The NFL has insulted its core audience, and the core audience is not too keen about it.

You can say that as many times as you want... but viewership is down across the board, and all because of online streaming. I can use my android box and watch any NFL game I want each week.

Millennials are the most fervent cord cutters, and they aren't fans the way older folks are/were. Just look at the drop in participation in football teams in high school and below. Kids raised by Helicopter parents and smartphones don't do physically aggressive sports. The core audience for football is men over 50.

 

[Lewdog]

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

No, that is not the complete story. The NFL has insulted its core audience, and the core audience is not too keen about it.

You can say that as many times as you want... but viewership is down across the board, and all because of online streaming. I can use my android box and watch any NFL game I want each week.

Millennials are the most fervent cord cutters, and they aren't fans the way older folks are/were. Just look at the drop in participation in football teams in high school and below. Kids raised by Helicopter parents and smartphones don't do physically aggressive sports. The core audience for football is men over 50.

You just brought up something that weakens your position that the viewership drop has to do with players kneeling. Kudos.

 

[boedicca]

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

No, that is not the complete story. The NFL has insulted its core audience, and the core audience is not too keen about it.

You can say that as many times as you want... but viewership is down across the board, and all because of online streaming. I can use my android box and watch any NFL game I want each week.

Millennials are the most fervent cord cutters, and they aren't fans the way older folks are/were. Just look at the drop in participation in football teams in high school and below. Kids raised by Helicopter parents and smartphones don't do physically aggressive sports. The core audience for football is men over 50.

You just brought up something that weakens your position that the viewership drop has to do with players kneeling. Kudos.

Hardly. Older people are more inclined to have cable or DirectTV. Millennials have skipped both and often have streaming services instead. Hence, the drop in TV viewership is skewed towards older fans, the core NFL audience.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

I don't know, lot of blacks say they are boycotting, and a lot of whites say the same thing, but for opposite reasons.
I can't see how the kneeling has helped anything, and it sure appears it's hurt.

Bottom line is, most everyone you'll talk to will claim they are disgusted with politics getting injected into what was their escape from all the division and bad news in the country. Like I say, I can't see how it's helped.

I'm not boycotting, but I sure the hell am watching a lot more college ball, and a lot less NFL.

 

[Lewdog]

Well if you watch the NFL and pay attention, you'd realize there are a lot of QBs in the NFL that aren't as good as he is. Did you see how well Kevin Hogan played for the Browns today?

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

I don't know, lot of blacks say they are boycotting, and a lot of whites say the same thing, but for opposite reasons.
I can't see how the kneeling has helped anything, and it sure appears it's hurt.

Bottom line is, most everyone you'll talk to will claim they are disgusted with politics getting injected into what was their escape from all the division and bad news in the country. Like I say, I can't see how it's helped.

I'm not boycotting, but I sure the hell am watching a lot more college ball, and a lot less NFL.

Are they boycotting the NHL and NASCAR too?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

That's a subjective judgement. Technical stats don't score the toxic impact somebody with Kaeperpimpleneck's entitlement attitude will have on a team and its fan base.

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

I don't know, lot of blacks say they are boycotting, and a lot of whites say the same thing, but for opposite reasons.
I can't see how the kneeling has helped anything, and it sure appears it's hurt.

Bottom line is, most everyone you'll talk to will claim they are disgusted with politics getting injected into what was their escape from all the division and bad news in the country. Like I say, I can't see how it's helped.

I'm not boycotting, but I sure the hell am watching a lot more college ball, and a lot less NFL.

Are they boycotting the NHL and NASCAR too?

I don't know, I don't pay attention to either of those.

 

[initforme]

Considering how abject slimy and utter scum American politics has become yes working folk, rich not included, look for an escape from it. They want their booze and some football. Not politics. Overnationalistic low IQ folk have made it bigger than it should be.

 

[Lewdog]

People are kneeling on almost every team now. Him kneeling isn't as big as an issue as it was before.

And that's not working out so well, is it?

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

• 
  
  
  • Credit Suisse cut its third-quarter EPS estimates on CBS by 5 percent, citing the company's softer Sunday NFL ratings.

CBS earnings to disappoint due to weak NFL ratings, Credit Suisse says

It's already been mentioned. Ratings are done because so many people are streaming the games online and therefore aren't showing up in the ratings despite people are still watching.

I don't know, lot of blacks say they are boycotting, and a lot of whites say the same thing, but for opposite reasons.
I can't see how the kneeling has helped anything, and it sure appears it's hurt.

Bottom line is, most everyone you'll talk to will claim they are disgusted with politics getting injected into what was their escape from all the division and bad news in the country. Like I say, I can't see how it's helped.

I'm not boycotting, but I sure the hell am watching a lot more college ball, and a lot less NFL.

Are they boycotting the NHL and NASCAR too?

I don't know, I don't pay attention to either of those.

Their ratings are down as well... and none of them are kneeling, and even one of the NASCAR owners came out and said if a person on any of his crews knelled they would be fired immediately and would have to pay for their own bus ticket home.