Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Really.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
Really.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
What's functional and practical difference between the rifle in the OP and this one:
Please be specific.
Specifically, how does that disqualify the gun in the OP?Really.The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
What's functional and practical difference between the rifle in the OP and this one:
Please be specific.
The guns that should be allowed are the guns that fire only one bullet each time the trigger is pulled. Anymore than that and there is no need for that gun - only want.
The Fifth Amendment guarantees a right to private property, like your car, for example.If you agree that government has a compelling need to know where legally obtained vehicles are, why would guns be any different, since some legal guns are used for highly illegal purposes?
There is no Constitutional right to own a car. Further the Government has no idea where your car is unless a cop is behind it on the radio or it is in an impound lot.
What part of "shall not Infringe" don't you understand councilor?
The Government has no compelling interest EXCEPT the ability to decide to confiscate the weapons, to know where legally held and purchased firearms are.
If a robber loses her legal gun during an attempted stick-up, the government has a compelling interest to find that legal gun's owner, Your Honor.
Really.The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
What's functional and practical difference between the rifle in the OP and this one:
Please be specific.
The guns that should be allowed are the guns that fire only one bullet each time the trigger is pulled. Anymore than that and there is no need for that gun - only want.
There isnt even a first step.Yet. Thus the claim of "first step".And theres the problem typical of many Second Amendment supporters.
You make these highly hyperbolic and inaccurate statements which serve to only undermine an otherwise cogent argument.
Yes, registration does manifest an undue burden to the exercising of ones Second Amendment rights, and there is indeed no evidence that registration reduces gun violence. But it has nothing at all to do with confiscation, as no lawmaker or lawmaking body is proposing any such measure.
There isnt even a path to walk, for that matter.
If you and others on the right want to have a serious debate concerning the issue, then have a serious debate.
Idiocy about gun confiscation is not a serious debate, its tinfoil hat nonsense.
Ive been an advocate of Second Amendment rights since before the 94 ban, in those 20-odd years the most significant obstacle hasnt been gun-grabbers, its been the lunatic rightwing fringe burying their guns in the backyard.
Obviously I'm not cut out for law...I was trying to create a scenario where a legal gun owner uses her legal gun to attempt a robbery. Apparently, stolen guns do not account for most criminal gun violence:The Fifth Amendment guarantees a right to private property, like your car, for example.
If a robber loses her legal gun during an attempted stick-up, the government has a compelling interest to find that legal gun's owner, Your Honor.
You sure you are a lawyer? That argument is so weak a 5 year old could destroy it. EXACTLY how does knowing she had a gun and it being registered help find it after it is stolen? You are aware when you report a weapon stolen they want the serial number in case they recover it?
"An expert on crime gun patterns, ATF agent Jay Wachtel says that most guns used in crimes are not stolen out of private gun owners' homes and cars. 'Stolen guns account for only about 10% to 15% of guns used in crimes,' Wachtel said. Because when they want guns they want them immediately the wait is usually too long for a weapon to be stolen and find its way to a criminal."
frontline: hot guns: "How Criminals Get Guns" | PBS
... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
Really.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
What's functional and practical difference between the rifle in the OP and this one:
Please be specific.
Really.The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
What's functional and practical difference between the rifle in the OP and this one:
Please be specific.
The guns that should be allowed are the guns that fire only one bullet each time the trigger is pulled. Anymore than that and there is no need for that gun - only want.
Define "assault rifle", fool.
Another superb example of mindless ignorance. Well done.1) You think it's cool.
/thread
You misunderstand.
You are an uneducated, unsophisticated, and utterly worthless fridge right gun cultist.
You live in a fantasy world of Red Dawn and Walking Dead. That rifle only serves as a very dangerous prop in your pathetic little fantasies. You're not qualified to be in the police or military and have no valid reason to own and operate a weapon like that.
Because you think it's cool, we can conclude it has no practical purpose.
Get it?
... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
The only reason someone needs a gun like that is to shoot multiple people in a short space of time.
It is not the gun needed for home defense, so ban it.
Is this what you consider a sound argument?I don't want anyone shooting me in the face with it in a movie theater.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
Expalins a lot.Yeah.Is this what you consider a sound argument?I don't want anyone shooting me in the face with it in a movie theater.
Very sound.
By your reasoning we should wait to register a vehicle until it's used in a hit-and-run?The Fifth Amendment guarantees a right to private property, like your car, for example.There is no Constitutional right to own a car. Further the Government has no idea where your car is unless a cop is behind it on the radio or it is in an impound lot.
What part of "shall not Infringe" don't you understand councilor?
The Government has no compelling interest EXCEPT the ability to decide to confiscate the weapons, to know where legally held and purchased firearms are.
If a robber loses her legal gun during an attempted stick-up, the government has a compelling interest to find that legal gun's owner, Your Honor.
If said robber uses that legal weapon during an attempted stick-up, then it is no longer private property. It is merely evidence for a criminal prosecution. The government does not have a need to know what legal weapons are with which responsible gun owners prior to a crime being committed. We live in a "innocent until proven guilty" society, not the other way around....
