Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?No takers?
None?
It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?No takers?
None?
I don't think I would support that six month gang cleanup unless it started on Wall Street.It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?No takers?
None?
Yes, registration is nothing more then the first step to confiscation. The Government has no compelling need to know where LEGALLY obtained and owned weapons are.
Would you support a 6 month period where the Government was free to ignore the Constitution to clean up gangs and their weapons?
It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?No takers?
None?
Yes, registration is nothing more then the first step to confiscation. The Government has no compelling need to know where LEGALLY obtained and owned weapons are.
Would you support a 6 month period where the Government was free to ignore the Constitution to clean up gangs and their weapons?
I don't know what it is. But whatever it is I doubt it is any more lethal at any distance than a Remington 700 in 30.06 with an ordinary, well-zeroed, 3-9x scope and a clip-on bipod. The pistol grip is redundant.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
Yet. Thus the claim of "first step".It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?
Yes, registration is nothing more then the first step to confiscation. The Government has no compelling need to know where LEGALLY obtained and owned weapons are.
Would you support a 6 month period where the Government was free to ignore the Constitution to clean up gangs and their weapons?
And theres the problem typical of many Second Amendment supporters.
You make these highly hyperbolic and inaccurate statements which serve to only undermine an otherwise cogent argument.
Yes, registration does manifest an undue burden to the exercising of ones Second Amendment rights, and there is indeed no evidence that registration reduces gun violence. But it has nothing at all to do with confiscation, as no lawmaker or lawmaking body is proposing any such measure.
... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
It is designed to shoot under a minute at 1000yds.I don't know what it is. But whatever it is I doubt it is any more lethal at any distance than a Remington 700 in 30.06 with an ordinary, well-zeroed, 3-9x scope and a clip-on bipod. The pistol grip is redundant.... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
Am I mistaken?
Why?... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
Tell me who makes it.
Why?... with a sound argument, and I will support any gun ban you care to name.
Note that a 5-rd mag is pictured; the gun can take any standard SR25 5- 10- or 20-rd mag.
Tell me who makes it.
It's too scary looking...Would you object to registering it?
Yes, registration is nothing more then the first step to confiscation. The Government has no compelling need to know where LEGALLY obtained and owned weapons are.
Would you support a 6 month period where the Government was free to ignore the Constitution to clean up gangs and their weapons?
And theres the problem typical of many Second Amendment supporters.
You make these highly hyperbolic and inaccurate statements which serve to only undermine an otherwise cogent argument.
Yes, registration does manifest an undue burden to the exercising of ones Second Amendment rights, and there is indeed no evidence that registration reduces gun violence. But it has nothing at all to do with confiscation, as no lawmaker or lawmaking body is proposing any such measure.
Registration: The Nazi Paradigm - by Stephen P. HalbrookThe Night of the Broken Glass (Kristallnacht)--the infamous Nazi rampage against Germany's Jews--took place in November 1938. It was preceded by the confiscation of firearms from the Jewish victims. On Nov. 8, the New York Times reported from Berlin, "Berlin Police Head Announces 'Disarming' of Jews," explaining:
The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been "disarmed" with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.
Registration = Confiscation |The only way we can truly be safe and prevent further gun violence is to ban civilian ownership of all guns. That means everything. No pistols, no revolvers, no semiautomatic or automatic rifles. No bolt action. No breaking actions or falling blocks. Nothing. This is the only thing that we can possibly do to keep our children safe from both mass murder and common street violence.
The very first thing we need is national registry. We need to know where the guns are, and who has them. Canada has a national firearms registry. We need to copy their model. We need a law demanding all firearms be registered to a national database. We need to know who has them and where they are.
So registration is the first step. Now that the vast majority are registered, we can do what we will. "Registration = Confiscation"
Posted on December 31, 2012 by R.D. Walker
TubbWhy?Tell me who makes it.
Just curious, I want to look up the specs. I cant Identify it from that photo. looks to me to be .223 or .308, BTW I dont believe in banning any guns.
TubbWhy?
Just curious, I want to look up the specs. I cant Identify it from that photo. looks to me to be .223 or .308, BTW I dont believe in banning any guns.
