Jussie Smollet Indicted on 6 counts of disorderly conduct

[OKTexas]

Yup, they want their pound of flesh.

Jussie Smollett accused of lying to CPD, indicted on 6 counts of disorderly conduct

CHICAGO - In a story FOX 32 News broke first, former “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett was indicted Tuesday in Chicago by special prosecutor Dan Webb, stemming from the alleged racist and anti-gay attack on him that occurred in January of 2019.

Smollett is due in court February 24 at the Criminal Court Building at 26th and California. Webb said in a statement that Smollett faces six felony counts of disorderly conduct, charges that stem from four separate false reports that he gave to police in which he contended he was a victim of a hate crime “knowing that he was not the victim of a crime.”

This strikes me as Dan Webb (a Republican) trying to sandbag Kim Fox, who is up for re-election next month.

So you are going to charge someone with something that almost always brings no jail time, especially for a first time offender, who has deep pockets to drag out a court case?

"But, but, but he said bad things about Trump Supporters!!!"

And now that he's been convicted of 5 of those FELONY counts, he'll likely be facing another, can you say PERJURY? He should have never taken the stand and lied his ass off under oath. He deserves everything that's coming his way.

.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Yup, they want their pound of flesh.

Jussie Smollett accused of lying to CPD, indicted on 6 counts of disorderly conduct

CHICAGO - In a story FOX 32 News broke first, former “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett was indicted Tuesday in Chicago by special prosecutor Dan Webb, stemming from the alleged racist and anti-gay attack on him that occurred in January of 2019.

Smollett is due in court February 24 at the Criminal Court Building at 26th and California. Webb said in a statement that Smollett faces six felony counts of disorderly conduct, charges that stem from four separate false reports that he gave to police in which he contended he was a victim of a hate crime “knowing that he was not the victim of a crime.”

This strikes me as Dan Webb (a Republican) trying to sandbag Kim Fox, who is up for re-election next month.

So you are going to charge someone with something that almost always brings no jail time, especially for a first time offender, who has deep pockets to drag out a court case?

"But, but, but he said bad things about Trump Supporters!!!"

Sambo needs some jail time.

 

[JoeB131]

So Trump created Smellit?
We got it

Has your reading comprehension been this poor. Go back. Read what I wrote.. then have a grown up explain the big words to you.

Don't quit yer day job, Matlock.

My point still stands... this verdict will probably not hold up on appeal because of double jeopardy grounds.

Those are felony charges. He's a convicted felon now. That moves him up like three notches in the DemoKKKrat hierarchy, right?

Again, probably won't hold up on appeal. He already had an agreement with Cook County, which the State of Illinois violated by appointing a special prosecutor.

I don't understand all of this uproar over ONE passive-aggressive black fag attempting to further racial division in the country.
See it for what it is, and move on.

Because one fake hate crime allows the right wing to ignore all the real hate crimes that happen in this country.

 

[JoeB131]

And now that he's been convicted of 5 of those FELONY counts, he'll likely be facing another, can you say PERJURY? He should have never taken the stand and lied his ass off under oath. He deserves everything that's coming his way.

Unlikely.

Here's what's more likely to happen. Webb's lawyers and his lawyers will sit down and work out a sentencing agreement with no jail time, if Smollett promises not to appeal the double jeopardy aspects of this case.

 

[DudleySmith]

Deport Smollet. Send Kim Fox with him.

 

[Meathead]

Yup, they want their pound of flesh.

Jussie Smollett accused of lying to CPD, indicted on 6 counts of disorderly conduct

CHICAGO - In a story FOX 32 News broke first, former “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett was indicted Tuesday in Chicago by special prosecutor Dan Webb, stemming from the alleged racist and anti-gay attack on him that occurred in January of 2019.

Smollett is due in court February 24 at the Criminal Court Building at 26th and California. Webb said in a statement that Smollett faces six felony counts of disorderly conduct, charges that stem from four separate false reports that he gave to police in which he contended he was a victim of a hate crime “knowing that he was not the victim of a crime.”

This strikes me as Dan Webb (a Republican) trying to sandbag Kim Fox, who is up for re-election next month.

So you are going to charge someone with something that almost always brings no jail time, especially for a first time offender, who has deep pockets to drag out a court case?

"But, but, but he said bad things about Trump Supporters!!!"

Maybe faking a hate crime should be a hate crime.

 

[Meathead]

Unlikely.

Here's what's more likely to happen. Webb's lawyers and his lawyers will sit down and work out a sentencing agreement with no jail time, if Smollett promises not to appeal the double jeopardy aspects of this case.

One year out in 6 months because he took the stand and insulted the jury's intelligence, even if they are Chicagoans.

 

[DBA]

Because one fake hate crime allows the right wing to ignore all the real hate crimes that happen in this country.

Should they have just harshly told him that what he did was wrong and let him go on his merry way to protect any future hate crimes that may occur? A person’s guilt or innonence should not be based on the public reaction.

BTW, the two paid “assailants“ were asked on the stand who their target audience was and they said the media. Heck, even Smollett knew the fake news media would buy it and run with it without question. If the roles were reversed we ALL know that the story would have been heavily scrutinized.

 

[JoeB131]

Should they have just harshly told him that what he did was wrong and let him go on his merry way to protect any future hate crimes that may occur? A person’s guilt or innonence should not be based on the public reaction.

Actually, he lost his job, he became the butt of thousands of jokes and his career as an actor is pretty much over. He can't get hired to do dinner theater at this point. Exposing his hoax was punishment enough. Turning the whole legal system on its head to go after one guy for a prank was kind of stupid.

We didn't turn the whole legal system on it's head in 1989 when Morton Downey, Jr. made a desperate plea for attention by drawing a swastika on his forehead and claimed some skinheads beat him up. No reason to do that here, either.

BTW, the two paid “assailants“ were asked on the stand who their target audience was and they said the media. Heck, even Smollett knew the fake news media would buy it and run with it without question. If the roles were reversed we ALL know that the story would have been heavily scrutinized.

Would it have been?

Frankly, we have news stories every day of white women who call the cops on black people for just being there. It's become so common we've even developed a name for them, "Karen" (which kind of sucks if your parents named you Karen 40 years ago.) Yet very few Karens are charged with crimes for making false police reports.

 

[j-mac]

Actually, he lost his job, he became the butt of thousands of jokes and his career as an actor is pretty much over. He can't get hired to do dinner theater at this point. Exposing his hoax was punishment enough. Turning the whole legal system on its head to go after one guy for a prank was kind of stupid.

What you are leaving out of the equation is that during that time the country was flairing into pure chaos over claims like this...Businesses were ruined, people were killed, and these areas suffered damage that to this day hasn't fully recovered...What Smollet did was try to trigger that to happen in Chicago, for which he should face punishment...

We didn't turn the whole legal system on it's head in 1989 when Morton Downey, Jr. made a desperate plea for attention by drawing a swastika on his forehead and claimed some skinheads beat him up. No reason to do that here, either.

"Because the police could find no corroborating evidence, and because there was a young teenager present who saw nothing resembling a gang of head-shaving Nazis, and, most importantly, because the swastika was painted on his face backward as though he did it to himself in a mirror, well, world opinion was pretty much unanimous that he faked the incident to derive sympathetic publicity in the hope that said publicity would save his television show.

It didn't. The show was cancelled a couple months later."

Morton Downey's swastika - 1989

Maybe it's unfair to include Morton Downey, Jr., on a website about bogus hate crimes since the man never admitted that he faked this incident, but nobody anywhere on Planet Earth thinks that he didn't fake it...

www.bogushatecrimes.com

2001 were different times...The police pretty much dismissed Downey's claims the very same day...If I recall you didn't have politicians, activist groups, and cable news carrying Downey Jr's water either...He lost his show in disgrace, and is a laughing stock...

Smollet carried this too far, and should pay for that...

Frankly, we have news stories every day of white women who call the cops on black people for just being there. It's become so common we've even developed a name for them, "Karen" (which kind of sucks if your parents named you Karen 40 years ago.) Yet very few Karens are charged with crimes for making false police reports.

Do these "Karen's" have the media platform that Smollet does? No...Bad analogy.

 

[Nostra]

Has your reading comprehension been this poor. Go back. Read what I wrote.. then have a grown up explain the big words to you.



My point still stands... this verdict will probably not hold up on appeal because of double jeopardy grounds.


Again, probably won't hold up on appeal. He already had an agreement with Cook County, which the State of Illinois violated by appointing a special prosecutor.



Because one fake hate crime allows the right wing to ignore all the real hate crimes that happen in this country.

My point still stands... this verdict will probably not hold up on appeal because of double jeopardy grounds.

There is no double jeopardy. Apparently you have no clue WTF that is.

 

[Nostra]

Unlikely.

Here's what's more likely to happen. Webb's lawyers and his lawyers will sit down and work out a sentencing agreement with no jail time, if Smollett promises not to appeal the double jeopardy aspects of this case.

It's fucking hilarious you think Smollett is in a position of power. He got trounced in court on the facts, lied his ass off under oath, and is facing a stiff prison sentence.

 

[Roudy]

View attachment 306195

 

[Ame®icano]

Did it to himself.

At least, in jail he'll be safe from his attackers.

 

[OKTexas]

Unlikely.

Here's what's more likely to happen. Webb's lawyers and his lawyers will sit down and work out a sentencing agreement with no jail time, if Smollett promises not to appeal the double jeopardy aspects of this case.

There was nothing about the case where he could claim double jeopardy. And after he lied on the stand I don't think the prosecutor will allow him to skate with no jail time, he could be facing 3 years per guilty count.

.

 

[DudleySmith]

Should they have just harshly told him that what he did was wrong and let him go on his merry way to protect any future hate crimes that may occur? A person’s guilt or innonence should not be based on the public reaction.

BTW, the two paid “assailants“ were asked on the stand who their target audience was and they said the media. Heck, even Smollett knew the fake news media would buy it and run with it without question. If the roles were reversed we ALL know that the story would have been heavily scrutinized.

He should do time; this sort of garbage also promotes committing hate crimes among the stupid, of which back people have far more than their share of violence prone racists already.

 

[DudleySmith]

What you are leaving out of the equation is that during that time the country was flairing into pure chaos over claims like this...Businesses were ruined, people were killed, and these areas suffered damage that to this day hasn't fully recovered...What Smollet did was try to trigger that to happen in Chicago, for which he should face punishment...

Yep. It was no 'victimless crime', for sure. He wanted to promote violence and death and hate crimes.

 

[JoeB131]

What you are leaving out of the equation is that during that time the country was flairing into pure chaos over claims like this...Businesses were ruined, people were killed, and these areas suffered damage that to this day hasn't fully recovered...What Smollet did was try to trigger that to happen in Chicago, for which he should face punishment...

None of that had anything to do with Smollet. Nobody was going to riot over Smollet.

The reason why we had riots last year is because we had dozens of REAL incidents, often perpetrated by COPS, that no one was held accountable for.

Smollet was trying to get a bigger role on his TV show... which was dumb.

It didn't. The show (Morton Downey) was cancelled a couple months later."

As it should have been. I was also perfectly fine with Empire writing Smollet's character out of the show and his never getting another acting gig again... Appointing a "Special Prosecutor" to investigate a class IV felony where no one died, is just silly. It's going after a mosquito with a sledgehammer.

2001 were different times...The police pretty much dismissed Downey's claims the very same day...If I recall you didn't have politicians, activist groups, and cable news carrying Downey Jr's water either...He lost his show in disgrace, and is a laughing stock...

Smollet carried this too far, and should pay for that...

Gee, let's look at that. The politicians found his story credible because you have a president who spent the last four years spreading racist hate. They called for a robust investigation instead of the CPD doing what it often does with cases, sweep them under the rug. (Once again, in 2018, only 17% of HOMICIDES were solved in Chicago.) So given the CPD's kind of awful track record of investigating the deaths of black people they didn't kill themselves, you can kind of see why the politicians said, "Hey, take this one seriously, the rest of the country is watching."

Do these "Karen's" have the media platform that Smollet does? No...Bad analogy.

NO, but remember, your argument is that we should punish Smollett over what MIGHT have happened. Well, some trigger happy cop MIGHT have shot some poor black birdwatcher because a Karen reported him. therefore, we need to go after Karen's making false police reports with the fullest extent of the law.

 

[JoeB131]

There was nothing about the case where he could claim double jeopardy. And after he lied on the stand I don't think the prosecutor will allow him to skate with no jail time, he could be facing 3 years per guilty count.

Except perjury is never prosecuted in trials...

Again, this case comes down to do you beleive the Nigerian Brothers, or Smollet. Kind of hard to claim "perjury" when your star witnesses only gave the story they gave to avoid jail time themselves.

Again, they'll cut a sentencing deal as soon as they've realized no one is looking to avoid appeals.

 

[j-mac]

None of that had anything to do with Smollet. Nobody was going to riot over Smollet.

You have no idea if they would have, or not...That is just you filling in the blanks to fit your narrative...

The reason why we had riots last year is because we had dozens of REAL incidents, often perpetrated by COPS, that no one was held accountable for.

That is simply untrue...These riots, and such happened before the system could even address the situation in many cases...

These were, and remain lynch mobs constructed by BLM, and AntiFa...

Smollet was trying to get a bigger role on his TV show... which was dumb.

At least you and I agree that Smollett was, and remains a dumbass.

As it should have been. I was also perfectly fine with Empire writing Smollet's character out of the show and his never getting another acting gig again... Appointing a "Special Prosecutor" to investigate a class IV felony where no one died, is just silly. It's going after a mosquito with a sledgehammer.

Well, I would think that sometimes in the halls of our prosecutorial system, discussions are that situations arise (American's believing there are two standards of justice) where an example needs to happen...Jussie drew his nomination for the Darwin award when he decided to enlist the Nigerian bros. to beat him up to form a false narrative in the country....And without an ounce of skepticism at all, outlets like MSNBC, CNN, and GMA all just ran unquestioningly with Somollett's narrative because it made their tripe of America being a racist shithole sync up....Well, I support throwing the book at him, and I also support going after Kim Fox as well..

Gee, let's look at that. The politicians found his story credible because you have a president who spent the last four years spreading racist hate.

Well, ain't that boilerplate bullshit right there.....Trump wasn't the one spreading anything, it was you liars on the left that were parsing every comma, every semi colon, every word, trying to cherry pick, take out of context, or simply make up what Trump said at any given moment...Now, don't get me wrong, there were plenty of times where Trump stuck his foot firmly in his mouth, but for the most part it was a completely unhinged left spreading fertilizer....

They called for a robust investigation instead of the CPD doing what it often does with cases, sweep them under the rug. (Once again, in 2018, only 17% of HOMICIDES were solved in Chicago.) So given the CPD's kind of awful track record of investigating the deaths of black people they didn't kill themselves, you can kind of see why the politicians said, "Hey, take this one seriously, the rest of the country is watching."

You have got to be kidding me here....Chicago is a cesspool of black on black crime and shootings....Rivaling the likes of Iraq, or Afghanistan in terms of danger, and you pukes ignored, or outright dismissed the disgusting numbers coming out of Chicago for years...You think CPD is sweeping these under the rug? Hell man, they are out gunned....And in the wake of all of that you people come up with the absolute dumbest plan in the history of the world, which is to defund them and cut their legs out even more. Then you want to blame the crime on them? That's just dumber than dumb...

NO, but remember, your argument is that we should punish Smollett over what MIGHT have happened. Well, some trigger happy cop MIGHT have shot some poor black birdwatcher because a Karen reported him. therefore, we need to go after Karen's making false police reports with the fullest extent of the law.

Wow...ok, you have this narrative in your head, so let's examine what makes you think that is even a possibility in Chicago...Show me stats where in Chicago where blacks were shot by police in responding to a false report by some "Karen" as you call them....This is where you never provide what is asked for....