Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The answer: Yes.Here's the concern I have.
He insists on a Chicago Jury.
Then his lawyer gets up there and reminds EVERYONE that Jason van Dyke shot LaQuan McDonald 16 times and only got three years. They'll remind the jury of every bit of misconduct by the Chicago Police Department.
then they'll say, "Do you really believe anything these guys say, my brothers?"
Hey, hold there for a second, I want to use you as an example of something....and the filthy ass Negro kid that shot up a school is at home playing video games.
I don't believe one damn word you say. Then in classic leftist fashion you omit the fact that your President and VP whore used the hoax to attack Trump and set your queer pawn up as a martyr. Everything you maggots touch turns political and is a lie.
So Trump created Smellit?Hey, hold there for a second, I want to use you as an example of something.
The problem is that after three years of Trump's ugly racial rhetoric, an attack like the one that happened to Smollett was plausible. You know, like the post above, where that kind of rhetoric someone thinks is okay.
Did it to himself.Just like Obama, now Smollett is tarred and feathered.
What about the other 2 men, the brothers?
Don't quit yer day job, Matlock.Webb didn't find any wrongdoing on Fox's part.
The problem with charging Smollet for what is essentially a misdemeanor is that he can argue that double jeopardy is attached, since he already plead out on these charges.
If that prosecutor couldn't make this case she is an idiot.Point of note: it wasn't mysterious.
Jussie Smollett Charges Were Dropped Because Conviction Was Uncertain, Prosecutor Says
Yup, they want their pound of flesh.
Jussie Smollett accused of lying to CPD, indicted on 6 counts of disorderly conduct
CHICAGO - In a story FOX 32 News broke first, former “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett was indicted Tuesday in Chicago by special prosecutor Dan Webb, stemming from the alleged racist and anti-gay attack on him that occurred in January of 2019.
Smollett is due in court February 24 at the Criminal Court Building at 26th and California. Webb said in a statement that Smollett faces six felony counts of disorderly conduct, charges that stem from four separate false reports that he gave to police in which he contended he was a victim of a hate crime “knowing that he was not the victim of a crime.”
This strikes me as Dan Webb (a Republican) trying to sandbag Kim Fox, who is up for re-election next month.
So you are going to charge someone with something that almost always brings no jail time, especially for a first time offender, who has deep pockets to drag out a court case?
"But, but, but he said bad things about Trump Supporters!!!"
Liar. Give us an example of "Trump's ugly racial rhetoric".Hey, hold there for a second, I want to use you as an example of something.
The problem is that after three years of Trump's ugly racial rhetoric, an attack like the one that happened to Smollett was plausible. You know, like the post above, where that kind of rhetoric someone thinks is okay.
Hey, hold there for a second, I want to use you as an example of something.
The problem is that after three years of Trump's ugly racial rhetoric, an attack like the one that happened to Smollett was plausible. You know, like the post above, where that kind of rhetoric someone thinks is okay.
They have no clue why they are in a perpetual state of offended so it must be the default of racismEverything is racist to you stupid Moon Bats.
Liberals created it.Liar. Give us an example of "Trump's ugly racial rhetoric".
Yep. The left believes their own propaganda.Liberals created it.
hahahhah what ugly racial rhetoric? Did he call an African- American a negro?Hey, hold there for a second, I want to use you as an example of something.
The problem is that after three years of Trump's ugly racial rhetoric, an attack like the one that happened to Smollett was plausible. You know, like the post above, where that kind of rhetoric someone thinks is okay.