PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
Your input is not required. TY...So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your input is not required. TY...So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
State number 8 on the list of appeal court decisions in favor of gay marriage. That's pretty heavy momentum for gay marriage. I don't see how it's remotely possibly for the SCOTUS to turn down national gay marriage at this point.
Utah
Oklahoma
Texas
Kentucky
Virginia
Ohio
Michigan
and now Arkansas
So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
Your input is not required. TY...So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
Who needs a government for the people and by the people when we have Obama, Holder, and a handful of activist, gay judges in absolute control? Screw the people!
Your input is not required. TY...So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
And yours is? NTY
Cookin' with gas now. The US becomes somewhat like it should be, eventually.
State number 8 on the list of appeal court decisions in favor of gay marriage. That's pretty heavy momentum for gay marriage. I don't see how it's remotely possibly for the SCOTUS to turn down national gay marriage at this point.
Utah
Oklahoma
Texas
Kentucky
Virginia
Ohio
Michigan
and now Arkansas
Excellent.
So much for that old "will of the people" deal.
Who needs a government for the people and by the people when we have Obama, Holder, and a handful of activist, gay judges in absolute control? Screw the people!
It wouldn't matter if Hitler, Stalin, and Satan were in charge, the equal rights of others don't require your approval before they become law.
Equality before the law is not special.Who needs a government for the people and by the people when we have Obama, Holder, and a handful of activist, gay judges in absolute control? Screw the people!
It wouldn't matter if Hitler, Stalin, and Satan were in charge, the equal rights of others don't require your approval before they become law.
So you would be first in line to give special rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his consenting daughter? C'mon ... no moral standards allowed. Just rights.
Who needs a government for the people and by the people when we have Obama, Holder, and a handful of activist, gay judges in absolute control? Screw the people!
It wouldn't matter if Hitler, Stalin, and Satan were in charge, the equal rights of others don't require your approval before they become law.
So you would be first in line to give special rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his consenting daughter? C'mon ... no moral standards allowed. Just rights.
State number 8 on the list of appeal court decisions in favor of gay marriage. That's pretty heavy momentum for gay marriage. I don't see how it's remotely possibly for the SCOTUS to turn down national gay marriage at this point.
Utah
Oklahoma
Texas
Kentucky
Virginia
Ohio
Michigan
and now Arkansas
What the SCOTUS needs to do is recognize States's Rights concerning this issue and overturn the decisions of the gay, Federal activists that disregarded the will and vote of the People. The People, that is, who literally voted in a Democratic manner. The will of the one should not overrule the will of the many where the results of an honest and legal vote expressed the will of the people of those States.
Equality before the law is not special.It wouldn't matter if Hitler, Stalin, and Satan were in charge, the equal rights of others don't require your approval before they become law.
So you would be first in line to give special rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his consenting daughter? C'mon ... no moral standards allowed. Just rights.
And the choices of others doesn't require your moral stamp of approval.
I cannot lay my finger on the provision in the BoR which protects the supposed right to a state issued marriage license.State number 8 on the list of appeal court decisions in favor of gay marriage. That's pretty heavy momentum for gay marriage. I don't see how it's remotely possibly for the SCOTUS to turn down national gay marriage at this point.
Utah
Oklahoma
Texas
Kentucky
Virginia
Ohio
Michigan
and now Arkansas
What the SCOTUS needs to do is recognize States's Rights concerning this issue and overturn the decisions of the gay, Federal activists that disregarded the will and vote of the People. The People, that is, who literally voted in a Democratic manner. The will of the one should not overrule the will of the many where the results of an honest and legal vote expressed the will of the people of those States.
Interesting the hypocrisy of conservatives when you and others on the right abandon the ‘will of the people’ rhetoric after a state bans ‘assault weapons.’
Because it is not a right and it is not about love.Nobody is oppressing anyone. Nobody is hating.
Quit yer whining.
Then why deny them the right to marry who they love?
Why are you progressives such suckers for disingenuous sob stories?
The faggots around here know how to keep their cock sucking mouths shut. I'd really hate to be a fag in this state when the sun goes down. The courts ruling is inconsequential to the throw down that is eventually coming.
That's a seriously disgusting statement
Homosexuality is a seriously disgusting act.
It wouldn't matter if Hitler, Stalin, and Satan were in charge, the equal rights of others don't require your approval before they become law.
So you would be first in line to give special rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his consenting daughter? C'mon ... no moral standards allowed. Just rights.
Same-sex couples arent seeking special rights, only the acknowledgement by the state of the rights theyve always possessed, as is the case with every American.
And the issue has nothing to do with giving rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his daughter, the notion is ignorant demagoguery.
So you would be first in line to give special rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his consenting daughter? C'mon ... no moral standards allowed. Just rights.
Same-sex couples arent seeking special rights, only the acknowledgement by the state of the rights theyve always possessed, as is the case with every American.
And the issue has nothing to do with giving rights to NAMBLA or to a father who wants to marry his daughter, the notion is ignorant demagoguery.
And yet you, too, fail to answer the question. Does a father have a right to marry his consenting daughter? Does a 60 year old man have the right to marry a consenting 16 year old boy (with his parents' approval)? Does an adult man have the right to marry 5 other consenting, adult men and 2 consenting adult women? It's a simple question (group of questions). Do they have the "right" to marry who they want or not? If your answer is NO to any of the above questions then from whence do you draw your moral basis?
Then you never again have the right to consider America a "democracy." Why vote at all?
En you have to admit you dont understand our laws
See post above. Then admit that YOU don't understand our laws. Where in the Constitution is there a special provision for mentally (spiritually) ill, homosexuals?
Then you never again have the right to consider America a "democracy." Why vote at all?
En you have to admit you dont understand our laws
See post above. Then admit that YOU don't understand our laws. Where in the Constitution is there a special provision for mentally (spiritually) ill, homosexuals?
well captain in america you cant vote to strip people of rights. Since you and others seem to have an issue with this fact, you think the judges are being activist. Scotus's recent ruling already paved the way for gay marriage rights. These judges are just following the law set.