Judge Ken Starr just sank Nancy's "Impeachment of Trump"

[kyzr]

Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.

Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.

The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.

Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.

 

[Dick Foster]

Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.

Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.

The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.

It was a most excellent talk and a pretty good history lesson too.
It brought the notion to my mind that those responsible for this farce should be punished so this kind of silly shit isn't repeated in the future.

 

[22lcidw]

Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.

 

[rightwinger]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

 

[rightwinger]

Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.

They already impeached Clinton

Their claims of outrage ring shallow

 

[LoneLaugher]

Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.

Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.

The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.

Morons eat that shit up.

 

[Meathead]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

He prosecuted, not persecuted idiot.

 

[Dick Foster]

Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.

I think it would be better if we just jailed the silly shits responsible for the silly shit. The list begins with Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler in the least. Or maybe Pelosi and all of dumbass impeachment managers.

 

[ph3iron]

Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.

Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.

The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.

Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.

Ah the Iran contra/ bjs king.
Current supreme sitting right behind him. The guy who got illegal Linda trip recordings for the bjs.
Terrific guys
Know why he was fired from his university job?
And omg it doesn't have to be a crime Derz and 1000 legals said it himself in the 90s

 

[ph3iron]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

Amen! It's hilarious how NaziCons keep ignoring that little fact.

AND WHY HE GOT FIRED FROM HIS u job??
WWII Nazi group name.
I think all the MAGA. RUBES ARE PROUD

 

[BlindBoo]

As was explained during the opening statements, by the very rules of the House voted on by the full House at the beginning of the term, rules passed and used by Republicans to investigate Obama, the Chairs of most of the committees have standing subpoena power. So there was never a need for a special vote to make the House's subpoena power legal before the Impeachment vote.

The Porn Publisher Kenny Star is incorrect. The committees already had subpoena power. Republicans just don't want to honor their own rules. But what do you expect from that corrupt bunch of turds.

 

[ph3iron]

Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.

I think it would be better if we just jailed the silly shits responsible for the silly shit. The list begins with Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler in the least. Or maybe Pelosi and all of dumbass impeachment managers.

Not the con??
Ps we have a banana republic

 

[kyzr]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

It wasn't the blowjob, it was the cigar up the young intern's ass.

 

[kyzr]

As was explained during the opening statements, by the very rules of the House voted on by the full House at the beginning of the term, rules passed and used by Republicans to investigate Obama, the Chairs of most of the committees have standing subpoena power. So there was never a need for a special vote to make the House's subpoena power legal before the Impeachment vote.

The Porn Publisher Kenny Star is incorrect. The committees already had subpoena power. Republicans just don't want to honor their own rules. But what do you expect from that corrupt bunch of turds.

Starr's point was that in order to obtain the Constitution's "sole power of impeachment" it took passage of resolution 660 by the whole House first. Duh.

 

[mudwhistle]

Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.

They already impeached Clinton

Their claims of outrage ring shallow

Well why don't you cry about it!!!!

 

[martybegan]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

He prosecuted perjury.

 

[okfine]

Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.

Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.

The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.

Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.

Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.

 

[kyzr]

Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.

Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.

The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.

Morons eat that shit up.

What part of both fucking Articles are bullshit, constitutionally and legally don't you comprehend?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The man persecuted a blowjob

Shows his credibility

I was only 18 at the time but was it not lying about it and coercing others to lie? No?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.

Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.

The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.

Morons eat that shit up.

What part of both fucking Articles are bullshit, constitutionally and legally don't you comprehend?

No. They aren't. The evidence is clear. he abused his power for personal gain and then obstructed justice.

Impeachment is the remedy.

Idiot.