Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
I was only 18 at the time but was it not lying about it and coercing others to lie? No?
Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.
Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.
The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.
Morons eat that shit up.
What part of both fucking Articles are bullshit, constitutionally and legally don't you comprehend?
No. They aren't. The evidence is clear. he abused his power for personal gain and then obstructed justice.
Impeachment is the remedy.
Idiot.
I think it would be better if we just jailed the silly shits responsible for the silly shit. The list begins with Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler in the least. Or maybe Pelosi and all of dumbass impeachment managers.Repubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.
I believe Clinton was impeached because Nixon was impeached. Repubs may have felt bamboozled as Progs will clearly never impeach one of their own as it is known now. Repubs are followers. Or have been for decades. They learn from the other side. In fact if they took full advantage of the situation it would be a war zone in D.C. The judges issue is a thorn in Progs sides. But to soothe you, they still have many extremists who can declare voters decisions null and void and remove executive orders at willThey already impeached ClintonRepubs must impeach the next Prog president as soon as they can. All of this because Progs are pizzed off about the 2016 election. If Repubs do not give them push back, we will end up a banana republic.
Their claims of outrage ring shallow
Abuse of power.Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
Starr believes that for removal of a president by the senate a serious "high" crime must have been committed by the president.
The House can impeach for non-crimes, as an abuse of their power, but for removal by the senate it needs to be both bi-partisan and a serious crime.
If the House impeachment process isn't bi-partisan and fair, the impeachment should fail.
I love it when a message hits home.Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.
Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.
The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.
Morons eat that shit up.
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
I was only 18 at the time but was it not lying about it and coercing others to lie? No?
Yes. Exactly.
He lied under oath. He asked others to do so as well.
Trump has refused to even answer questions under oath. That is the
only reason that he has not lied under oath.
None of it matters with the constant fake news yammering and the dumbfickistan losers crying in ignorant agreement that Trump is a criminal regardless of any facts.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
He prosecuted perjury.
As was explained during the opening statements, by the very rules of the House voted on by the full House at the beginning of the term, rules passed and used by Republicans to investigate Obama, the Chairs of most of the committees have standing subpoena power. So there was never a need for a special vote to make the House's subpoena power legal before the Impeachment vote.
The Porn Publisher Kenny Star is incorrect. The committees already had subpoena power. Republicans just don't want to honor their own rules. But what do you expect from that corrupt bunch of turds.
Starr's point was that in order to obtain the Constitution's "sole power of impeachment" it took passage of resolution 660 by the whole House first. Duh.
Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
It was a most excellent talk and a pretty good history lesson too.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
It brought the notion to my mind that those responsible for this farce should be punished so this kind of silly shit isn't repeated in the future.
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
He prosecuted perjury.
For sake of completeness, Clinton was prosecuted for perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1621), suborning perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1622) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S. Code § 1503)
It was a most excellent talk and a pretty good history lesson too.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
It brought the notion to my mind that those responsible for this farce should be punished so this kind of silly shit isn't repeated in the future.
I couldn’t agree more. The problem is that Republicans refuse to punish this President for any of these illegal actions meaning that Trump will be further emboldened.
Trump needs to be taken out now so that further assholishness is completely discouraged.
No he persecuted a lying perverted asshole for lying to Congress. Plus the very same dispicable asshole looked straight into the camera and lied to the entire nation en mass. Other than being a lying, cowardly, gutless and spineless dispicably crooked piece of shit, he was a hell of a guy.The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
You're the idiot. There was and is no personal gain and there was no crime of any kind.Trombies see and hear what they wish to see and hear.
Starr was boring and professorial as he laid out no defense of Trump whatsoever.
The idea that we should not have impeachment as a check on a corrupt president
is grade A level stupid. And that is what he just claimed.
Morons eat that shit up.
What part of both fucking Articles are bullshit, constitutionally and legally don't you comprehend?
No. They aren't. The evidence is clear. he abused his power for personal gain and then obstructed justice.
Impeachment is the remedy.
Idiot.
