Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

Yeah you don't have an answer. If the Arab states seek protection from Iran and Israel does as well, where is the conflict of interest?

Answer: There is no conflict of interest. Not between Israel and America, or between the Arab states and America or Israel. Everyone wants to stop Iran from getting the bomb. You're pretending there is a conflict of interest because you want to blame the evil Jews, and you know it.

Except six countries have signed a treaty that keeps IRan from getting the bomb and most of the world is going along with it...

Except the Zionists.

Here's the thing. Bibi Whatayahoo has been screaming about how IRan was "About to get the bomb since 1992.

Netanyahu 1992 Iran will Have the Bomb by 1997 Informed Comment

1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon.

1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV.

1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000.

1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.


Except that it's 2015 now. Iran has neither an ICBM nor a Bomb, and they've just signed an agreement that allows widespread inspections and requires them to close down most of their facilities and give up a lot of the processed uranium they already have for conversion to peaceful purposes.

"But, but, but.... you just hate the Joooooooooooooos" will be the tire response.

The agreement doesn't require them to dismantle anything, and the so-called inspections are a farce.Why is it you leftist want to strengthen our enemies and weaken our allies. Clinton gave the Chinese missile technology and Obama gives Iran 100s of billions and eventually nuclear weapons. you people are really nutjobs.:cuckoo:



WHY IS IT THAT YOU ZIONUTS WANT IRANIANS TO BE OUR ENEMIES?

IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE IRANIANS THEN MOVE AND DISMANTLE THE JEWISH STATE.



.

Actually most normal people ,including most of the Iranian people want the mullahs out of power and Iran to be free of the islamonazis. Why do you like dead Jews?:cuckoo:
 
if you weren't just an idiot you'd know that Israel and the U.S. slowed Iran's progress towards their goal of nuclear weapons by sabotaging their computer systems and killing their scientist. Without that they'd have the bomb already.

Guy, besides the immorality of murdering a scientist, the fact is computers can be fixed and its not like they are inventing a new technology. This technology is already 70 years old.

The reason why Iran didn't get a bomb 20 years ago like Bibi said is that they probably weren't all that keen on getting one.

The Zionists and Neo-Cons are lying about Iran just like they lied about Saddam.
 
if you weren't just an idiot you'd know that Israel and the U.S. slowed Iran's progress towards their goal of nuclear weapons by sabotaging their computer systems and killing their scientist. Without that they'd have the bomb already.

Guy, besides the immorality of murdering a scientist, the fact is computers can be fixed and its not like they are inventing a new technology. This technology is already 70 years old.

The reason why Iran didn't get a bomb 20 years ago like Bibi said is that they probably weren't all that keen on getting one.

The Zionists and Neo-Cons are lying about Iran just like they lied about Saddam.


apos Stuxnet virus set back Iran s nuclear program by 2 years apos - Iranian Threat - Jerusalem Post

U.S. Israel developed Flame computer virus to slow Iranian nuclear efforts officials say - The Washington Post
 
The agreement doesn't require them to dismantle anything,

Actually it does...

Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Under the agreement, Iran agreed to eliminate its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium, cut its stockpile of low-enriched uranium by 98%, and reduce by about two-thirds the number of its centrifuges for at least fifteen years. For the next fifteen years, Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67%. Iran also agreed not to build any new uranium-enriching or heavy-water facilities over the same period. Uranium-enrichment activities will be limited to a single facility using first-generation centrifuges for ten years. Other facilities will be converted to avoid proliferation risks. To monitor and verify Iran's compliance with the agreement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will have regular access to all Iranian nuclear facilities. The agreement provides that in return for verifiably abiding by its commitments, Iran will receive relief from U.S., European Union, and United Nations Security Council nuclear-related sanctions.

and the so-called inspections are a farce.

  • The IAEA will have multilayered[44] oversight "over Iran's entire nuclear supply chain, from uranium mills to its procurement of nuclear-related technologies."[45] For declared nuclear sites such as Fordow and Natanz, the IAEA will have "round-the-clock access" to nuclear facilities and will be entitled to maintain continuous monitoring (including via surveillance equipment) at such sites.[45][46] The agreement authorizes the IAEA to make use of sophisticated monitoring technology, such as fiber-optic seals on equipment that can electronically send information to the IAEA; infrared satellite imagery to detect covert sites, "environmental sensors that can detect minute signs of nuclear particles"; tamper-resistant, radiation-resistant cameras.[30][47] Other tools include computerized accounting programs to gather information and detect anomalies, and big data sets on Iranian imports, to monitor dual-use items.[44]
  • The number of IAEA inspectors assigned to Iran will triple, from 50 to 150 inspectors.

Why is it you leftist want to strengthen our enemies and weaken our allies.

Why do you keep insisting the Zionists are our friends or the Iranians are our enemies? We don't have a dog or a God in this fight over who an Imaginary Sky Pixie promised a strip of desert to? Frankly,I think it's kind of silly to tell the Iranians they can't have Nukes when the Zionists haven't signed the NPT and have been lying bout their nuclear program for decades.

Clinton gave the Chinese missile technology

No, big corporations gave them that because they needed to put satellites in the sky cheaply. I'm more worried about the jobs that Bush sent over to China than some missile technology. It's not like the Chinese are going to nuke their best customers.


you people are really nutjobs

No, guy, a nutjob is someone who steals someone else's land because an imaginary Pixie in the sky told him to, andthen insists the REST OF THE WORLD put up with the wars and economic disruptions they instigate.

The rest of the world isn't playing along, which is why we have a sensible agreement with Iran.
 
We should care what these people think?

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times
Wow, so your argument is that because the Shah's father was pals with the Nazis, that somehow makes the Ayatollah's Nazis... or something.

Wait a minute. So I said the Pahlavi Dynasty that both of you support deserved to be overthrown, and you just pointed out the Pahlavis were Nazi stooges?

Okay, here's a reality check for you guys. Iran has a Jewish Community of some 25,000. No one is turning them into lampshades.

IRAN Life of Jews Living in Iran

While Jewish communities in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Morocco and Algeria have all but vanished, Iran is home to 25,000 - some here say 35,000 - Jews. The Jewish population is less than half the number that lived here before the Islamic revolution of 1979. But the Jews have tried to compensate for their diminishing numbers by adopting a new religious fervor.

''The funny thing is that before the Islamic revolution, you would see maybe 20 old men in the synagogue,'' whispers Nahit Eliyason, 48, as she climbs over four other women to find one of the few vacant seats. ''Now the place is full. You can barely find a seat.'' Parvis Yashaya, a film producer who heads Tehran's Jewish community, adds: ''We are smaller, but we are stronger in some ways.''

Tehran has 11 functioning synagogues, many of them with Hebrew schools. It has two kosher restaurants, and a Jewish hospital, an old-age home and a cemetery. There is a Jewish representative in the Iranian parliament. There is a Jewish library with 20,000 titles, its reading room decorated with a photograph of the Ayatollah Khomeini.



1. "Wow, so your argument is....blah blah blah...."
Argument???

I have no argument.....I just dropped in to prove you know less than nothing about the topic.....

.....but, actually, you were doing a pretty good job of proving that all by your lonesome.



2. "...somehow makes the Ayatollah's Nazis... or something."

Pick up a book once in a while.

Of course the ayatollah's are totalitarians....just as Nazis, communists, fascists, Liberals, socialists, etc., are.


3. Now, for background, and your further education:

  1. Communism was the first of the new mass movements in Europe, and the first to flourish in the Middle East as well. Europe’s Fascist and fascist-style movements began in the years after World War One. The major difference was that Communists and Marxists, aimed to show how similar they were in every country…the Fascists’ aims were to show how local and parochial, how ‘nationalist’ and ancient its interests were.
    1. Baath Socialism had its myth of man and history, the Arab nation was it’s people of God, corrupted and polluted by forces within and forces without.
    2. From Michel Aflaq, the founder and greatest of the Baathi theoreticians: The philosophies and teachings that come from the West invade the Arab mind and steal his loyalty.”
    3. And the people of evil who corrupted the nation of God, were, of course, the Jews. Pan-Arabists of one kind or another were responsible for the anti-Semitic outbreaks of the ‘40’s and ‘60’s.
    4. The Arabs, in this projection, would return to their “pure, original nature” by revering the revolutionary Leader who embodied the “Arab Spirit,” the spirit one embodied in the Prophet Muhammad himself. This meant unlimited mass obedience, and this implied following the political organization, or the state. This view was not only totalitarian, but anther element that traces back to the Enlightenment- nihilism. Covered in
      “Terror and Liberalism,” by Paul Berman

If you ask nicely I may provide a post on Sayyid Qutb, the single most influential Islamist writer. His masterwork was “In the Shade of the Qur’an.”
Look it up.

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times


You may have a point!!!

Philadelphia on May 13, 1985, right here in the US of A, Democrats burned down a whole block in Philadelphia!

They killed 11 people, including 5 children


I can't wait for your vituperation filled post condemning the Democrats!

Go for it, boyyyyeeeeee!

You know, an old Korean woman incoherently jabbering like a monkey is quite cliché.



Ohhhhh,,,,,,so you really don't care about that baby killed, or the 11 others that I noted....

....and you are deathly afraid of criticizing the Democrats for those murders.

I get it.


Too bad Jakal already has the title 'fakey'.....you could have taken it, huh?

What I get is that you tacitly supported the murder of those Palestinians.
 
The agreement doesn't require them to dismantle anything,

Actually it does...

Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Under the agreement, Iran agreed to eliminate its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium, cut its stockpile of low-enriched uranium by 98%, and reduce by about two-thirds the number of its centrifuges for at least fifteen years. For the next fifteen years, Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67%. Iran also agreed not to build any new uranium-enriching or heavy-water facilities over the same period. Uranium-enrichment activities will be limited to a single facility using first-generation centrifuges for ten years. Other facilities will be converted to avoid proliferation risks. To monitor and verify Iran's compliance with the agreement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will have regular access to all Iranian nuclear facilities. The agreement provides that in return for verifiably abiding by its commitments, Iran will receive relief from U.S., European Union, and United Nations Security Council nuclear-related sanctions.

and the so-called inspections are a farce.

  • The IAEA will have multilayered[44] oversight "over Iran's entire nuclear supply chain, from uranium mills to its procurement of nuclear-related technologies."[45] For declared nuclear sites such as Fordow and Natanz, the IAEA will have "round-the-clock access" to nuclear facilities and will be entitled to maintain continuous monitoring (including via surveillance equipment) at such sites.[45][46] The agreement authorizes the IAEA to make use of sophisticated monitoring technology, such as fiber-optic seals on equipment that can electronically send information to the IAEA; infrared satellite imagery to detect covert sites, "environmental sensors that can detect minute signs of nuclear particles"; tamper-resistant, radiation-resistant cameras.[30][47] Other tools include computerized accounting programs to gather information and detect anomalies, and big data sets on Iranian imports, to monitor dual-use items.[44]
  • The number of IAEA inspectors assigned to Iran will triple, from 50 to 150 inspectors.

Why is it you leftist want to strengthen our enemies and weaken our allies.

Why do you keep insisting the Zionists are our friends or the Iranians are our enemies? We don't have a dog or a God in this fight over who an Imaginary Sky Pixie promised a strip of desert to? Frankly,I think it's kind of silly to tell the Iranians they can't have Nukes when the Zionists haven't signed the NPT and have been lying bout their nuclear program for decades.

Clinton gave the Chinese missile technology

No, big corporations gave them that because they needed to put satellites in the sky cheaply. I'm more worried about the jobs that Bush sent over to China than some missile technology. It's not like the Chinese are going to nuke their best customers.


you people are really nutjobs

No, guy, a nutjob is someone who steals someone else's land because an imaginary Pixie in the sky told him to, andthen insists the REST OF THE WORLD put up with the wars and economic disruptions they instigate.

The rest of the world isn't playing along, which is why we have a sensible agreement with Iran.
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

No, big corporations gave them that because they needed to put satellites in the sky cheaply. I'm more worried about the jobs that Bush sent over to China than some missile technology. It's not like the Chinese are going to nuke their best customers.

Clinton Overrules Secretary of State

The alleged improper export by Hughes of satellite technology was cited as a key
reason when Clinton's secretary of state, Warren Christopher, rejected a plan to
give the Commerce Department full authority to control satellite exports.

According to a Sept. 22, 1995, memorandum, Christopher rejected plans to give
Commerce the authority to approve satellite exports after an interagency study
noted that "significant" military and intelligence capabilities could be lost.

The memorandum stated the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies strongly
opposed the policy change because Hughes exported two satellites with sensitive
cryptographic technology without first getting a State Department munitions
license. Cryptographic technology is used to scramble communications sent to
satellites to prevent unauthorized access.

President Clinton, who transferred the power to regulate sensitive satellites to
Commerce, under Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, ultimately overruled Christopher.

Clinton's transfer allowed the Chinese army to acquire advanced U.S. technology
for military purposes. Hughes satellites currently provide the Chinese army with
secure communications that are invulnerable to earth combat and highly accurate
all-weather navigation for strike bombers and missiles.

Hughes satellites purchased by Shen also provide direct TV and cable TV
broadcasts to most of Asia. Thus, cable and pay-per-view services help pay for
the Chinese army satellite communications. The brilliant planning and logistics
mean that Chinese military communications pay for themselves.

Clinton Legacy - A New Arms Race

The satellite and missile technology obtained from Hughes by the Chinese army is
critical for the design and manufacture of missile nose cones and electronic
missile control systems. The technology clearly helped the Chinese army field a
new generation of ICBMS, including the Dong Feng 31 missile, which can drop
three nuclear warheads on any city in the U.S.

The success of Shen is a story of missiles, politics and greed. Gen. Shen
succeeded in using Hughes and President Clinton as valuable tools to obtain
weapons that are now pointed at the United States.

China won and the U.S. lost what may very well be the first round of World War
III. Gen. Shen led that victory and he did it with a checkbook. The Clinton
legacy for the 21st century is a new arms race.


Clinton and Chinese Missiles
 
We should care what these people think?

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times
1. "Wow, so your argument is....blah blah blah...."
Argument???

I have no argument.....I just dropped in to prove you know less than nothing about the topic.....

.....but, actually, you were doing a pretty good job of proving that all by your lonesome.



2. "...somehow makes the Ayatollah's Nazis... or something."

Pick up a book once in a while.

Of course the ayatollah's are totalitarians....just as Nazis, communists, fascists, Liberals, socialists, etc., are.


3. Now, for background, and your further education:

  1. Communism was the first of the new mass movements in Europe, and the first to flourish in the Middle East as well. Europe’s Fascist and fascist-style movements began in the years after World War One. The major difference was that Communists and Marxists, aimed to show how similar they were in every country…the Fascists’ aims were to show how local and parochial, how ‘nationalist’ and ancient its interests were.
    1. Baath Socialism had its myth of man and history, the Arab nation was it’s people of God, corrupted and polluted by forces within and forces without.
    2. From Michel Aflaq, the founder and greatest of the Baathi theoreticians: The philosophies and teachings that come from the West invade the Arab mind and steal his loyalty.”
    3. And the people of evil who corrupted the nation of God, were, of course, the Jews. Pan-Arabists of one kind or another were responsible for the anti-Semitic outbreaks of the ‘40’s and ‘60’s.
    4. The Arabs, in this projection, would return to their “pure, original nature” by revering the revolutionary Leader who embodied the “Arab Spirit,” the spirit one embodied in the Prophet Muhammad himself. This meant unlimited mass obedience, and this implied following the political organization, or the state. This view was not only totalitarian, but anther element that traces back to the Enlightenment- nihilism. Covered in
      “Terror and Liberalism,” by Paul Berman

If you ask nicely I may provide a post on Sayyid Qutb, the single most influential Islamist writer. His masterwork was “In the Shade of the Qur’an.”
Look it up.

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times


You may have a point!!!

Philadelphia on May 13, 1985, right here in the US of A, Democrats burned down a whole block in Philadelphia!

They killed 11 people, including 5 children


I can't wait for your vituperation filled post condemning the Democrats!

Go for it, boyyyyeeeeee!

You know, an old Korean woman incoherently jabbering like a monkey is quite cliché.



Ohhhhh,,,,,,so you really don't care about that baby killed, or the 11 others that I noted....

....and you are deathly afraid of criticizing the Democrats for those murders.

I get it.


Too bad Jakal already has the title 'fakey'.....you could have taken it, huh?

What I get is that you tacitly supported the murder of those Palestinians.

I'm sure you want to belive that. When you keep making up stories about those scary wepaons that never get made, you need some kind of lame excuse when the wolf never shows up.
it's a Jewish conspiracy:eusa_shhh:
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.
 
We should care what these people think?

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times
1. "Wow, so your argument is....blah blah blah...."
Argument???

I have no argument.....I just dropped in to prove you know less than nothing about the topic.....

.....but, actually, you were doing a pretty good job of proving that all by your lonesome.



2. "...somehow makes the Ayatollah's Nazis... or something."

Pick up a book once in a while.

Of course the ayatollah's are totalitarians....just as Nazis, communists, fascists, Liberals, socialists, etc., are.


3. Now, for background, and your further education:

  1. Communism was the first of the new mass movements in Europe, and the first to flourish in the Middle East as well. Europe’s Fascist and fascist-style movements began in the years after World War One. The major difference was that Communists and Marxists, aimed to show how similar they were in every country…the Fascists’ aims were to show how local and parochial, how ‘nationalist’ and ancient its interests were.
    1. Baath Socialism had its myth of man and history, the Arab nation was it’s people of God, corrupted and polluted by forces within and forces without.
    2. From Michel Aflaq, the founder and greatest of the Baathi theoreticians: The philosophies and teachings that come from the West invade the Arab mind and steal his loyalty.”
    3. And the people of evil who corrupted the nation of God, were, of course, the Jews. Pan-Arabists of one kind or another were responsible for the anti-Semitic outbreaks of the ‘40’s and ‘60’s.
    4. The Arabs, in this projection, would return to their “pure, original nature” by revering the revolutionary Leader who embodied the “Arab Spirit,” the spirit one embodied in the Prophet Muhammad himself. This meant unlimited mass obedience, and this implied following the political organization, or the state. This view was not only totalitarian, but anther element that traces back to the Enlightenment- nihilism. Covered in
      “Terror and Liberalism,” by Paul Berman

If you ask nicely I may provide a post on Sayyid Qutb, the single most influential Islamist writer. His masterwork was “In the Shade of the Qur’an.”
Look it up.

Palestinian toddler burned to death in attack by suspected Israeli extremists - LA Times


You may have a point!!!

Philadelphia on May 13, 1985, right here in the US of A, Democrats burned down a whole block in Philadelphia!

They killed 11 people, including 5 children


I can't wait for your vituperation filled post condemning the Democrats!

Go for it, boyyyyeeeeee!

You know, an old Korean woman incoherently jabbering like a monkey is quite cliché.



Ohhhhh,,,,,,so you really don't care about that baby killed, or the 11 others that I noted....

....and you are deathly afraid of criticizing the Democrats for those murders.

I get it.


Too bad Jakal already has the title 'fakey'.....you could have taken it, huh?

What I get is that you tacitly supported the murder of those Palestinians.



Yeah....but your a liar and a moron.
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?


IF THE US PRESIDENT WAS JUDICIOUS , RIGHTEOUS AND INFORMED HE WOULD COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM THE AUTHORITY TO MEDDLE INTO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - SO HE CAN NOT MONITOR IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM NOR MILITARILY OR FINANCIALLY ASSIST YOUR NATIVE ISRAHELL.



.
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?


IF THE US PRESIDENT WAS JUDICIOUS , RIGHTEOUS AND INFORMED HE WOULD COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM THE AUTHORITY TO MEDDLE INTO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - SO HE CAN NOT MONITOR IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM NOR MILITARILY OR FINANCIALLY ASSIST YOUR NATIVE ISRAHELL.



.


Possibly you could make that font just a bit larger....

...and, could you explain how the term "commander in chief" is unrelated to intercourse with other nations.


BTW...I'm not from Israel.

My "native" land is somewhat east of there.
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?


IF THE US PRESIDENT WAS JUDICIOUS , RIGHTEOUS AND INFORMED HE WOULD COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM THE AUTHORITY TO MEDDLE INTO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - SO HE CAN NOT MONITOR IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM NOR MILITARILY OR FINANCIALLY ASSIST YOUR NATIVE ISRAHELL.



.


Possibly you could make that font just a bit larger....

...and, could you explain how the term "commander in chief" is unrelated to intercourse with other nations.


BTW...I'm not from Israel.

My "native" land is somewhat east of there.

But you're a Jewish conservative.
 
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?


IF THE US PRESIDENT WAS JUDICIOUS , RIGHTEOUS AND INFORMED HE WOULD COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM THE AUTHORITY TO MEDDLE INTO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - SO HE CAN NOT MONITOR IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM NOR MILITARILY OR FINANCIALLY ASSIST YOUR NATIVE ISRAHELL.



.


Possibly you could make that font just a bit larger....

...and, could you explain how the term "commander in chief" is unrelated to intercourse with other nations.


BTW...I'm not from Israel.

My "native" land is somewhat east of there.
Wikipedia?..LOL.... What's in those side deal again?:dunno: and nothing gets dismanlted... "around the clock access"? who put that in there you? there are no snap inspections. 24 day delay after a notice, no U.S. inspectors

Why do they have to be US inspectors?

Frankly, if you are going to have inspections, they should be a neutral third party.

Sorry, man, we just aren't going to say "how High" anymore when the Jews say "Jump".

This is a good deal. So the Republicans will make some noise about it for the Bible thumping morons in their base who think we need Israel so Jesus can come back, but the rest of the world will say, "Well Done"



No Sir.


When Chief Zionut , Bibi , says jump, the US president is supposed to respond by saying "How High"

That 's the law.



.


If the individuals at issue were both judicious, righteous, and informed individuals.....

....would that be a bad thing?


IF THE US PRESIDENT WAS JUDICIOUS , RIGHTEOUS AND INFORMED HE WOULD COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT

THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM THE AUTHORITY TO MEDDLE INTO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS - SO HE CAN NOT MONITOR IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM NOR MILITARILY OR FINANCIALLY ASSIST YOUR NATIVE ISRAHELL.



.


Possibly you could make that font just a bit larger....

...and, could you explain how the term "commander in chief" is unrelated to intercourse with other nations.


BTW...I'm not from Israel.

My "native" land is somewhat east of there.



BELIEVE ME I HAVE TRIED TO USE A LARGER FONT IN ORDER TO PENETRATE YOUR THICK STUPID/NARCOTIZED SKULLS.


IN THE US THE CIC IS SUPPOSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTITUTION - BUT THAT IS NO LONGER THE CASE - THEY DO WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT TO DO TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FACT THAT AFTER 12 YEARS OF GOVERNMENT "EDUCATION" THE PEOPLE ARE FUBR
 
Here's what's going to happen, once Iran has a nuke they will quadruple their sponsorship of terrorists and threaten to launch a nuke if anyone tries to do anything about it, that's the end game.
 
Here's what's going to happen, once Iran has a nuke they will quadruple their sponsorship of terrorists and threaten to launch a nuke if anyone tries to do anything about it, that's the end game.



DINGALING


THE US HAS BEEN MEDDLING IN IRAN'S INTERNAL AFFAIRS SINCE THE 1950's WITH DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.

SO DO YOU BLAME THEM?


/
 
Here's what's going to happen, once Iran has a nuke they will quadruple their sponsorship of terrorists and threaten to launch a nuke if anyone tries to do anything about it, that's the end game.



DINGALING


THE US HAS BEEN MEDDLING IN IRAN'S INTERNAL AFFAIRS SINCE THE 1950's WITH DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.

SO DO YOU BLAME THEM?


/

Evil big mouthed punk nations like Iran should expect to get bullied by the USA, those Iranians are real assholes.
 
Here's what's going to happen, once Iran has a nuke they will quadruple their sponsorship of terrorists and threaten to launch a nuke if anyone tries to do anything about it, that's the end game.



DINGALING


THE US HAS BEEN MEDDLING IN IRAN'S INTERNAL AFFAIRS SINCE THE 1950's WITH DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.

SO DO YOU BLAME THEM?


/

Evil big mouthed punk nations like Iran should expect to get bullied by the USA, those Iranians are real assholes.


WHAT THE FUCK WAS IRAN DOING IN THE 1950's WHICH IS CONSIDERED BY YOU STUPID FUCKS AS A "PUNK NATION"?


OH WAIT , YOU ARE FROM TELAVIV.

REST MY CASE.



.
 

Forum List

Back
Top