James Carville sounds the alarm as Sanders surges in primary: 'I'm scared to death' for Democrats

[Ray From Cleveland]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Plugs will not fare well against Trump in the general.

The MSM is lowering expectations on Biden so as they can herald is great come back in South Carolina. The MSM knows that his only competition for the nomination is Sanders at this point in time, and they also know that Sanders can win Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada, yet still be trailing Biden easily after South Carolina. The MSM also knows Mayor Pete put all of his eggs in Iowa, and from here on out; much like Santorum was, it is all over.

Let me finish by saying-------------->Biden IS the candidate that Trump would have the most problems with, not because of anything Biden does, but because the Left sees him as an extension of Obama. He will run proclaiming a 3rd term of Obama, trust me.

If Biden IS the nominee, the Left will not paint this as Biden V Trump, they are going to paint it as-----------> Obama policies V Trump policies. Biden is the one candidate that can claim this mantle, and while many GOPers will snicker at what I just wrote, remember that for over 2 years the Left through narratives, had their people believing that Trump was in the KGB, lol. I mean look at the Lefts narratives all over this board and tell us what they have to do with facts! And these people SPOUT the nonsense, and actually some BELIEVE it!

Trust me, be careful what you wish for! With a Sanders surge happening, if Biden can show strength of any kind, ALL of the Democrat establishment besides the Bernie Bros are going to get right behind him. Doubt me? Watch the narrative after South Carolina!

The REAL test for Biden and Bernie comes in California. Whoever/whomever wins CA will lead going into the convention, as long as something dramatic doesn't derail their campaign.

Interesting analysis and you made some good points.

The one thing I would disagree with is regarding "the MSM lowering expectations for Biden", Biden DOES have some serious issues at this point, the biggest one being money his campaign is low on funds and after his disappointing performance in Iowa he *may* have some issues refilling his campaign coffers to the level that will be needed to get past South Carolina. IMHO His candidacy isn't dead by any means but it's been severely wounded because his performance in Iowa was ABYSSMAL, he can't afford a repeat in NH and NV, else he might find that his donors going elsewhere.

He only has Piglosi and Schiff Face to thank for it. They made such a big deal out of nothing, and now everybody has been focused on this Biden/ Burisma thing for the last couple of months. Had they just left it alone, it would have been a story that died in a day or two.

I'll never understand why these leftists keep cutting off their nose to spite their face. It's like they never seem to learn anything. Their greed is such that when they're riding down a hill towards a cliff, they only want to go faster. It's like they have zero common sense.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Bernie is not really interested in winning. He's happier using his position to get more stuff from the dem plantation. If he wanted to make a difference, he'd start a new democrat Socialist workers Party. Not that its really new, but it tries to differentiate from CPUSA or Socialist Party.

He's waiting for Bloomberg to make him "an offer with 8 figures in it this time. It's my last election and I want to cash out"

I really believe that the only reason he is running is to try and have some protection over his and his sons corruption.

 

[Desperado]

Toward the end of the interview Carville said that no matter who the candidate turned out to be he would vote for them. So he is just another hack that put party over country

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

 

[Desperado]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

Certainly explains why out politicians are so willing to give out foreign aid...... An investigation need to be conducted on in every case to see if there is anyone receiving kickbacks from the foreign aid recipient

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Carvelle is barking up the wrong tree. His party isn't going to allow Sanders to be their nominee. The fix is well under way. They have already decided on the old, White, establishment midget billionaire.

Perhaps, but if they rig the election against Sander's again, it's going to leave a lot of pissed off voters on the Democrat side. That would guarantee a Trump win.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

Certainly explains why out politicians are so willing to give out foreign aid...... An investigation need to be conducted on in every case to see if there is anyone receiving kickbacks from the foreign aid recipient

Yes, but look at what happened to the guy that actually tired to do that.

 

[pknopp]

Sanders is basically running on Obama's platform. I'd like to ask Carville if he knew before hand that Obama was lying.

 

[LaDairis]

Certainly explains why out politicians are so willing to give out foreign aid...... An investigation need to be conducted on in every case to see if there is anyone receiving kickbacks from the foreign aid recipient

Yeah, starting with the Bill Clinton Administration, the pay for play standard.

 

[alang1216]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

I'm relieved to know that the most corrupt family in the country are the Bidens. Once they're gone crime should drop precipitously.

 

[Desperado]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

I'm relieved to know that the most corrupt family in the country are the Bidens. Once they're gone crime should drop precipitously.

It will drop even more once the Clintons are history

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So are all of them his political rivals, and if they were up to no good in the past, all have immunity from their suspicious activities being looked into simply because they are running for the nomination?

No one should have immunity because they are running for the nomination. On the other hand, no one should be investigated just because they are running for the nomination.

That's not why Trump did it. Why would he be concerned about the easiest guy to beat in a debate? If anything, he would have suppressed any info coming out of Ukraine on Biden.

Immunity is what we are talking about here, because in spite of Trump stating why he did it, the Democrats decided that they could read minds, and Trump's mind was thinking it was because Biden was a political rival.

The corruption of how many people who were not running for the nomination was Trump concerned about investigating?

Nobody else because if anybody else was involved in anything, they certainly didn't make it this obvious. A drug addict getting a job for 83K a month doing nothing, no experience in the field, no experience in the country, and then the guy that was fired came out and stated his firing was exclusively about Burisma and Hunter. Then you look at other connections to Joe's vice presidency and see even more of a pattern.

John Biden, Joe's brother, had no experience in the construction field. He was given a high paying position with a construction company, that afterword landed a 1.5 billion dollar government project.

None of this was supposed to be known because Hillary was expected to take the presidency blindfolded. So the Democrats were extremely careless about the antics they were involved in.

I'm relieved to know that the most corrupt family in the country are the Bidens. Once they're gone crime should drop precipitously.

Nobody ever said they were the most corrupt in the country, but it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

 

[LaDairis]

it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

and most of that corruption still remains hidden from the American people, thanks to Jeff Sessions and Rod the Mossad Rosenstein....


obama silence climate 2010 2012 - Google Search


For example, Cocksucker Obama went "silent" from 2010 to 2012 about climate change = SILENT. One article says EPA secretary Lisa Jackson claimed Obama "doesn't believe in Global Warming," but that article, cited by me and others, has been deleted....

and then the two GAY MEN, Barack and Michael Robinson, buy a BEACHFRONT property on Martha's Vineyard, proving

1. they don't believe the oceans are rising
2. they don't believe canes are getting more powerful and more frequent, or, more precisely, they know the oceans aren't warming

 

[alang1216]

Nobody ever said they were the most corrupt in the country, but it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

I'm sure it did but it seems more than mere coincidence that Trump was concerned about Hillary's corruption ('lock her up') only while she was running against him and now that Biden may run against him he has shifted his focus to him. Did he ever even try to lock her up or were his accusations just slander?

 

[toobfreak]

Democratic strategist James Carville expressed his concerns as the Democratic primary race is officially underway, saying he's "scared to death" of the direction his party is going.

Appearing on MSNBC, Carville began by pointing to the success Democrats had during the 2018 midterm elections and stressed that it "matters" who the candidates are and what the party chooses to talk about.

"I'm 75 years old, why am I here doing this? Because I'm scared to death, that's why," Carville exclaimed. "Let's get relevant here ... all the Sanders people are taking pictures wishing Jeremy Corbyn the best. ... I don't want to go down that path."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

---------

If Carville is suddenly being resurrected , then Hillary cant be too far away... take that to the bank.... she is DEFINITELY going to be available UNLES Trump is able to see it coming and gets Barr to investigate and indict her in the next 8 months.... fairly impossible BUT AN INVESTIGATION would probably do the trick.... use the Comey charges and finally indict that corrupt badtard!

Now you know why they've kept Trump busy and distracted these past 4 years! Meantime, Hillary is attacking Bernie again!

 

[alang1216]

it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

and most of that corruption still remains hidden from the American people, thanks to Jeff Sessions and Rod the Mossad Rosenstein....

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, Republican United States attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, Senator, early Trump supporter, and appointed by Trump to be the AG, was a closet member of the Blue State! Who knew? That was some deep cover.

 

[BluesLegend]

THE ONLY REASON THEY REGAINED THE HOUSE IN 2018 WAS BLAMING THE CHAOS THEY WERE CAUSING ON TRUMP AND CONVINCING PEOPLE THE ONLY WAY CIVILITY COULD BE RESTORED IN WASHINGTON WAS WITH THEM

AND many Dems who ran in red districts vacated by retiring Republicans LIED and promised voters they would support Trump's policies.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nobody ever said they were the most corrupt in the country, but it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

I'm sure it did but it seems more than mere coincidence that Trump was concerned about Hillary's corruption ('lock her up') only while she was running against him and now that Biden may run against him he has shifted his focus to him. Did he ever even try to lock her up or were his accusations just slander?

There is a difference between going after your opponent, and going after somebody that might one day be your opponent. You can't say that a potential political opponent is off limits no matter what sleazy things they did in their past simply for that reason.

So who created this political opponent lie? The Democrat party of course, the party of lying. Not only did they create the lie, they actually impeached a US President over the lie, thus the beginning of the new impeachment war.

Now the party of liars stated that Trump is hiding something because he's not cooperating them in their scheme, yet flew into action when they found out he was looking at the Biden situation. They told us if Trump had nothing to hide, he would cooperate, while at the same time, telling us that the Biden's are off limits. Well if the Biden's and the Commie party have nothing to hide, why does it trouble them so much that Trump is looking into it? Use the same standard for yourself that you demand of others.

 

[alang1216]

Nobody ever said they were the most corrupt in the country, but it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

I'm sure it did but it seems more than mere coincidence that Trump was concerned about Hillary's corruption ('lock her up') only while she was running against him and now that Biden may run against him he has shifted his focus to him. Did he ever even try to lock her up or were his accusations just slander?

There is a difference between going after your opponent, and going after somebody that might one day be your opponent. You can't say that a potential political opponent is off limits no matter what sleazy things they did in their past simply for that reason.

So who created this political opponent lie? The Democrat party of course, the party of lying. Not only did they create the lie, they actually impeached a US President over the lie, thus the beginning of the new impeachment war.

Now the party of liars stated that Trump is hiding something because he's not cooperating them in their scheme, yet flew into action when they found out he was looking at the Biden situation. They told us if Trump had nothing to hide, he would cooperate, while at the same time, telling us that the Biden's are off limits. Well if the Biden's and the Commie party have nothing to hide, why does it trouble them so much that Trump is looking into it? Use the same standard for yourself that you demand of others.

First off, there is NO difference between going after your opponent, and going after somebody that might one day be your opponent. No one said the Bidens are off limits, only that the DOJ is the proper mechanism to investigate them, not a foreign government that is indebted to Trump for aid and favors.

Well if Trump and the GOP party have nothing to hide, why does it trouble them so much that the Dems are looking into it? Use the same standard for yourself that you demand of others.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nobody ever said they were the most corrupt in the country, but it seems corruption took place during the Obama administration.

I'm sure it did but it seems more than mere coincidence that Trump was concerned about Hillary's corruption ('lock her up') only while she was running against him and now that Biden may run against him he has shifted his focus to him. Did he ever even try to lock her up or were his accusations just slander?

There is a difference between going after your opponent, and going after somebody that might one day be your opponent. You can't say that a potential political opponent is off limits no matter what sleazy things they did in their past simply for that reason.

So who created this political opponent lie? The Democrat party of course, the party of lying. Not only did they create the lie, they actually impeached a US President over the lie, thus the beginning of the new impeachment war.

Now the party of liars stated that Trump is hiding something because he's not cooperating them in their scheme, yet flew into action when they found out he was looking at the Biden situation. They told us if Trump had nothing to hide, he would cooperate, while at the same time, telling us that the Biden's are off limits. Well if the Biden's and the Commie party have nothing to hide, why does it trouble them so much that Trump is looking into it? Use the same standard for yourself that you demand of others.

First off, there is NO difference between going after your opponent, and going after somebody that might one day be your opponent. No one said the Bidens are off limits, only that the DOJ is the proper mechanism to investigate them, not a foreign government that is indebted to Trump for aid and favors.

Well if Trump and the GOP party have nothing to hide, why does it trouble them so much that the Dems are looking into it? Use the same standard for yourself that you demand of others.

We didn't create that standard--you people did. Just read any discussion here about Trump not giving them what they want.

Even if the DOJ is the right way to go, that doesn't preclude a President from asking a foreign leader if they can look into the matter. Trump never demanded it, never threatened anybody, just asked for a favor. A US President has the legal ability to look into any matter of possible corruption by a former representative.

No, a potential political opponent is not the same as a political opponent. And the commies never used the word "potential" once. So why did they use political opponent? Because that was the excuse they needed to impeach the President, because even they know that it's perfectly legal for a President to look into such things.