Is this the best America could give us?

JakeWIlls92

Gold Member
Apr 6, 2014
1,746
160
130
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?
 
Look at what our media does to candidates.

Look at what other candidates do to them.

Look at what the internet does to them.

Look at what they have to do to raise money just to run.

Our real Best & Brightest know to stay the fuck out of politics.
.
 
Last edited:
We get what we deserve.
Bullshit.


The CFR, the media, and the establishment will decide who you deserve.

These were the men and women that declared for the Republicans. The media and the CFR decided if you ever got to know about them depending on if they were acceptable to the elites.

Republican Candidates
Republican Presidential Candidates 2016 | sorted alphabetically
Skip Andrews
George Bailey
Michael Bickelmeyer
Kerry Bowers
Jeb Bush
Ben Carson
Eric Cavanagh
Dale Christensen
Chris Christie ◄ WITHDRAWN
Ted Cruz
Brooks Cullison
John Dummett, Jr.
Mark Everson ◄ WITHDRAWN
Jack Fellure
Carly Fiorina ◄ WITHDRAWN
Jim Gilmore ◄ WITHDRAWN
Lindsey Graham ◄ WITHDRAWN
Jim Hayden
Chris Hill
Mike Huckabee ◄ WITHDRAWN
Bobby Jindal ◄ WITHDRAWN
John Kasich
Valma Kittington
Andy Martin
Peter Messina
James C. Mitchell, Jr.
K. Ross Newland
Esteban Oliverez
George Pataki ◄ WITHDRAWN
Rand Paul ◄ WITHDRAWN
Rick Perry ◄ WITHDRAWN
Michael Petyo
Marco Rubio
Brian Russell
Rick Santorum ◄ WITHDRAWN
Jefferson Sherman
Donald Trump
Scott Walker ◄ WITHDRAWN

And that's just the Republicans. Imagine how many other folks are out there that are running that no one knows about, b/c they don't have the "right" POV on issues for the elites.

You don't get to decide.

What, did you think you live in, a "democracy?"

22yk7.gif
 
Last edited:
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

yes, because the other side giving us a former communist and a person with enough baggage to fill a train is much better.

At least the Republicans aren't trying to pretend this election is taking place in 2004.
 
Look at what our media does to candidates.

Look at what other candidates do to them.

Look at what they have to do to raise money just to run.

Our real Best & Brightest know to stay the fuck out of politics.
.

Add in the decline in knowledge of the electorate (from both parties) and you get where we are now.

Things won't change until people start feeling direct impacts to their lives (and judging by the apathy in places like Detroit, maybe not even then).
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

Jake of the 57 States Party criticizes his betters... Lol
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

It sounds so damn partisan when people make these types of posts. The reason it does is because it is nothing but left wing partisan BS. I have to assume you don't give a crap about who is nominated and NO ONE gave you anyone to vote for.

The reason Trump and Cruz has traction is because the left wing has nominated two senior citizens. Two white senior citizens. One, Mrs. Bosnia Clinton has been proven over and over to lie or she is delusional, you pick. Sanders is a socialist.

So if that is the choices on the D side every aholes like Trump are going to look good on the R side.

Besides, at least on the R side there are choices and they all vary in political persuasion and racial make up.
 
Referring to post #4:

Most of the above are egotistical worthless Republican attention seekers.
No reason to think that the Democrat roster is any different.

Sad fact is that one will be President.
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

If Progressives like yourself had not killed state rights and given the Executive Branch so much damned power then it would not be such an issue, would it?

But alas, they create what basically amounts to as a king and then cry about possibly having a "bad" king?

Well guess what dingleberry, it will happen eventually.
 
they probably think the TWO old crusty Democrats running are the best of the best.

it's ONLY the Republicans they mainly attack. so that should give you a clue
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

yes, because the other side giving us a former communist and a person with enough baggage to fill a train is much better.

At least the Republicans aren't trying to pretend this election is taking place in 2004.

Speaking of the other side. . . .

Democratic Candidates
Democratic Presidential Candidates 2016
Howell Astor
Joe Biden ◄ DECLINED
Morrison Bonpasse
Jeff Boss
Harry Braun
Andy Caffrey
Willie Carter
Lincoln Chafee ◄ WITHDRAWN
Hillary Clinton
Lloyd Kelso
Roque de La Fuente
Larry Lessig ◄ WITHDRAWN
Martin O'Malley ◄ WITHDRAWN
Bernie Sanders
Doug Shreffler
Michael Steinberg
Jim Webb ◄ WITHDRAWN
Robby Wells
Willie Wilson
Brad Winslow
 
they probably think the TWO old crusty Democrats running are the best of the best.

it's ONLY the Republicans they mainly attack. so that should give you a clue

Well he seems pleased as punch with them both.

Just as long as people keep voting "D" we can maintain our wonderful Obama utopia.
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

yes, because the other side giving us a former communist and a person with enough baggage to fill a train is much better.

At least the Republicans aren't trying to pretend this election is taking place in 2004.

A "former Communist"? I think he's a Communist currently.
 
the Republicans don't have someone barking like sick rabid dog at least. good grief take this women off the stage already
Hillary Barking Like a Dog

 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

yes, because the other side giving us a former communist and a person with enough baggage to fill a train is much better.

At least the Republicans aren't trying to pretend this election is taking place in 2004.

Speaking of the other side. . . .

Democratic Candidates
Democratic Presidential Candidates 2016

Howell Astor
Joe Biden ◄ DECLINED
Morrison Bonpasse
Jeff Boss
Harry Braun
Andy Caffrey
Willie Carter
Lincoln Chafee ◄ WITHDRAWN
Hillary Clinton
Lloyd Kelso
Roque de La Fuente
Larry Lessig ◄ WITHDRAWN
Martin O'Malley ◄ WITHDRAWN
Bernie Sanders
Doug Shreffler
Michael Steinberg
Jim Webb ◄ WITHDRAWN
Robby Wells
Willie Wilson
Brad Winslow

Same as for the Republicans: Egotistical worthless attention seekers with the exception of Joe Biden.
 
The top candidates for a major political party are a billionaire bully who inherited his wealth who feels laws do not apply to him, and a psychotic Evangelical Dominionist/Rapturist.

Is that the best you could give us?

yes, because the other side giving us a former communist and a person with enough baggage to fill a train is much better.

At least the Republicans aren't trying to pretend this election is taking place in 2004.

A "former Communist"? I think he's a Communist currently.

There is a big difference between Obama and a communist. A communist admits that business is state owned as where a Progressive like Obama pretends they are not until they need bailed out but still don't admit to it.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top