Is it necessary to legalize marriages with dogs?

[ABikerSailor]

In general, natural stupidity and autism are essentially mental illnesses. If a person believes that the Yahweh created the world in 7 days, or that there may be some kind of "same-sex marriage", this is also a question of psychiatrists. And if our psychiatrists were not mentally ill themselves, they would diagnose at least 50% of the population, at least all leftists.

If natural stupidity were a mental illness as you appear to believe, you might want to go see a psychiatrist as soon as you can, as your stupidity kinda shows in your posts. As far as belief that God (or Y--weh as you called Him) created the world and marriage being the same thing? Sorry, serious fail on that. One is a belief (creation of the world), and the other (marriage) is a man made construct. But, keep trolling, as there are some crazy people on here who might respond to your posts in a manner that you desire, but I kinda doubt it, because, as I said, your Troll Fu sucks ass.

 

[rupol2000]

Here in America, we don't have as many bat shit crazy people as yours apparently does. No, we don't require a mental exam to buy a gun (although in some cases, maybe it would have been helpful), to drive a car, etc. (which means and so on). While many people in this country do know and see psychiatrists, it's more for issues they have (or think) they have, and they aren't required by our government to do so for daily life. Military enlistment doesn't really require one, but for some of the special programs or duties a military person might wish to join or do, some require it.

Yes, that's why I believe that the USA in the past was a right-wing patriarchal country, a great country in which people were not considered cattle and trusted them with everything without checks. But that's in the past now. If the left has reached the legalization of same-sex marriage, they will soon ban everything and will drive Americans on short leashes.

 

[rupol2000]

. As far as belief that God (or Y--weh as you called Him) created the world and marriage being the same thing?

From one category obscurantism

 

[rupol2000]

Marriage is the legal union of a couple as spouses - This is legal definition of term, right?
What is the definition of term "spouses"?

 

[rupol2000]

"Same-sex marriage" is a fraud in the US

1 U.S. Code § 7 - Marriage

www.law.cornell.edu

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
(Added Pub. L. 104–199, § 3(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419.)

/thread

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Apparently you can say any shit that no one is interested in, it's legal in the USA

It's called 'shit posting', comrade. Happens all the time.

 

[fncceo]

Dogs can’t consent.

Give my dog a milk bone and he will consent to literally anything.

 

[ABikerSailor]

"Same-sex marriage" is a fraud in the US

1 U.S. Code § 7 - Marriage

www.law.cornell.edu

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
(Added Pub. L. 104–199, § 3(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419.)

/thread

Nice bunch of cherry picking you did there dude, but that definition is currently outdated, as it was changed in 2015.

Marriage

www.law.cornell.edu

Marriage​

Primary tabs​

Marriage is the legal union of a couple as spouses. The basic elements of a marriage are: (1) the parties' legal ability to marry each other, (2) mutual consent of the parties, and (3) a marriage contract as required by law.
See also Common-Law Marriage.

We both used the same website as reference, and the current definition doesn't specify gender. Same sex couples are allowed to marry ever since getting rid of DOMA. From further down the page in the link I have in this post............

In 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which, for federal purposes, defined marriage as "only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" (1 U.S.C. § 7). DOMA further provided that "No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship" (28 U.S.C. § 1738C). (See Conflict of laws, Constitutional law). In the 2013 case United States v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court struck down DOMA as unconstitutional.

In 2015, the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges marked a historic change in marriage law across the United States by declaring that denying same-sex couples the freedom to marry violates the U.S. Constitution. This decision invalidated all state statutes and constitutional amendments barring same-sex marriages.

So, as you can see by the underlined portion, the Supreme Court changed marriage law allowing same sex couples to marry. Might wanna keep up with what is current, because using old information to "prove" your point only makes you look like an outdated idiot who cannot accept the fact that the USA is smart enough to change with the times.

 

[Roudy]

Muslims Tell You Why They Hate Dogs

An interesting article published by PJ Media entitled “Why do so many Muslims hate dogs” discusses how dogs are treated from Muslims' perspectives: All

www.usacollegex.com

We Hate Dogs This Much​

PJ Media reports that “Blind and others with poor vision who rely on guide dogs have been forced by Muslim bus drivers to get off their buses often to calm the hysterical reaction of other Muslim passengers. Much worse, killings of dogs, chiefly by poison, in areas populated mainly by Muslims has been reported in Spain, Sweden, France, and Great Britain.”
Please note that torturing and killing dogs is also quite common in many undeveloped countries. DanielPipes.org states “this is the real reason why Muslims are forbidden to have a dog as a pet or allow one in their house”
A puppy deterred the “Archangel Gabriel” from entering Muhammad’s house, thus,dogs are ordered to be killed.

(from Sahih Muslim, Book 024, Number 5246)

Sahih Muslim is a collection of hadith compiled by Imam Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Naysaburi (rahimahullah). His collection is considered to be one of the most authentic collections of the Sunnah of the Prophet.

 

[Roudy]

Excerpts from Islamic Doctrines - Kill the dogs :

From Bukhari Vol. 4, #540

Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar: Allah's Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed.

From Abu Dawud #2839

Abd Allah B. Mughaffal reported the apostle of Allah as saying: Were dogs not a species of creature I should command that they all be killed; but kill every pure black one.
The Hadith's note for #2839 says, "The prophet did not order the killing of all the dogs, for some are to be retained for hunting and watching. He ordered to kill the jet black ones. They might be more mischievous among them.

From Muslim #3814

Ibn Mughaffal reported: Allah's messenger ordered the killing of dogs and then said, "what is the trouble with them (the people of Medina? How dogs are nuisances to them (the citizens of Medina)? He then permitted keeping of dogs for hunting and (the protection of) herds. ...[and for] for the protection of cultivated land.

From Muslim #Number 055

Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e. about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.

From Muslim #3813

Abu Zubair heard Jabir Abdullah saying: Allah's messenger ordered us to kill dogs and we carried out this order so much so that we also killed the dog roaming with a women from the desert. Then Allah's apostle forbade their killing. He said: "It is your duty to kill the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes) for it is a devil.

The note for #3814 says,

"The Hadith gives us an idea why the prophet commanded to kill dogs. There must have been an excess of stray dogs and thus the danger of rabies in the city of Medina and its suburbs. The prophet therefore ordered to kill them. Later on when it was found that his Companions were killing them indiscriminately, he forbade them to do so and told them that only the ferocious beasts which were a source of danger to life should be killed. The word "Devil" in the Hadith clarifies this point. Here devil stands for ferocious.

 

[Roudy]

Folks - The Hatred of Dogs | NORSKK®

Another clash of civilizations: Islam's hatred for dogs based in scriptures and culture

norskk.com

 

[rupol2000]

the Supreme Court changed marriage law

The Court is not a legislative body, it has no authority to change the law

 

[rupol2000]

Excerpts from Islamic Doctrines - Kill the dogs :

From Bukhari Vol. 4, #540


From Abu Dawud #2839


From Muslim #3814


From Muslim #Number 055


From Muslim #3813


The note for #3814 says,

Your own quotes say that you are lying. It clearly follows from them that dogs were killed before Allah, and when Allah came, dog breeding was legalized

 

[WinterBorn]

The Court is not a legislative body, it has no authority to change the law

The Supreme Court can, in fact, change law. As a matter of fact, their most important duty is to determine whether a law is constitutional or not.

If a law is unconstitutional it is struck down.

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

Is it necessary to legalize marriages with dogs?​

How else do you expect Democrats to get married?

 

[WinterBorn]

Marriage is the legal union of a couple as spouses - This is legal definition of term, right?
What is the definition of term "spouses"?

You are still on this?

Didn't I already educate you on the US Constitution? Specifically the 14th amendment?

 

[WinterBorn]

I think this is a good idea, because sex between dogs and people happens more often than sex between same-sex people. If you are against the legalization of marriages with dogs, then argue this: how is marriage with a dog different from same-sex marriage.
If you support the legalization of dog marriages, do you consider it necessary to promote such marriages among schoolchildren?

You conveniently ignore the entire concept of consenting adults.

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

Marriage is the legal union of a couple as spouses - This is legal definition of term, right?
What is the definition of term "spouses"?

This is a VERY interesting book............I suggest you read it.

 

[rupol2000]

in fact,

The Supreme Court can, in fact, change law

What is the fucking "fact" are you talking about? Why they "can" it? Because of menstruation? Who gave them this right?

They didn't change the laws, they just made illegal decisions. They haven't changed the law.

 

[rupol2000]

Specifically the 14th amendment?

This already discursed. There are nothing about fags in 14th amendment