The definition of "unnatural" is not something with a "huge negative impact." Unkotare is correct. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to define illegal immigration as unnatural.Americans as a distinct group will be gone , over run in my opinion . You already see Americans being over run in [example] s. calfornia imo .
To be fair there are many Hispanics (the group here in the largest numbers illegally) who are also citizens of this country. We won't be overrun with illegal aliens but our demographics will certainly change. I object to this unnatural and unlawful change and so do most sane and loyal Americans.
"Unnatural"?
Seek help, headcase.
Please don't bother to reply to me if you can't be civil. There is nothing natural about illegal immigration nor is it lawful. It's a huge negative impact on our own citizens also. Get back with me when Mexico embraces an illegal invasion from China and therefore turns into an Asian country culturally rather than a Hispanic one in identity. Hypocrisy, anyone?
Illegal immigration over political boundaries is not a process of nature one way or the other. Illegal immigration is a problem, but your attempt to dramatize it further through the misuse of language is unnecessary and indulgent.
No dramatization or misuse of language on my part. Why don't you research the huge negative impact that illegal aliens have on our own citizens? Why so little respect for our immigration laws that you appear to defend illegal aliens but try to pretend you don't?
So it's just plain natural for most human beings to crash a nation's borders illegally? Really? I note that neither of you would touch the word unlawful of which it certainly is. What nation in the world would embrace the changing of their demographics in that manner?