I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!

I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!
Fire away!
heh heh. No pun intended.
Dear Mr. M14 Shooter:
How does one grow up in today's world with increasing threats to both our homes and liberties and NOT be pro gun?
Thank you for your time.
Great question!
Some people do not have the mental or emotional capacity to protect themselves; they want to force this inadequacy on others .
Some people want the state to have a monopoly on force and know this cannot happen while the people remain armed
Some people are hoplophobes and believe their fear of inanimate objects justifies reducing the rights of others
I am sure the are any number of other reasons - there are my big three.
 
[
We finally arrived at a sane, honest answer from a gun guy; only took 23 hours.
You know this is not true; you know my answer was completely same and completely honest.
You just didn't like it because it didn't fit your narrative.

Tell us: If someone is shooting at you, are you counting his rounds to see if he reloads at 10 or 20 or 30?
Can you even tell if he reloaded or simply paused?
And finally: If you plan to charge him during a reload, wouldn't you prefer to have a gun?

Of course you don't have answers - these are but a few of the particulars you didn't consider when you presented your false dichotomy.
No. You answered a question not asked.
I certainly did - it's not my fault you don't understand the breadth and depth of the issue you presented.
It was a question.
And I answered with absolutely sound reasoning and 100% honesty.
 
You know this is not true; you know my answer was completely same and completely honest.
You just didn't like it because it didn't fit your narrative.

Tell us: If someone is shooting at you, are you counting his rounds to see if he reloads at 10 or 20 or 30?
Can you even tell if he reloaded or simply paused?
And finally: If you plan to charge him during a reload, wouldn't you prefer to have a gun?

Of course you don't have answers - these are but a few of the particulars you didn't consider when you presented your false dichotomy.
You are a sicko who actually dreams of being shot at, so you can use your only source of confidence
I'll remind you this is the CDZ.
You may edit your post, after which I will not report you.
I will remind you that you can not remove bump stock purchases from your credit history......
Maybe he paid cash
Still illegal, not sure if the seller is required to keep records and or report these

No seller was ever required to keep records of bump stocks as they were not firearms.

The government does not know who owns them
 
Maybe he paid cash
Still illegal, not sure if the seller is required to keep records and or report these
Until they were made illegal, bump stocks were completely unregulated -- they freely changed hands and cannot be tracked as they have no serial number.
The manufacturer may know how many they made, but no one knows where they are or who has them.
 
You are a sicko who actually dreams of being shot at, so you can use your only source of confidence
I'll remind you this is the CDZ.
You may edit your post, after which I will not report you.
I will remind you that you can not remove bump stock purchases from your credit history......
Maybe he paid cash
Still illegal, not sure if the seller is required to keep records and or report these

No seller was ever required to keep records of bump stocks as they were not firearms.

The government does not know who owns them
The government has the name address and complete legal firearms history of everyone who ordered with credit, which is most

You are not being logical, I am actually trying to help you
 
I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!
Fire away!
heh heh. No pun intended.
Dear Mr. M14 Shooter:
How does one grow up in today's world with increasing threats to both our homes and liberties and NOT be pro gun?
Thank you for your time.
Great question!
Some people do not have the mental or emotional capacity to protect themselves; they want to force this inadequacy on others .
Some people want the state to have a monopoly on force and know this cannot happen while the people remain armed
Some people are hoplophobes and believe their fear of inanimate objects justifies reducing the rights of others
I am sure the are any number of other reasons - there are my big three.

I really like the assumption that people who carry never have been the victim of a violent crime and that they carry for no "real" reason.
These people think because they haven't been the victim of a crime that no one they ever meet has been either.

I was the victim of a violent crime. When I was 18 living and working in a shitty area of a shitty city I was jumped by 3 punk thugs. I was robbed of my cash ( rent money) my watch and they even took my winter coat. I was hit in the face by a kid who had a bicycle chain wrapped around his hand and kicked while on the ground resulting in 3 cracked ribs, a fractured eye orbital and a lacerated spleen. I still have the scar under my left eye.

There is real violence in the world and those that deny it are ignorant in their good fortune not to have experienced it.
 
Last edited:
You said you own from 1 to 5 bump stocks. Check the laws genius
You need to re-read my response.
After you do, I will accept your apology for calling me a criminal.
No you need to stop lying and pretending to be a bigshot..
Got that kid
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal

Face it as it is true
 
I'll remind you this is the CDZ.
You may edit your post, after which I will not report you.
I will remind you that you can not remove bump stock purchases from your credit history......
Maybe he paid cash
Still illegal, not sure if the seller is required to keep records and or report these

No seller was ever required to keep records of bump stocks as they were not firearms.

The government does not know who owns them
The government has the name address and complete legal firearms history of everyone who ordered with credit, which is most

You are not being logical, I am actually trying to help you
Bump stocks are not and have never been firearms.

And if i want your help I'll ask for it. But I don't see ever wanting your help
 
You said you own from 1 to 5 bump stocks. Check the laws genius
You need to re-read my response.
After you do, I will accept your apology for calling me a criminal.
No you need to stop lying and pretending to be a bigshot..
Got that kid
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
Other than you can't, I mean.
 
There is real violence in the world and those that deny it are ignorant in their good fortune not to have experienced it.
Today, they will tell you gun violence is so bad, we need to further limit the rights of the law abiding.
Later today, they will tell you there's no reason for you to own/carry a gun.
 
You said you own from 1 to 5 bump stocks. Check the laws genius
You need to re-read my response.
After you do, I will accept your apology for calling me a criminal.
No you need to stop lying and pretending to be a bigshot..
Got that kid
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
Other than you can't, I mean.
Why dont you know that you made it. Altzheimers perhaps, should a person who does not know what they say be carrying a gun

NOPE
 
You need to re-read my response.
After you do, I will accept your apology for calling me a criminal.
No you need to stop lying and pretending to be a bigshot..
Got that kid
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
Other than you can't, I mean.
Why dont you know that you made it. Altzheimers perhaps, should a person who does not know what they say be carrying a gun

NOPE
FYI he never said he owned any he said

"If I own.....I wouldn't tell you"

It was in this post

I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!

This is me helping you
 
You need to re-read my response.
After you do, I will accept your apology for calling me a criminal.
No you need to stop lying and pretending to be a bigshot..
Got that kid
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
Other than you can't, I mean.
Why dont you know that you made it.
This is a lie. You cannot cite any such statement by me, and you know it.
 
A gun is a tool, only as good or bad as the person using it. Why people demonize the tool and not the person is ridiculous. It is a very female characteristic that some men have adopted. Grow a pair guys!
 
No. You answered a question not asked.
I certainly did - it's not my fault you don't understand the breadth and depth of the issue you presented.

It was a question.

If you were being shot at, would you prefer they spend more time shooting or reloading?

Any thing else is being added by you in an attempt to sound less illogical.

If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting and less time reloading.
Assumption of facts not in evidence. Classic sidestep of the presented question.

What facts?
You’re being shot at.

You posed no facts you asked a question to illicit a response that was an opinion.

True. I was asking for an opinion.

My opinion is that If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting back and less time reloading

Again, assumption of facts not in evidence.

It’s okay though.

The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
 
I certainly did - it's not my fault you don't understand the breadth and depth of the issue you presented.

It was a question.

If you were being shot at, would you prefer they spend more time shooting or reloading?

Any thing else is being added by you in an attempt to sound less illogical.

If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting and less time reloading.
Assumption of facts not in evidence. Classic sidestep of the presented question.

What facts?
You’re being shot at.

You posed no facts you asked a question to illicit a response that was an opinion.

True. I was asking for an opinion.

My opinion is that If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting back and less time reloading

Again, assumption of facts not in evidence.

It’s okay though.

The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.

Excuse me you asked
IF you were being shot at

That is not a fact that is a question based on a hypothetical

And do you think a criminal who would shoot at you would obey the law and only use small capacity magazines?
 

Forum List

Back
Top