I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!

If you have 1 to 5 bump stocks as u said u r a criminal
Why don't you cite the post and quote the text where I said I had 1-5 bump stocks.
Other than you can't, I mean.
Why dont you know that you made it.
This is a lie. You cannot cite any such statement by me, and you know it.
Actually you are demonstrating altzheimers symptoms

How old are you, because children often behave in the same manner
Really...just stop. You’re an idiot and you confirm it more with every post
Been told similar stuff before, by better than you
 
It’s okay though.
The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
The fact you need to lie about this says all that need be said
Thanks.
My assessment is 100% truthful.
This is also a lie.
You are fully aware of the fact you offered a false dichotomy.

It was a question. Unfortunately hundreds of people are going To face this year. Nothing false about it
 
It’s okay though.
The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
The fact you need to lie about this says all that need be said
Thanks.
My assessment is 100% truthful. Which is why it bothers you so much
And why your buddy is spending all of his time parsing words instead of addressing the question
Its not my fault you offered a false dichotomy. You'll note I warned in the OP that I would call out logical fallacies.
 
FYI he never said he owned any he said

"If I own.....I wouldn't tell you"

It was in this post

I'm pro-gun - ask me anything!

This is me helping you
And I informed him that owning a bump stock makes a person a criminal and I then informed you that all of these bought on credit are in a database

He never said he owned any as you claim he did.

You really think there is a data base of everything you purchase on a credit card that is kept forever?
No I do not think this

Normal people by the way all know this
People know that the credit card company doesn't know every item you purchased it only knows where, when and how much the total charged processed was.

Do Credit Card Statements Show What You Bought?
Uh huh, and the government does not record phone calls and emails too

You believe as you choose

Does the term crazy as a shit house rat mean anything to you?
 
It’s okay though.
The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
The fact you need to lie about this says all that need be said
Thanks.
My assessment is 100% truthful. Which is why it bothers you so much
And why your buddy is spending all of his time parsing words instead of addressing the question
Its not my fault you offered a false dichotomy. You'll note I warned in the OP that I would call out logical fallacies.

That you can’t answer the question asked?

Whose fault is it?
 
It’s okay though.
The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
The fact you need to lie about this says all that need be said
Thanks.
My assessment is 100% truthful. Which is why it bothers you so much
And why your buddy is spending all of his time parsing words instead of addressing the question
Its not my fault you offered a false dichotomy. You'll note I warned in the OP that I would call out logical fallacies.
That you can’t answer the question asked?
Whose fault is it?
Its not my fault you offered a false dichotomy. You'll note I warned in the OP that I would call out logical fallacies.
 
Below is a list of states along with their populations, number of electoral votes, and a percentage that demonstrates the relative value of a vote cast in that state compared to the national average For example, in 2008, on average a state is awarded one electoral vote for every 565,166 people.

However, Wyoming has three electoral votes and only 532,668 citizens (as of 2008 estimates). As a result each of Wyoming's three electoral votes corresponds to 177,556 people. Understood in one way, these people have 3.18 times as much clout in the Electoral College as an average American, or 318% (as listed in the pdf chart, downloadable below).

Population vs. Electoral Votes - Fairvote
---------------------------------------

Maj. rule happens in the Federal and State House and Senate and the Supreme Court. Yet the maj vote does not count in the elections for Potus. WHY?

While there is evidence that the founders assumed the electors would be independent actors,
https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/electoral-college

There are 2 Senators from every state and they have their representatives in the house to bring their voices to the congress. We do not need the EC any more. The population of the US in 1800 was about 5 million and only 13 states, people were uneducated and the workers did not vote, or the women or blacks, only the rich white men aka the founders.

Most workers did not even know who was running when the EC was invented.

That is the wrong way of looking at it. Without the EC most states would get left behind. Once you understand the cocept of the sovereignty of each state you’ll understand that the EC is a system that affectively makes sure that all of them have representation in our presidential elections. It’s not about slave owners or any other nonsense you hear on MSNBC

look at all these big government socialists turning into limited government conservatives all of a sudden at the idea of making facebook stop censoring political opinions they dont like

I didn't think we could get any lower than we are in Hillary's eyes!

Now we are the dregs!


What an incredible scumbag.

So now law-abiding Americans are the "Dregs Of Society".

Well, that does it.....he's lost my vote.


He never had your vote to start with dumb ass..



That may well be true, but if Biden were to win, it would still be his responsibility to serve ALL Americans, not just those on the far left wing. For someone to encourage division, instead of bringing us together, isn't good for the country.


The president isn't obligated to represent the hateful racists. That's the biggest problem now. Trump thinks he should.

As president you should represent all Americans.


They never learn do they? Insulting half the country is a great way to get elected.
Worked for Trump!

President Trump only attacked back, when he was attacked first. Strictly a counter puncher.

John McCain called Trump's supporters "crazies", so he fought back for the people
Trump punches down and too often for a President.

He shows no redeemable qualities at all.

If he wants respect let him earn it by showing respect.

Too many simple minded people admire him for his boorish. I weep for the future if this population raises their children with Trump as a role model.

Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Which is better, M1A, AR-10 or FAL?

Better for what? :)
 
Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Note that if your question contains falsehoods and/or logical fallacies, that honest answer will make light of same.

Note also that a number of your are on ignore, so if you don't get a response, you'll know why.

Fire away!
Do you support the infringment of an individuals constitutional rights, for life, even after the completion of a court ordered sentence. And if so... Should we not also forbid their freedom of religious expression, disallow them from service as journalists, and subject them to search, and seizure, at any time, in any place, for any, or no reason at all?
 
Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Note that if your question contains falsehoods and/or logical fallacies, that honest answer will make light of same.

Note also that a number of your are on ignore, so if you don't get a response, you'll know why.

Fire away!
What the maximum effective range of a Mark-19?
 
Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Note that if your question contains falsehoods and/or logical fallacies, that honest answer will make light of same.

Note also that a number of your are on ignore, so if you don't get a response, you'll know why.

Fire away!
What the maximum effective range of a Mark-19?
The AGL?
A little less than a mile.
 
And I informed him that owning a bump stock makes a person a criminal and I then informed you that all of these bought on credit are in a database

He never said he owned any as you claim he did.

You really think there is a data base of everything you purchase on a credit card that is kept forever?
No I do not think this

Normal people by the way all know this
People know that the credit card company doesn't know every item you purchased it only knows where, when and how much the total charged processed was.

Do Credit Card Statements Show What You Bought?
Uh huh, and the government does not record phone calls and emails too

You believe as you choose

Does the term crazy as a shit house rat mean anything to you?
Yea it means u r humiliated like all before you.
 
Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Note that if your question contains falsehoods and/or logical fallacies, that honest answer will make light of same.

Note also that a number of your are on ignore, so if you don't get a response, you'll know why.

Fire away!
What the maximum effective range of a Mark-19?
1600 effective to 2400 max yards

Try google, its easy
 
Below is a list of states along with their populations, number of electoral votes, and a percentage that demonstrates the relative value of a vote cast in that state compared to the national average For example, in 2008, on average a state is awarded one electoral vote for every 565,166 people.

However, Wyoming has three electoral votes and only 532,668 citizens (as of 2008 estimates). As a result each of Wyoming's three electoral votes corresponds to 177,556 people. Understood in one way, these people have 3.18 times as much clout in the Electoral College as an average American, or 318% (as listed in the pdf chart, downloadable below).

Population vs. Electoral Votes - Fairvote
---------------------------------------

Maj. rule happens in the Federal and State House and Senate and the Supreme Court. Yet the maj vote does not count in the elections for Potus. WHY?

While there is evidence that the founders assumed the electors would be independent actors,
https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/electoral-college

There are 2 Senators from every state and they have their representatives in the house to bring their voices to the congress. We do not need the EC any more. The population of the US in 1800 was about 5 million and only 13 states, people were uneducated and the workers did not vote, or the women or blacks, only the rich white men aka the founders.

Most workers did not even know who was running when the EC was invented.

That is the wrong way of looking at it. Without the EC most states would get left behind. Once you understand the cocept of the sovereignty of each state you’ll understand that the EC is a system that affectively makes sure that all of them have representation in our presidential elections. It’s not about slave owners or any other nonsense you hear on MSNBC

look at all these big government socialists turning into limited government conservatives all of a sudden at the idea of making facebook stop censoring political opinions they dont like

What an incredible scumbag.

So now law-abiding Americans are the "Dregs Of Society".

Well, that does it.....he's lost my vote.

He never had your vote to start with dumb ass..


That may well be true, but if Biden were to win, it would still be his responsibility to serve ALL Americans, not just those on the far left wing. For someone to encourage division, instead of bringing us together, isn't good for the country.

The president isn't obligated to represent the hateful racists. That's the biggest problem now. Trump thinks he should.
As president you should represent all Americans.

They never learn do they? Insulting half the country is a great way to get elected.
Worked for Trump!

President Trump only attacked back, when he was attacked first. Strictly a counter puncher.

John McCain called Trump's supporters "crazies", so he fought back for the people
Trump punches down and too often for a President.

He shows no redeemable qualities at all.

If he wants respect let him earn it by showing respect.

Too many simple minded people admire him for his boorish. I weep for the future if this population raises their children with Trump as a role model.

Ask me anything, and you'll get an honest answer.

Which is better, M1A, AR-10 or FAL?

Better for what? :)


That is actually a good question.

I like my M1A because of the nostalgia of using a M-14 in the Army. 'Merica!

I like my AR-10 because it is a good scope platform.

I like my FAL because, well, just because.
 
That is actually a good question.
I like my M1A because of the nostalgia of using a M-14 in the Army. 'Merica!
I like my AR-10 because it is a good scope platform.
I like my FAL because, well, just because.
Until the advent if the AR10 platform, the M14 was the premier 7.62x51 battle rifle because of its simplicity and accuracy - the G3 and FAL both had flaws in that regard.
The AR10 is much easier to shoot well than the M14, if slightly more complex.
 
He never said he owned any as you claim he did.

You really think there is a data base of everything you purchase on a credit card that is kept forever?
No I do not think this

Normal people by the way all know this
People know that the credit card company doesn't know every item you purchased it only knows where, when and how much the total charged processed was.

Do Credit Card Statements Show What You Bought?
Uh huh, and the government does not record phone calls and emails too

You believe as you choose

Does the term crazy as a shit house rat mean anything to you?
Yea it means u r humiliated like all before you.

No that's not what it means at all.
 
That is actually a good question.
I like my M1A because of the nostalgia of using a M-14 in the Army. 'Merica!
I like my AR-10 because it is a good scope platform.
I like my FAL because, well, just because.
Until the advent if the AR10 platform, the M14 was the premier 7.62x51 battle rifle because of its simplicity and accuracy - the G3 and FAL both had flaws in that regard.
The AR10 is much easier to shoot well than the M14, if slightly more complex.


It has always been a debate on which is better, the M-14 or the FAL.

I am partial to the M-14 because I learned to use one in the Army in 1966. I love my M1A now.

I also have a FAL.

Both rifles haves their pros and cons. It is like what is better, a Blond or a Brunette girlfriend?

I like the ergonomics of the M1A better than that of the FAL but other people would differ with me.

The FAL is a better scope platform.

Over the years I have tried almost every scope solution for the M1A and none of them are very good. The scope sits highs and adds weight to an already heavy weapon. Once you put a scope on it then it is pretty much a bench rest shooter. Nowadays I don't have a scope on any of my M1As.

The only scope worth putting on a M-14 would be a Trijicon TA-01B. However, you need the Trijicon $600 scope mount for it to be low enough. That scope is light enough and low enough with the proper mount to maintain the MBR aspects of the M-14.
 
The FAL is a better scope platform.
Over the years I have tried almost every scope solution for the M1A and none of them are very good.
This is true - optic options for the M14 are limited - I have never used one on mine.


I tied scoping my M1As because of my aging eyesight. I just couldn't see anything with iron sights.

However, last year I got cataract surgery and it corrected a lot of my problems and nowadays I can use iron sights the same as when I was younger.

One of the first things I did was take the scopes off the M1As.
 
The FAL is a better scope platform.
Over the years I have tried almost every scope solution for the M1A and none of them are very good.
This is true - optic options for the M14 are limited - I have never used one on mine.
I tied scoping my M1As because of my aging eyesight. I just couldn't see anything with iron sights.
However, last year I got cataract surgery and it corrected a lot of my problems and nowadays I can use iron sights the same as when was younger.
One of the first things I did was take the scopes off the M1As.
I -DO- have a good mount for my M1 Garand - but it requires the removal of the rear sight drum.
 

Forum List

Back
Top