You’re being shot at.Assumption of facts not in evidence. Classic sidestep of the presented question.It was a question.
If you were being shot at, would you prefer they spend more time shooting or reloading?
Any thing else is being added by you in an attempt to sound less illogical.
If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting and less time reloading.
What facts?
You posed no facts you asked a question to illicit a response that was an opinion.
True. I was asking for an opinion.
My opinion is that If I were being shot at I would want to spend more time shooting back and less time reloading
Again, assumption of facts not in evidence.
It’s okay though.
The faux premise in the OP requested that he be asked anything. I did and he gave some ridiculous response to avoid the all too clearly absurd position he would have to take to endorse restrictions on the size of magazines.
Excuse me you asked
IF you were being shot at
That is not a fact that is a question based on a hypothetical
Oh brother.