I'm DONE Talking About The 2020 Election

[Road Runner]

No one but your Alice in Wonderland fantasies have proven anything. That's not good enough.

 

[BWK]

We'll, at least we know you can act silly, show us how weak you are, and argue nothing. Lol! A total failure in other words.

 

[Lastamender]

No one but your Alice in Wonderland fantasies have proven anything. That's not good enough.

They have not been to court. If they get there it will be proven the election had 0 integrity.

 

[BWK]

They have not been to court. If they get there it will be proven the election had 0 integrity.

There is nothing to go there for. 60 Republican judges found no evidence, because there was none shown.

 

[Lastamender]

There is nothing to go there for. 60 Republican judges found no evidence, because there was none shown.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[BWK]

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

You have to be autistic. I can't think of another explanation.

 

[playtime]

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

Here Is The Evidence​

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sources, False Information
Country: United Kingdom
World Press Freedom Rank: UK 35/180

Here Is The Evidence


try again.

 

[Lastamender]

Here Is The Evidence​

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Poor Sources, False Information
Country: United Kingdom
World Press Freedom Rank: UK 35/180

Here Is The Evidence


try again.

Shove that source checker straight up your ass. They mean nothing. They are based on opinion, not fact.

 

[playtime]

Shove that source checker straight up your ass. They mean nothing. They are based on opinion, not fact.

History

Founded on November 10, 2020, Here Is The Evidence is a website that allows individuals to upload alleged 2020 election voter fraud news and information. The website completely lacks transparency as there are no names associated with the website. The domain is registered in the United Kingdom. A description of the website reads “Due to the irregularity of this current 2020 Presidential Election, this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing anomalies and legal issues. Our desire is that more of the election process would be made transparent so there would be unquestionable confidence in our voting systems. This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.”

^^^not opinion^^^

Funded by / Ownership

Here is the Evidence completely lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. There does not appear to be a revenue source at this time.

^^^not opinion^^^

Failed Fact Checks

• None. Here is the Evidence does not publish original content. However, the sources posted have failed numerous fact checks.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt (11/26/2020)

^^^ not opinion ^^^

 

[Lastamender]

History

Founded on November 10, 2020, Here Is The Evidence is a website that allows individuals to upload alleged 2020 election voter fraud news and information. The website completely lacks transparency as there are no names associated with the website. The domain is registered in the United Kingdom. A description of the website reads “Due to the irregularity of this current 2020 Presidential Election, this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing anomalies and legal issues. Our desire is that more of the election process would be made transparent so there would be unquestionable confidence in our voting systems. This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.”

^^^not opinion^^^

Funded by / Ownership

Here is the Evidence completely lacks transparency and does not disclose ownership. There does not appear to be a revenue source at this time.

^^^not opinion^^^

Failed Fact Checks

• None. Here is the Evidence does not publish original content. However, the sources posted have failed numerous fact checks.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt (11/26/2020)

^^^ not opinion ^^^

It is an opinion to me. Try again.

 

[playtime]

It is an opinion to me. Try again.

lol ... your 'opinion' lacks reality.

 

[Lastamender]

lol ... your 'opinion' lacks reality.

So does your world view.

 

[BWK]

They have not been to court. If they get there it will be proven the election had 0 integrity.

After 60 failed lawsuits, it's going no where.

 

[Lastamender]

After 60 failed lawsuits, it's going no where.

These will be criminal charges, not lawsuits.

 

[playtime]

So does your world view.

my world view?

do tell ... what might that be, 'eh?

 

[playtime]

These will be criminal charges, not lawsuits.

oh there will be criminal charges, alright ... but not the way you think.

 

[Lastamender]

oh there will be criminal charges, alright ... but not the way you think.

After six years of nothing another six years of nothing is expected.

 

[BWK]

After six years of nothing another six years of nothing is expected.

Lot's of desperation in that post.

 

[Lastamender]

Lot's of desperation in that post.

Really? The NY prosecutors trying to hang Trump have resigned. Lots of desperation there. The case will not be pursued..

 

[BWK]

Really? The NY prosecutors trying to hang Trump have resigned. Lots of desperation there. The case will not be pursued..

In other news; What to know about accounting firm Mazars' move to back away from Trump - KESQ

Trumps accounting firm abandons Trump. Want to know why? Take a wild guess. NY prosecutors are going no where.

They'll be others.