Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
i believe Christ would NOT be against a government feeding the needy or helping the infirmed... no where, absolutely no where in the Bible does Christ speak AGAINST a government that did such.....a gvt that took care of the neediest, the sick, the elderly, etc.The Bible says that God the Father himself molded that little child, His little child while it resided in the womb. That's how he knows how many hairs are on our heads. He put them there.
God even gives it it's very own DNA. I think He put that child there for a purpose. There was something that child was suppose to do while it was here, and we bring that purpose to an abrupt halt when we abort the child.
Are you of the opinion that Christ would favor today's liberals' policies? With social welfare programs relying heavily on government-directed spending of citizens' money.
I welcome anyone to show me scripture where Christ spoke against such....
i believe Christ would NOT be against a government feeding the needy or helping the infirmed... no where, absolutely no where in the Bible does Christ speak AGAINST a government that did such.....a gvt that took care of the neediest, the sick, the elderly, etc.The Bible says that God the Father himself molded that little child, His little child while it resided in the womb. That's how he knows how many hairs are on our heads. He put them there.
God even gives it it's very own DNA. I think He put that child there for a purpose. There was something that child was suppose to do while it was here, and we bring that purpose to an abrupt halt when we abort the child.
Are you of the opinion that Christ would favor today's liberals' policies? With social welfare programs relying heavily on government-directed spending of citizens' money.
I welcome anyone to show me scripture where Christ spoke against such....
it's NOT stealing....that's an outright lie. Taxes in this country are not stealing, PERIOD....and if they were.... as you ''righties claim'' then Christ supported stealing when he told the pharisees to ''give unto caesar's, what is his'''.....i believe Christ would NOT be against a government feeding the needy or helping the infirmed... no where, absolutely no where in the Bible does Christ speak AGAINST a government that did such.....a gvt that took care of the neediest, the sick, the elderly, etc.Are you of the opinion that Christ would favor today's liberals' policies? With social welfare programs relying heavily on government-directed spending of citizens' money.
I welcome anyone to show me scripture where Christ spoke against such....
"Thou shalt not steal" Ex. 20:15
Its True"Impregnated by a Rapist,it is still wrong to ABORT".....Putting it very kindly Azrael,YOU ARE A FUCKING CRETIN,"THE BIBLE HAS MIXED FEELINGS".....!!!!!!!Putting it not so kindly,Azrael YOU ARE WORST THAN A CRETIN."EARLY HEWBREWS WHERE(YOU MEAN WERE)ALL ABOUT GETTING IT ON(YOU MEAN RAPING AND FUCKING)THEIR CLOSE RELATIVES(YOU MEAN DAUGHTERS)".....putting it unkindly......YOU ARE A C.So is RAPE,INCEST and dare I say it,unwanted pregnancy.WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS ON THAT THEN.theliq always asking the hard questions
Rape as Sin is the burden of the person who carried it out, it might effect the victims judgement but it is the rapist who was wrong.
If impregnated by a rapist it is still wrong to abort the child, it was not the childs fault for coming into this world, God must have wanted it and as mere humans we can't fully understand God.
If the people are willing, well medical science has created things to help stop unwanted pregnancy, it was there responsibility to use protection and obviously they failed to do so. So in that case it is still wrong. Of course if they weren't married that's a whole another Sin.
Incest is disgusting.
The Bible seems to have mixed feelings about incest as a good some of the early Hebrews where all about getting it on with their close relatives.
I live in a developed careing society,where we respect women,and it is a womans choice and decision what she does with HER body.........Now piss of back 3000 years to whence you came. I'm not impressed with this garbage....theliq
Please excuse my language but this Azael is just toooooo much,even for a patient soul like myself.
i believe Christ would NOT be against a government feeding the needy or helping the infirmed... no where, absolutely no where in the Bible does Christ speak AGAINST a government that did such.....a gvt that took care of the neediest, the sick, the elderly, etc.Are you of the opinion that Christ would favor today's liberals' policies? With social welfare programs relying heavily on government-directed spending of citizens' money.
I welcome anyone to show me scripture where Christ spoke against such....
My question to Irish Ram was just to ascertain whether he met the condition in my subject line, or if he was responding from a more conservative vantage point. Sometimes folks weigh in even when not the target audience. I wasn't familiar with Irish Ram's political leanings so I was checking.
The Irish Ram was the name of one of the paddle wheel boats my ancestor's owned.
Doubt Jesus would get involved with any government, especially to express his opinion. The last time it didn't turn out well for him.
Besides, I doubt Jesus would or could understand much about day-to-day life in this country in the 21st Century, much less fathom the murky waters of the American political system. Most Americans don't have the foggiest notion about it either.
Oh and by the way, not everyone in the U.S. believes Jesus Christ is the Savior or the son of God, making his opinion rather moot.
And here's another big News Flash - the founding fathers were not Christians, so it follows that this country was not founded on it's teachings or beliefs.
Christians have a really difficult time with that concept because they keep insisting that it was. Of course, finding out the truth would require reading something on the subject, which I'm sure would be out of the question.
EXCERPT OF DISCUSSION >>>
Yes, I've read the story of the plagues. I'm trying to remember where God warned that he was going to kill the Egyptians' firstborn. Now, every plague increased in intensity and he continuously demanded, "Let my people go." But were the Egyptians told of the sign of the Passover-how to avoid the slaughter? I'll have to go back and read. I feel an insult coming with this post. A "Christian" will call me an idiot or moron.<<<<<
Woooooo! Damn! Good one! Rightwinger is on his game tonight. Didn't even think of that one!
No he's not.
He didn't snuff out anything still in the womb.
And recall, he gave advanced warning of it's coming and a chance to avoid that outcome.
Right, he didn't snuff anything still in the womb. That made it a LOT easier (emotionally) on the mothers. Losing a toddler is much easier. (sarcasm) Apparently, you got something totally different from rightwinger's post, than I did.
Yes, I've read the story of the plagues. I'm trying to remember where God warned that he was going to kill the Egyptians' firstborn. Now, every plague increased in intensity and he continuously demanded, "Let my people go." But were the Egyptians told of the sign of the Passover-how to avoid the slaughter? I'll have to go back and read.
I feel an insult coming with this post. A "Christian" will call me an idiot or moron.
If you think Christ would approve of today's liberal policies ...
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
Why would you think abortion a liberal policy restricting government in the context of the right to privacy was a conservative tenet, Goldwater supported the right to privacy and abortion accordingly, until conservatives lost their way.
Are you of the opinion that Christ would favor today's liberals' policies? With social welfare programs relying heavily on government-directed spending of citizens' money.
Why would you think responsible governance a liberal policy? Its perfectly appropriate in a modern, First World, industrialized Nation for its citizens to contribute to the upkeep and needs of society whether it be road and bridge repair, the educating of the Nations children, or protecting the health and safety of the members of that society, its all the responsibility of a modern government, having nothing to do with partisan politics or ideology.
Jesus would certainly approve of that society caring for its most vulnerable citizens, as private/non-profit entities wouldnt be able to provide comprehensive, consistent care.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
In his day Jesus was as liberal, under the definitions of what one would be today, as anyone could be in those times.
Jesus was a radical.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
I do not think Christ would approve of most things humans do.
Cons and libs both.
Would he have supported invading Iraq?
Would he support the stuporbowl?
Would he support texting while driving?
Taxation is stealing when it's used by the politicians to by votes and glut themselves on the people's labor.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
The Bible says that God the Father himself molded that little child, His little child while it resided in the womb. That's how he knows how many hairs are on our heads. He put them there.
God even gives it it's very own DNA. I think He put that child there for a purpose. There was something that child was suppose to do while it was here, and we bring that purpose to an abrupt halt when we abort the child.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
I do not think Christ would approve of most things humans do.
Cons and libs both.
Would he have supported invading Iraq?
Would he support the stuporbowl?
Would he support texting while driving?
Would he even support the US Constitution?
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
The Bible says that God the Father himself molded that little child, His little child while it resided in the womb. That's how he knows how many hairs are on our heads. He put them there.
God even gives it it's very own DNA. I think He put that child there for a purpose. There was something that child was suppose to do while it was here, and we bring that purpose to an abrupt halt when we abort the child.
The Bible also says that God said he knew us BEFORE he put us in the womb. That means he also created your soul.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
The Bible says that God the Father himself molded that little child, His little child while it resided in the womb. That's how he knows how many hairs are on our heads. He put them there.
God even gives it it's very own DNA. I think He put that child there for a purpose. There was something that child was suppose to do while it was here, and we bring that purpose to an abrupt halt when we abort the child.
The Bible also says that God said he knew us BEFORE he put us in the womb. That means he also created your soul.
... do you think Christ would approve of abortions?
