Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What many are suggesting is that some kid named Roy signed the girls yearbook almost 40 years ago. Recently someone added the rest of the stuff to the yearbook.So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.
There has been plenty publish to create doubt that the signature is Moore's. That being said, an independent expert needs to examine the signature.And none of it being used to disprove the yearbook signatureBeing an assistant district attorney, I'm sure there are plenty of things he wrote by hand that is public record.Note that Moore is not releasing anything he wrote by hand from back then.There are plenty of accurate photocopies available. I'm sure plenty of experts have had ample opportunity to view it. If it were determined to be a fake, fox would have a dozen of those experts on 24/7.
What many are suggesting is that some kid named Roy signed the girls yearbook almost 40 years ago. Recently someone added the rest of the stuff to the yearbook.So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.
That is a possibility... let's get if verified.What many are suggesting is that some kid named Roy signed the girls yearbook almost 40 years ago. Recently someone added the rest of the stuff to the yearbook.So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.
That was after the suggestion that the restaurant was spelled wrong was debunked, despite Mrs Moore putting fake pictures on FaceBook.
The suggestions just keep coming after the previous one was shot down. Has the possibility that it is his signature even crossed your mind?
From a bit of reading I've done, forensic handwriting analysis is another example of a technique that is not necessarily that accurate. Here's an example: How Handwriting Analysis Works
It is supposed to be harder to do when comparing to writing from a long time ago.
No fhere hasn’t been anything published. Are you talking about blogs saying the 7’s are slightly different? That kind of complete bullshit?There has been plenty publish to create doubt that the signature is Moore's. That being said, an independent expert needs to examine the signature.And none of it being used to disprove the yearbook signatureBeing an assistant district attorney, I'm sure there are plenty of things he wrote by hand that is public record.Note that Moore is not releasing anything he wrote by hand from back then.There are plenty of accurate photocopies available. I'm sure plenty of experts have had ample opportunity to view it. If it were determined to be a fake, fox would have a dozen of those experts on 24/7.
It's possible that Roy Moore did sign his first name and someone added the rest. That would explain the different colors of ink that some of the pictures seem to show. Of course those pictures may have been altered to make the colors look different when they really are not.What many are suggesting is that some kid named Roy signed the girls yearbook almost 40 years ago. Recently someone added the rest of the stuff to the yearbook.So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.
Even the "Roy" part looks accurate
Why do you think the 7s looking different is bullshit? They are very different.No fhere hasn’t been anything published. Are you talking about blogs saying the 7’s are slightly different? That kind of complete bullshit?There has been plenty publish to create doubt that the signature is Moore's. That being said, an independent expert needs to examine the signature.And none of it being used to disprove the yearbook signatureBeing an assistant district attorney, I'm sure there are plenty of things he wrote by hand that is public record.Note that Moore is not releasing anything he wrote by hand from back then.There are plenty of accurate photocopies available. I'm sure plenty of experts have had ample opportunity to view it. If it were determined to be a fake, fox would have a dozen of those experts on 24/7.
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?
If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
see that contaminates all the accusations. she was number two with an accusation. if one is false and there is no evidence, then all are false. oops!!!!So Moore is down to what? 13 accusers?
OmfgWhy do you think the 7s looking different is bullshit? They are very different.No fhere hasn’t been anything published. Are you talking about blogs saying the 7’s are slightly different? That kind of complete bullshit?There has been plenty publish to create doubt that the signature is Moore's. That being said, an independent expert needs to examine the signature.And none of it being used to disprove the yearbook signatureBeing an assistant district attorney, I'm sure there are plenty of things he wrote by hand that is public record.Note that Moore is not releasing anything he wrote by hand from back then.
One would think with a signature that is so important the lawyer would have her own expert verify the signature before going public with it.How many threads bringing up this same stupid crap are there going to be. Of course Aldred does not know 100% for sure Moore signed it, she was not there 40 years ago. But she does trust her client which is why she presented the yearbook. Out of all the attempts to discredit the yearbook, this is by far the most lame and stupid.
The Moore defenders are getting desperate.
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?
If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
There is enough evidence to put the matter before a civil grand jury. Moore v. all of his accusers, all under oath and in jeopardy of committing a felony.
One would think with a signature that is so important the lawyer would have her own expert verify the signature before going public with it.How many threads bringing up this same stupid crap are there going to be. Of course Aldred does not know 100% for sure Moore signed it, she was not there 40 years ago. But she does trust her client which is why she presented the yearbook. Out of all the attempts to discredit the yearbook, this is by far the most lame and stupid.
The Moore defenders are getting desperate.
It is not really that important, she is just one of multiple accusers.
well, it sort of is. it was the only supposed evidence. She now has created speculation on it all as tainted.One would think with a signature that is so important the lawyer would have her own expert verify the signature before going public with it.How many threads bringing up this same stupid crap are there going to be. Of course Aldred does not know 100% for sure Moore signed it, she was not there 40 years ago. But she does trust her client which is why she presented the yearbook. Out of all the attempts to discredit the yearbook, this is by far the most lame and stupid.
The Moore defenders are getting desperate.
It is not really that important, she is just one of multiple accusers.
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?
If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
There is enough evidence to put the matter before a civil grand jury. Moore v. all of his accusers, all under oath and in jeopardy of committing a felony.
again it falsifies here entire interview. now she is a liar. And now how many others did the exact same thing. Again, these women did not come out on their own. they were conjured up by a WAPA reporter. I call that convenient.WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?
If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
There is enough evidence to put the matter before a civil grand jury. Moore v. all of his accusers, all under oath and in jeopardy of committing a felony.
Do you think everyone who has questions about published reports should bring suit? Talk about jamming up the courts.
We could answer all the questions by simply producing the original signature for independent forensic examination and get this whole thing settled within days.
Why the fear if her testimony before the cameras are true?
Strange if you ask me.
Allreds goal is to keep Moore out of the senate. If Moore doesn't win the senate seat, all this will go away.So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.
