If repubs can never come up with specific policy examples of their party helping the...

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Hope and Change" is in it's 6th year and the radical left calls for Obama to state specific examples of how his party is supporting the middle class and the poor......Just kidding. You gotta laugh that the low information left wing jerks are doing what they always do ....acting like losers.

As I said Obama is responsible for the biggest tax cut for the middle class since Reagan. He also pushed to raise the minimum wage.

Any specifics on his awesome tax cut?

 

[Billy000]

Yeah we

Ye

You re

And

...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

Thanks for the hilarious link. She cracks me up!

And yet you can't explain why she is wrong.

Sure I can, if I can stop laughing long enough.
How many errors should I point out?

As many as you can handle. Quit stalling.

Here's the best one:

Reductions in the tax rate actually hurts the economy. That's because every dollar in lost tax revenue only creates 59 cents in economic growth.

Creating growth of 59 cents while saving taxpayers $1 hurts the economy? ROFLMAO!!!
Of course for a socialist, more freedom, less money in the hands of the government and more money in the hands of the people is a bad think. So I can understand why she is against it.

You realize of course that every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar we are in debt right?

You realize we should cut government spending, to eliminate that debt, right?

I do actually. However we also must increase revenue. Right now we are at 16% of the GDP. That is near the historic low.

You want to increase revenues? Eliminate idiotic regulations and the useless government agencies that write them. Start with Obamacare. Eliminate the Department of Energy. Eliminate the Department of Education.
Get rid of 85% of the EPA. Cut the corporate tax rate to 20% and eliminate stupid corporate welfare and green energy giveaways.
Revenues would sky rocket!

You are arbitrarily throwing out numbers. You have no idea what the cost/benefit analysis of that would be.

I could find the money we'd save. And you'd whine about it.

'
Yeah we'd have more money. We'd also have a crippled government.

 

[Oldstyle]

The only jobs Obama created were government jobs paid for by confiscated taxpayer funds. Now we have double the useless government drones than we had during the Bush administration. The median income for a typical middle class family dropped 7% since Obama took office.

No 2 million private jobs were created. The proof is in the links. Try reading them.

I suggest you go back and read your "link" again, Billy...those jobs were projected in the third quarter of 2011 and the amount projected by the CBO ranged from over 2 million to approximately eight hundred thousand. Most of those jobs were government positions that were subsequently lost when local and State governments ran out of stimulus monies.

The PROOF that the Obama Stimulus was a failure was provided by the Obama Administration themselves. You don't invent a new economic statistic..."jobs created or saved" if you actually created a lot of jobs...you do that if you've FAILED in that endeavor.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama and

...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut.

Are you saying Americans got to keep millions more of their own earnings AND jobs were created?

That's awesome!!! Let's do that some more!!!

Umm those millions saved were primarily the rich's money. Also, those cuts greatly contributed to our national debt.

No..Too much discretionary spending and an unwillingness to curb increases in non-discretionary spending caused the increases in debt and deficit.

US Debt by President

Read it. Bush's tax cuts have greatly increased the national debt.

Yes, Bush was a big spender. Obama is worse.

Obama and Bush have spent at the same rate.

Spent at the same rate? What does that even mean? Show me proof.

 

[Oldstyle]

Which is exactly the reason why Barry couldn't get Democrats to vote for his "second" stimulus.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I could find the money we'd save. And you'd whine about it.

Yeah we'd have more money. We'd also have a crippled government.

Crippling the wasteful parts of the government that harm our economy is a good thing.

 

[Billy000]

I have

Obama and

...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut.

Are you saying Americans got to keep millions more of their own earnings AND jobs were created?

That's awesome!!! Let's do that some more!!!

Umm those millions saved were primarily the rich's money. Also, those cuts greatly contributed to our national debt.

No..Too much discretionary spending and an unwillingness to curb increases in non-discretionary spending caused the increases in debt and deficit.

US Debt by President

Read it. Bush's tax cuts have greatly increased the national debt.

Yes, Bush was a big spender. Obama is worse.

Obama and Bush have spent at the same rate.

Spent at the same rate? What does that even mean? Show me proof.

I have to say it's a little obnoxious you haven't provided any sources of your own yet demand so many from me.

There was no spending growth under Obama. He was spending just as much as bush was when he left office.


o

 

[Billy000]

The only jobs Obama created were government jobs paid for by confiscated taxpayer funds. Now we have double the useless government drones than we had during the Bush administration. The median income for a typical middle class family dropped 7% since Obama took office.

No 2 million private jobs were created. The proof is in the links. Try reading them.

I suggest you go back and read your "link" again, Billy...those jobs were projected in the third quarter of 2011 and the amount projected by the CBO ranged from over 2 million to approximately eight hundred thousand. Most of those jobs were government positions that were subsequently lost when local and State governments ran out of stimulus monies.

The PROOF that the Obama Stimulus was a failure was provided by the Obama Administration themselves. You don't invent a new economic statistic..."jobs created or saved" if you actually created a lot of jobs...you do that if you've FAILED in that endeavor.

No those are all private. What it gave was an estimated range. 2.9 million was the highest estimate. The median of that is 2 million.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I have

Obama and

...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut.

Are you saying Americans got to keep millions more of their own earnings AND jobs were created?

That's awesome!!! Let's do that some more!!!

Umm those millions saved were primarily the rich's money. Also, those cuts greatly contributed to our national debt.

No..Too much discretionary spending and an unwillingness to curb increases in non-discretionary spending caused the increases in debt and deficit.

US Debt by President

Read it. Bush's tax cuts have greatly increased the national debt.

Yes, Bush was a big spender. Obama is worse.

Obama and Bush have spent at the same rate.

Spent at the same rate? What does that even mean? Show me proof.

I have to say it's a little obnoxious you haven't provided any sources of your own yet demand so many from me.

There was no spending growth under Obama. He was spending just as much as bush was when he left office.


o

yet demand so many from me.

You make silly claims with no proof. Of course I'll demand a source.

There was no spending growth under Obama.

STFU! Hilarious!

 

[Billy000]

I have

Obama and

...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut.

Are you saying Americans got to keep millions more of their own earnings AND jobs were created?

That's awesome!!! Let's do that some more!!!

Umm those millions saved were primarily the rich's money. Also, those cuts greatly contributed to our national debt.

No..Too much discretionary spending and an unwillingness to curb increases in non-discretionary spending caused the increases in debt and deficit.

US Debt by President

Read it. Bush's tax cuts have greatly increased the national debt.

Yes, Bush was a big spender. Obama is worse.

Obama and Bush have spent at the same rate.

Spent at the same rate? What does that even mean? Show me proof.

I have to say it's a little obnoxious you haven't provided any sources of your own yet demand so many from me.

There was no spending growth under Obama. He was spending just as much as bush was when he left office.


o

yet demand so many from me.

You make silly claims with no proof. Of course I'll demand a source.

There was no spending growth under Obama.

STFU! Hilarious!

Are you done yet?

 

[francoHFW]

If you don't count UE and welfare for victims of the corrupt Booosh World Depression (still about 400 billion/year), spending has gone down under Obama.

Why would Dems vote for an unpopular stimulus (at least they would leave themselves open for tidal waves of Pubcrappe) when Pubs were going to block it? Dems are just well meaning pussies, but at least they're not bought off lying a-holes screwing and leading astray the ignorant, loudmouth hater dupes...

Without TOTAL Pub obstruction and phony crises, we could have been out of this economic mess 3 years ago...

 

[Billy000]

If you don't count UE and welfare for victims of the corrupt Booosh World Depression (still about 400 billion/year), spending has gone down under Obama.

Why would Dems vote for an unpopular stimulus (at least they would leave themselves open for tidal waves of Pubcrappe) when Pubs were going to block it? Dems are just well meaning pussies, but at least they're not bought off lying a-holes screwing and leading astray the ignorant, loudmouth hater dupes...

Without TOTAL Pub obstruction and phony crises, we could have been out of this economic mess 3 years ago...

They will never understand it.

 

[whitehall]

"Hope and Change" is in it's 6th year and the radical left calls for Obama to state specific examples of how his party is supporting the middle class and the poor......Just kidding. You gotta laugh that the low information left wing jerks are doing what they always do ....acting like losers.

As I said Obama is responsible for the biggest tax cut for the middle class since Reagan. He also pushed to raise the minimum wage.

Barry extended the Bush tax cuts and then his energy policies hurt the middle class when they had to deal with an ironic frigid winter while the administration cited global warming to raise the price of energy. The middle class is the demographic most influenced by draconian energy policies. When the president (backed by the democrat party) claims with absolutely no scientific data that he will "wean Americans off fossil fuel" it means the middle class will suffer the most. Hussein's energy policy turns the middle class into the lower class at the stroke of a pen and that's what the president intended.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

If you don't count UE and welfare for victims of the corrupt Booosh World Depression (still about 400 billion/year), spending has gone down under Obama.

Why would Dems vote for an unpopular stimulus (at least they would leave themselves open for tidal waves of Pubcrappe) when Pubs were going to block it? Dems are just well meaning pussies, but at least they're not bought off lying a-holes screwing and leading astray the ignorant, loudmouth hater dupes...

Without TOTAL Pub obstruction and phony crises, we could have been out of this economic mess 3 years ago...

They will never understand it.

You two idiots couldn't balance a checkbook. If you just ignored all of the spending we would have a surplus! Yay obie! Just don't count the expenses! We have an absolute shitload of money!

How do you two morons think getting a nation up and going is possible when you ignore the UE expenses on the books while your policies are increasing the UE levels? Ignoring your debt's doesn't make them go away.

How does 1-4=1 to you two? You just ignore the minus portion of course. It's like it never happened.

 

[Billy000]

As usual the USMB rightwing response is completely devoid of relevance and substance.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

As usual the USMB rightwing response is completely devoid of relevance and substance.

It's math you moron. You can't just ignore expenses and claim you have a surplus. That is both relevance and substance as well as mathematical theory and reality.

 

[Billy000]

As usual the USMB rightwing response is completely devoid of relevance and substance.

It's math you moron. You can't just ignore expenses and claim you have a surplus. That is both relevance and substance as well as mathematical theory and reality.

I never claimed we had a surplus. Try and keep up.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

As usual the USMB rightwing response is completely devoid of relevance and substance.

It's math you moron. You can't just ignore expenses and claim you have a surplus. That is both relevance and substance as well as mathematical theory and reality.

I never claimed we had a surplus. Try and keep up.

You said exactly that when you replied to the village idiot's post. If only us simpletons could understand not counting UE as an expense would cut down what we actually owe. You replied, you're both morons.

 

[francoHFW]

At least you'll always have stupid insults, hater dupe. LOL. Thanks for wrecking the nonrich and the country, 9/11, the stupidest wars ever, a world depression, 5 years of mindless bs, and not even knowing it. Brainwashed functional moron.

 

[Billy000]

As usual the USMB rightwing response is completely devoid of relevance and substance.

It's math you moron. You can't just ignore expenses and claim you have a surplus. That is both relevance and substance as well as mathematical theory and reality.

I never claimed we had a surplus. Try and keep up.

You said exactly that when you replied to the village idiot's post. If only us simpletons could understand not counting UE as an expense would cut down what we actually owe. You replied, you're both morons.

Huh?