If a woman aborted my child, I would probably go ape shit. Why are the feelings of the father...

[Gracie]

Should it be illegal for a mother to jump from a ladder on to her pregnant belly, causing a miscarriage?

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The law (Constitution) doesn't look at it or care if it is an unwanted child or not. The Constitution says that "all persons" are equally entitled to the protections of our laws - be they planned or wanted persons or not.

Except the one person yoked with the sole burden, right?

Mom gets NO rights?

Mom becomes a slave?

 

[Chuz Life]

Should it be illegal for a mother to jump from a ladder on to her pregnant belly, causing a miscarriage?

Do you support our fetal homicide laws?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

Yes. Shit or get off the pot. This is a serious decision, but time is of the essence.

 

[Gracie]

Put it this way..nowadays, there is the morning after pill or whatever its called. Get raped, ya go get what was done removed in case it results in pregnancy. If she OR he didn't use protection and she is told after missing a period that she is preggers and she does not want to carry it, she goes and has it removed pronto. If she doesn't, and she is VERY preggers..then she waited to long. So sad, too bad. Carry it. Then give it up for adoption.

 

[Chuz Life]

The law (Constitution) doesn't look at it or care if it is an unwanted child or not. The Constitution says that "all persons" are equally entitled to the protections of our laws - be they planned or wanted persons or not.

Except the one person yoked with the sole burden, right?

Mom gets NO rights?

Mom becomes a slave?

To the extent that a woman's rights can be argued as being compromised during pregnancy. . . . unless she was raped, she compromised her rights her own damn self.

 

[Gracie]

Should it be illegal for a mother to jump from a ladder on to her pregnant belly, causing a miscarriage?

Do you support our fetal homicide laws?

What the FUCK does that have to do with the questions posed to you?? Nothing, that's what.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Do you support our fetal homicide laws?

Do I support laws prohibiting a mother's decision to abort? Not sure what laws you are referencing.

 

[Gracie]

unless she was raped, she compromised her rights her own damn self.

Immaculate conception, huh? Wow. A miracle!!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

To the extent that a woman's rights can be argued as being compromised during pregnancy. . . . unless she was raped, she compromised her rights her own damn self.

So, the next logical step in government overreach is outlawing sex, or licencing the practice thereof, right?

 

[Chuz Life]

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

Yes. Shit or get off the pot. This is a serious decision, but time is of the essence.

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... the more that bothers YOU.

Right?


So, it's not really about the child, the fact that it is a child, etc.

It's about YOU and how much you can stomach as you deny that child their rights.

You place the onus or burden on the child itself.... to overcome YOUR ability to deny them their rights, before you will finally, reluctantly accept that they have any rights.

To you and your sick pathetic ilk.... a child is not even a child, until they live too long and look too much LIKE a child for you to stomach the denials any more.

That's some pretty fucked up logic right there.

 

[Gracie]

How about the guy that was partner in making this fetus, is ordered by the government to have his dick removed? Maybe after 9 months, if it is still feasible to replace it once removed from the freezer in which it was stored, it can be re attached? Would that be ok? The government dictating what is to be done with HIS body? DIckless, for 9 months. Oh, and balls removed. Dick can be re attached but balls? Nope. Gone forever. Just like the mothers body since she is forced to carry.

Howzat?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... ythe more that bothers YOU.

Right?

Nope.

 

[Chuz Life]

To the extent that a woman's rights can be argued as being compromised during pregnancy. . . . unless she was raped, she compromised her rights her own damn self.

So, the next logical step in government overreach is outlawing sex, or licencing the practice thereof, right?

or, just simply hold people more accountable for the children's lives they actually create / begin. . . what's wrong with just doing that?

 

[Gracie]

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

Yes. Shit or get off the pot. This is a serious decision, but time is of the essence.

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... ythe more that bothers YOU.

Right?


So, it's not really about the child, the fact that it is a child, etc.

It's about YOU and how much you can stomach as you deny that child their rights.

You place the onus or burden on the child itself.... to overcome YOUR ability to deny them their rights, before you will finally, reluctantly accept that they have any rights.

To you and your sick pathetic ilk.... a child is not even a child, until they live too long and look too much LIKE a child for you to stomach the denials any more.

That's some pretty fucked up logic right there.

Again...the same question you keep conveniently not seeing:

How many unwanted by the mother children are you supporting with your paycheck, taking to school, paying the doc bills, clothing, feeding?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

or, just simply hold people more accountable for the children's lives they actually create / begin. . . what's wrong with just doing that?

When has government EVER stopped at that point. NOBODY is responsible. Humans are a bunch of irresponsible, pooh-flinging apes. Government must keep them from fucking or we will all be fucked. It's the same shit every motherfucking time.

 

[Chuz Life]

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... ythe more that bothers YOU.

Right?

Nope.

Bull shit.

 

[Chuz Life]

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

Yes. Shit or get off the pot. This is a serious decision, but time is of the essence.

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... ythe more that bothers YOU.

Right?


So, it's not really about the child, the fact that it is a child, etc.

It's about YOU and how much you can stomach as you deny that child their rights.

You place the onus or burden on the child itself.... to overcome YOUR ability to deny them their rights, before you will finally, reluctantly accept that they have any rights.

To you and your sick pathetic ilk.... a child is not even a child, until they live too long and look too much LIKE a child for you to stomach the denials any more.

That's some pretty fucked up logic right there.

Again...the same question you keep conveniently not seeing:

How many unwanted by the mother children are you supporting with your paycheck, taking to school, paying the doc bills, clothing, feeding?

All of em.

Prove that I don't.

 

[Gracie]

To the extent that a woman's rights can be argued as being compromised during pregnancy. . . . unless she was raped, she compromised her rights her own damn self.

So, the next logical step in government overreach is outlawing sex, or licencing the practice thereof, right?

or, just simply hold people more accountable for the children's lives they actually create / begin. . . what's wrong with just doing that?

Oh, you mean like the MAN too? Unless it is still a miracle pregnancy. Takes two to tango. And many men want to tango even though the woman doesn't want to. Which is another question you seem to avoid answering.

 

[Gracie]

If she is 5 or more months preggers..yeah. She should've had it removed as soon as she was told "yep. Yer preggers".

Yes. Shit or get off the pot. This is a serious decision, but time is of the essence.

Because..... the more it "looks" like the child it is.... ythe more that bothers YOU.

Right?


So, it's not really about the child, the fact that it is a child, etc.

It's about YOU and how much you can stomach as you deny that child their rights.

You place the onus or burden on the child itself.... to overcome YOUR ability to deny them their rights, before you will finally, reluctantly accept that they have any rights.

To you and your sick pathetic ilk.... a child is not even a child, until they live too long and look too much LIKE a child for you to stomach the denials any more.

That's some pretty fucked up logic right there.

Again...the same question you keep conveniently not seeing:

How many unwanted by the mother children are you supporting with your paycheck, taking to school, paying the doc bills, clothing, feeding?

All of em.

Prove that I don't.

Wow. You have a house full, dontcha?

Prove that you do, slick. And don't say taxes. I'm talking about every woman that wants to abort, YOU tell YOU will raise it in YOUR home with YOUR money.