Zone1 I would like to suggest a maximum of 3 new threads per day by any one poster

[Disir]

I agree. They absolutely do have other motives. Like Zone 1 and everyone start obvious political threads in the religion forum or some........interesting threads in the CDC.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

The powers that be want us to be divided and we need to stop buying into it.

So you think Democrats and Republicans are secretly AGREEING and CONSPIRING to DIVIDE people and NOT trying to get you to see the wisdom of THEIR political positions?

There is VAST difference between the two on the Abortion issue. Which side doesn't really believe what they're saying on the issue?

 

[the other mike]

Some people don't deserve my time. They have other motives

It's okay to be a wise old owl and ignore them but I like to play the fox and have fun with 'them' sometimes. ( whoever them is)

 

[the other mike]

So you think Democrats and Republicans are secretly AGREEING and CONSPIRING to DIVIDE people and NOT trying to get you to see the wisdom of THEIR political positions?

There is VAST difference between the two on the Abortion issue. Which side doesn't really believe what they're saying on the issue?

In Washington DC they most certainly are.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

It's okay to be a wise old owl and ignore them but I like to play the fox and have fun with 'them' sometimes. ( whoever them is)

That's YOUR choice. Glad you have lots of free time on your hands

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

In Washington DC they most certainly are.

Simplistic thinking.

 

[the other mike]

Simplistic thinking.

Stating the obvious.

 

[Indeependent]

3 threads per board a day seems like it might be reasonable but otherwise I'd say we have enough rules and limitations as it is.

Too bad one of those rules isn't being allowed to lie.

 

[Lisa558]

There are a handful that post incessantly. Do you open them, or is it selective to a certain username?

Yeah, there are a couple that really annoy me.

 

[the other mike]

That's YOUR choice. Glad you have lots of free time on your hands

My 5 or 10 minutes a day here is always enjoyable. However you experience it is your choice, not anyone else's.

 

[the other mike]

Too bad one of those rules isn't being allowed to lie.

You're barking up the wrong tree here pal .....I'm a 911 'truther' remember ?

 

[okfine]

Yeah, there are a couple that really annoy me.

The BLM freak that can't spell. I don't bother and just pass those up.

Basco is another incessant one. I pass on most of those.

The users that post against the clean start rule and get away with it is the bigger issue.

 

[Indeependent]

You're barking up the wrong tree here pal .....I'm a 911 'truther' remember ?

I love it when people say GW and Cheney didn't know 911 was gonna happen.

 

[the other mike]

I love it when people say GW and Cheney didn't know 911 was gonna happen.

A lot of people knew it was going to happen and a lot of people are still covering it up.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

.....but I'm starting to get old Lisa.

Without the constant reminders that I am hated because of my race, how else could I possibly remember?

 

[Lisa558]

.....but I'm starting to get old Lisa.

Without the constant reminders that I am hated because of my race, how else could I possibly remember?

What do you mean “get me”? Not without dinner first!

 

[BackAgain]

I believe the headline is self-explanatory.

Your headline is clear. My question is why?

I mean, on most days I start no new threads. I have occasionally started some threads. (Rarely more than one or two at most on any day.) But if I started 3 someday, why should it be that I am required to wait for another day to start a fourth thread?

As I see it, I don’t read threads I have no interest in, anyway. I’m confident others do the same thing. So why is another board rule needed?

 

[BackAgain]

.....but I'm starting to get old Lisa.

Without the constant reminders that I am hated because of my race, how else could I possibly remember?

 

[1srelluc]

What do you mean “get me”? Not without dinner first!

Your terms are acceptable.

 

[Lisa558]

Your terms are acceptable.

Actually, I was talking to the other guy, but if you spring for dinner, then you’re good too!

(Not really. I actually have pretty strict morals.)