How far back are we going to go to disqualify people from public office for sexual harrassment?

No one will destroy his life on the word of some cheap girl who lead him on and then changed her mind. Not a fine young man like him.
And thank God for that...
"some cheap girl who led him on....." And once again, it's always the woman's fault.

Worse, the woman is always “lying”, or “misremembering”, or she’s “crazy”, or she’s got an agenda. Women are always treated as inferior in these accusations.

But generally speaking it’s because they’re speaking out against privileged or powerful men. This case is one of a privileged young man who was groomed from the earliest age for the role he is trying to assume.

And that’s troubling in and of itself. A foot soldier in the extreme conservative cause groomed for the Supreme Court.

Whose nomination is proceeding t
With unprecedented haste, while obscuring much of the judge’s public record.

His history on the Starr Investigation is troubling, his tactics appalling, and it’s karma, IMO, that the tactic he introduced against President Clinton, is coming back to bite him in the ass.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Lie detectors?

Really?

You believe that malarkey?

Lie Detectors Don’t Work as Advertised and They Never Did | Smart News | Smithsonian

uh-huh. someone with PTSD couldn't beat a lie detector & make the outcome to her benefit.
 
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?
Ford won't even testify, as I predicted

This is payback for Garland, and it has hurt Democrat chances to win the House

This woman's actions actually hurts real victims

Another issue is that these suburan women that dems are hoping to influence have husbands, sons, fathers and brothers - this thing is already blowing up in their face, the lugenpresse is doing all they can to help, but this circus is helping republicans with purple voters in districts that matter

feinstein honored a confidentiality. something your president knows nothing about. we'll wait n' see about all those suburban women... & college aged women... & those who have wives & sisters & daughters.... not many women have gone thru life without something similair happening to them.

tick tock.
But she did not

Honor the confidentiality

She broke it when it became obvious that there was no other way to delay

This helps us with independent women

not true. nice try though.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Who are the witnesses you refer to? Seems like that would make it an open and shut case.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Because for two days they've screeched "but she passed a polygraph!!!!"....Kavanaugh passes one and oops

lol... you're an idiot. i see you finally got rid of that flag draped cross you hypocrite.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

Kavanaugh doesn't have to anything, it is Blasey who has to PROVE that she was assaulted.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
No no no, she has a lie detector test saying that the reported statement is correct, as in, in line with the letter to fienstien. With lie detector tests, they’ll ask the same question in a few different ways, as well as the control questions. The question posed is a sneaky little lawyer trick. I think it’s telling that that was the only question offered to the public, or if that was the only question operator asked her on the subject.

And she has one person backing up her account, that would be her husband, who got it second hand from her. And the other (who is also a second hand source) contradicts her account, with notes from the time she heard this second hand account (I think the therapy session was in 2012), vs the husbands memory of the session.

That’s some murky water there. Especially considering that she is not offering a date of the event, or the location of the event. With those two items one could at least attempt to verify/corroborate the story, (or in kavanaughs case) try to vindicate himself on the matter. Which would still be difficult because it was allegedly 36 years ago.

the FBI can look into it. trump says no. why?
The FBI already said they couldn’t. A. You can’t investigate something you don’t have a date, or time, specific location, any wittnesses present during the time, that was also 36 years ago. B. It’s not even an FBI matter, it’s a state matter.

the FBI did not say anything. they are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Who are the witnesses you refer to? Seems like that would make it an open and shut case.

witness' in the way of telling people of the incident years before this nomination was even in play.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.


of course you do.

despite the contradicting polygraph reports, you take HER word.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
No no no, she has a lie detector test saying that the reported statement is correct, as in, in line with the letter to fienstien. With lie detector tests, they’ll ask the same question in a few different ways, as well as the control questions. The question posed is a sneaky little lawyer trick. I think it’s telling that that was the only question offered to the public, or if that was the only question operator asked her on the subject.

And she has one person backing up her account, that would be her husband, who got it second hand from her. And the other (who is also a second hand source) contradicts her account, with notes from the time she heard this second hand account (I think the therapy session was in 2012), vs the husbands memory of the session.

That’s some murky water there. Especially considering that she is not offering a date of the event, or the location of the event. With those two items one could at least attempt to verify/corroborate the story, (or in kavanaughs case) try to vindicate himself on the matter. Which would still be difficult because it was allegedly 36 years ago.

the FBI can look into it. trump says no. why?
The FBI already said they couldn’t. A. You can’t investigate something you don’t have a date, or time, specific location, any wittnesses present during the time, that was also 36 years ago. B. It’s not even an FBI matter, it’s a state matter.

the FBI did not say anything. they are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


how many times have they already investigated his background?
 
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

Kavanaugh doesn't have to anything, it is Blasey who has to PROVE that she was assaulted.

he asked & i answered. but it sure would help him out if he did. soooooooooooo why not? if you could take a test to prove YOUR innocense- wouldn't you step up?
 
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.


of course you do.

despite the contradicting polygraph reports, you take HER word.

yes. why? i've been there, as have most females & got the scars to prove it.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.

You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.

They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.
 
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
No no no, she has a lie detector test saying that the reported statement is correct, as in, in line with the letter to fienstien. With lie detector tests, they’ll ask the same question in a few different ways, as well as the control questions. The question posed is a sneaky little lawyer trick. I think it’s telling that that was the only question offered to the public, or if that was the only question operator asked her on the subject.

And she has one person backing up her account, that would be her husband, who got it second hand from her. And the other (who is also a second hand source) contradicts her account, with notes from the time she heard this second hand account (I think the therapy session was in 2012), vs the husbands memory of the session.

That’s some murky water there. Especially considering that she is not offering a date of the event, or the location of the event. With those two items one could at least attempt to verify/corroborate the story, (or in kavanaughs case) try to vindicate himself on the matter. Which would still be difficult because it was allegedly 36 years ago.

the FBI can look into it. trump says no. why?
The FBI already said they couldn’t. A. You can’t investigate something you don’t have a date, or time, specific location, any wittnesses present during the time, that was also 36 years ago. B. It’s not even an FBI matter, it’s a state matter.

the FBI did not say anything. they are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


how many times have they already investigated his background?

so?
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Who are the witnesses you refer to? Seems like that would make it an open and shut case.

witness' in the way of telling people of the incident years before this nomination was even in play.

In a court of law that is called hearsay. Is there credible, tangible evidence of the truth of Ms Fords' allegation?
There have been too many women crying wolf and it being proven there is no wolf, for me to believe any allegation
without solid credible evidence that a crime occurred.
 

Forum List

Back
Top