How far back are we going to go to disqualify people from public office for sexual harrassment?

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.


of course you do.

despite the contradicting polygraph reports, you take HER word.
I think anyone who believes her is one gullible dumbass
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.

You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.

They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.

lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.
 
sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault


It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Who are the witnesses you refer to? Seems like that would make it an open and shut case.

witness' in the way of telling people of the incident years before this nomination was even in play.

In a court of law that is called hearsay. Is there credible, tangible evidence of the truth of Ms Fords' allegation?
There have been too many women crying wolf and it being proven there is no wolf, for me to believe any allegation
without solid credible evidence that a crime occurred.

how very typical & totally expected of you.
 
If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

Kavanaugh doesn't have to anything, it is Blasey who has to PROVE that she was assaulted.

he asked & i answered. but it sure would help him out if he did. soooooooooooo why not? if you could take a test to prove YOUR innocense- wouldn't you step up?

You are clearly ignorant on how accusations are treated in law. Since she made the accusations, she has to PROVE it, Kavanaugh can just sit back and watch her stumble all over the place. He doesn't have to do ANYTHING.
 
If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.


of course you do.

despite the contradicting polygraph reports, you take HER word.

yes. why? i've been there, as have most females & got the scars to prove it.

and in the last 35 odd years, not ONE other female has ever accused him of a similar offence.

raises a lot of doubt in my mind
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.

You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.

They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.

lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.

The bias, the bias she's blinded by the bias and her misandry.
 
why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

Kavanaugh doesn't have to anything, it is Blasey who has to PROVE that she was assaulted.

he asked & i answered. but it sure would help him out if he did. soooooooooooo why not? if you could take a test to prove YOUR innocense- wouldn't you step up?

You are clearly ignorant on how accusations are treated in law. Since she made the accusations, she has to PROVE it, Kavanaugh can just sit back and watch her stumble all over the place. He doesn't have to do ANYTHING.

i didn't say he did. did i? no... no i did not. oh... if congress flips- he can be impeached. he committed pergury on unrelated matters during his interview... so there is that.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Who are the witnesses you refer to? Seems like that would make it an open and shut case.

witness' in the way of telling people of the incident years before this nomination was even in play.

In a court of law that is called hearsay. Is there credible, tangible evidence of the truth of Ms Fords' allegation?
There have been too many women crying wolf and it being proven there is no wolf, for me to believe any allegation
without solid credible evidence that a crime occurred.

how very typical & totally expected of you.
 
why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.


of course you do.

despite the contradicting polygraph reports, you take HER word.

yes. why? i've been there, as have most females & got the scars to prove it.

and in the last 35 odd years, not ONE other female has ever accused him of a similar offence.

raises a lot of doubt in my mind

i'm sure it typically does.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.

You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.

They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.

lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.

Did you read the letter she wrote to Senator Feinstein?

It was 35 years ago!

She told NO ONE!

No physical evidence to examine!

The FBI has negligible to work with just they had negligible with Anita Hill's claims which were B.S.!
 
playtime said:
how very typical & totally expected of you.

Why, because of your bias, misandry and bitterness. You have no idea about me or where I stand. The only thing you know is I did not toady up to what you think and that makes me a horrible, evil very bad person.
Well get over it, I will never agree with a fanatic screwball.
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.

If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.


brett only has his word.

If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?

why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.

why?

Why not give him a polygraph?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

why don't you answer the question?

Why not give him a polygraph?

that would be fantastic. why hasn't he suggested taking one?

If his test says he's innocent, and her test says he's not,

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

HER.

"If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?"

against her test by a retired FBI agent? NO.

why? because of the extenuating circumstances.
A) she told 2 people years before. there are medical notes backing that up
B) documentation ( articles, books, yearbook pages ) that suggests more likely than not something could have happened... ritualistic heavy drinking clubs, a manwhoring club, mysogenistic writings & portrayals thru photographs....

why don't you answer the question?

boom. done.
Lol, you are unhinged

Kav will be a great Supreme Court Justice

No crime
 
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!

she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....

No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:

Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school

"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:

Screenshot: "

OOoops!!!

i am talking about her therapist & her husband.

oopsie.

You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.

They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.

lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.

The FBI has stated they will NOT investigate Kavanaugh because it is not a federal crime and exceeds the statute of limitations.

Breaking: FBI Will Not Investigate Christine Ford 36-Year-Old ever-Changing Allegations of Abuse
 
playtime said:
how very typical & totally expected of you.

Why, because of your bias, misandry and bitterness. You have no idea about me or where I stand. The only thing you know is I did not toady up to what you think and that makes me a horrible, evil very bad person.
Well get over it, I will never agree with a fanatic screwball.

lol... evil? my my... anyways, it's typical of someone who hasn't been in a situation like that.

, for someone who has - you can called me biased all you want, sweety.
 

Forum List

Back
Top