House Intel Impeachment Report Puts GOP Rep Devin Nunes In Hot Water

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,433
11,855
2,265
Here's a timeline of relevant dates and events
  • On April 1, Solomon published a piece in The Hill titled "Joe Biden's 2020 Ukrainian nightmare."
  • From April 1 to 7, the report said, Parnas spoke with Giuliani about 16 times and Solomon about 10 times.
  • On April 7, Solomon published an op-ed article attacking Yovanovitch.
  • On April 10, Giuliani and Nunes had several phone calls, and later Parnas and Solomon had a nearly five-minute call, the report said.
  • On April 12, Nunes and Parnas had a phone call that lasted 8 1/2 minutes, the report said.
The report's references to the phone calls are likely to increase scrutiny of the California Republican on top of other recent reports detailing his interactions with Parnas.


GOP Rep. Devin Nunes' phone calls with Giuliani and one of his indicted Ukraine associates showed up in the House's impeachment report

You're going to prison "cow" boy.

Isn't that reporter Solomon work for The Hill?

Isn't the Hill owned by Rupert Murdoch?

Didn't AG Barr visit Murdoch at his house in October?

Why Is William Barr Meeting With Rupert Murdoch?
 
Last edited:
Ahhhhhhh.....


source.gif
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

He's welcome to use that defense at his trial.
 
Here's a timeline of relevant dates and events
  • On April 1, Solomon published a piece in The Hill titled "Joe Biden's 2020 Ukrainian nightmare."
  • From April 1 to 7, the report said, Parnas spoke with Giuliani about 16 times and Solomon about 10 times.
  • On April 7, Solomon published an op-ed article attacking Yovanovitch.
  • On April 10, Giuliani and Nunes had several phone calls, and later Parnas and Solomon had a nearly five-minute call, the report said.
  • On April 12, Nunes and Parnas had a phone call that lasted 8 1/2 minutes, the report said.
The report's references to the phone calls are likely to increase scrutiny of the California Republican on top of other recent reports detailing his interactions with Parnas.


GOP Rep. Devin Nunes' phone calls with Giuliani and one of his indicted Ukraine associates showed up in the House's impeachment report

You're going to prison "cow" boy.

Isn't that reporter Solomon work for The Hill?

Isn't the Hill owned by Rupert Murdoch?

Didn't AG Barr visit Murdoch at his house in October?

Why Is William Barr Meeting With Rupert Murdoch?


So now Congresscritters have access to phone records?

Since when is it illegal for Nunes to talk to Giuliani on the phone or in person?

This isn’t going to go the way you think it is.
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

He's welcome to use that defense at his trial.

Looking forward to Schiff’s trial for violating civil rights.
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

Schitt used his subpoena power, abused rather. Never has Congressional subpoena power been used to obtain phone records. AT&T handed them over without a court order, they may be taken to court and sued silly.

Schiff also got the phone records of a journalist.

The Dems are dead in the water. Today they trotted out a bunch of Ivy League professors to testify about how Orange man is bad and the Founders would support impeachment.
 
Next week Schiff-for-brains can subpoena your email because he thinks you are a Russian troll.
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

He's welcome to use that defense at his trial.




Wow the person you replied to is so stupid but they're a russian bot so it's expected.

The truth is that the records were subpoenaed. First subpoena went to the trump administration asking for records. All requests and subpoenas were ignored.

So the democrats subpoenaed the phone company. AT&T.

It was a legal and constitutional subpoena which AT&T quickly complied with.

It was done legally.

There was no assault on anyone's rights. At least not by the democrats in their investigation.
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

He's welcome to use that defense at his trial.

Looking forward to Schiff’s trial for violating civil rights.



Then you will be waiting for the rest of your life for something that will never happen.

Schiff didn't violate anyone's civil rights.

He did it legally with a subpoena to AT&T.

Schiff isn't going to face any trial for anything because he didn't violate any laws.

Too bad for you.

Deal with it.
 
How does he get private conversations especially of a private citizen that has not been accused of any crime....CALLING AG BARR TO INVESTIGATE HOW SCHITT DID THIS...WAS THEREA COURT ORDER, AND IF SO WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE INCURSION INTO PRIVACY, A DIRECT ASSAULT ON CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!!

He's welcome to use that defense at his trial.




Wow the person you replied to is so stupid but they're a russian bot so it's expected.

The truth is that the records were subpoenaed. First subpoena went to the trump administration asking for records. All requests and subpoenas were ignored.

So the democrats subpoenaed the phone company. AT&T.

It was a legal and constitutional subpoena which AT&T quickly complied with.

It was done legally.

There was no assault on anyone's rights. At least not by the democrats in their investigation.
You are truly an ass...

'It's your abuse of power': Impeachment witness rips Congress for obstruction of justice claim
13 hours ago · Professor Jonathan Turley criticized Congress for implying that President Trump was obstructing justice by going to the Supreme Court for rulings about impeachment. Turley was asked about the recent court ruling where White House counsel Don McGahn was ordered to testify after
 
Here's a timeline of relevant dates and events
  • On April 1, Solomon published a piece in The Hill titled "Joe Biden's 2020 Ukrainian nightmare."
  • From April 1 to 7, the report said, Parnas spoke with Giuliani about 16 times and Solomon about 10 times.
  • On April 7, Solomon published an op-ed article attacking Yovanovitch.
  • On April 10, Giuliani and Nunes had several phone calls, and later Parnas and Solomon had a nearly five-minute call, the report said.
  • On April 12, Nunes and Parnas had a phone call that lasted 8 1/2 minutes, the report said.
The report's references to the phone calls are likely to increase scrutiny of the California Republican on top of other recent reports detailing his interactions with Parnas.


GOP Rep. Devin Nunes' phone calls with Giuliani and one of his indicted Ukraine associates showed up in the House's impeachment report

You're going to prison "cow" boy.

Isn't that reporter Solomon work for The Hill?

Isn't the Hill owned by Rupert Murdoch?

Didn't AG Barr visit Murdoch at his house in October?

Why Is William Barr Meeting With Rupert Murdoch?
Its chilling that democrats and the Deep State are spying on members of congress
 
Here's a timeline of relevant dates and events
  • On April 1, Solomon published a piece in The Hill titled "Joe Biden's 2020 Ukrainian nightmare."
  • From April 1 to 7, the report said, Parnas spoke with Giuliani about 16 times and Solomon about 10 times.
  • On April 7, Solomon published an op-ed article attacking Yovanovitch.
  • On April 10, Giuliani and Nunes had several phone calls, and later Parnas and Solomon had a nearly five-minute call, the report said.
  • On April 12, Nunes and Parnas had a phone call that lasted 8 1/2 minutes, the report said.
The report's references to the phone calls are likely to increase scrutiny of the California Republican on top of other recent reports detailing his interactions with Parnas.


GOP Rep. Devin Nunes' phone calls with Giuliani and one of his indicted Ukraine associates showed up in the House's impeachment report

You're going to prison "cow" boy.

Isn't that reporter Solomon work for The Hill?

Isn't the Hill owned by Rupert Murdoch?

Didn't AG Barr visit Murdoch at his house in October?

Why Is William Barr Meeting With Rupert Murdoch?


So now Congresscritters have access to phone records?

Since when is it illegal for Nunes to talk to Giuliani on the phone or in person?

This isn’t going to go the way you think it is.
When they are conspiring to do something that could be illegal. Only illegals don't care about the law, right wingers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top