Hey Fox...Keep On Blowing Romney And Hammering The POTUS

[Unkotare]

I agree with the OP and the same goes for MSNBC on the opposite angle.

The only difference I see are the outright lies by Sean Hannity and used to be Glenn Beck. Both of those guys are as bad as Lush Rambo. I've been watching Rachel Maddow, Ed Schult and Lawrence O'Donnell for so long I can't remember it and though slanting the truth I've never heard an out right, bare faced lie.

You won't hear anything they don't want you to because you are a mindless, lefty bobble-head bigot.

 

[Mac1958]

I said I don't get news from them, I watch them for Entertainment.

You watch both Fox News and MSNBC, but get no news from either of them?

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

 

[SniperFire]

And my response was that I dont watch ABC news to know or care. Is that too hard to grasp? Need crayons & glitter glue?

So, really, you are ignorant on the 'hard' news that is being disseminated by the MSM.

This is why your take on the topic is so poorly thought out.

I dont watch network news for my "hard news,"

I see. Does your news source present all of the 'hard' news available?

 

[G.T.]

You watch both Fox News and MSNBC, but get no news from either of them?

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

Let's try this again, retard.

Fox and MSNBC present news, albeit partisan news in your mind, correct?

Partisan News should not be given the respect of being called "News" at all. I call what they give me "Entertainment," because I sit and watch these channels for laughs and amazement - like - "aaaahahaha, I know why they cherry picked this, but I'll bet the retards will buy that narrative! Classic!" - - - - - - or, "wow, they're not even GOOD or Covert @ their spinning, I can imagine the marroons @ home nodding in agreement! HAAAAAA HAAAA"

Is roughly my inner dialogue when I watch these stations.

 

[Truthmatters]

Ifg you think that MSNBC doesnt provide solid news then you need to watch Madow and Ratigan

 

[SniperFire]

You watch both Fox News and MSNBC, but get no news from either of them?

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

I don't disagree.

But let's not pretend Diane Sawyer is interested in presenting all the news that is fit to print, and there is therefore no need for a broadcast media balance.

 

[Truthmatters]

Pretending any other station is as bad as fox is bullshit

 

[Mac1958]

Ifg you think that MSNBC doesnt provide solid news then you need to watch Madow and Ratigan

Okay, I don't want to put words in your mouth here. Are you saying that Maddow is a news show?

.

 

[G.T.]

So, really, you are ignorant on the 'hard' news that is being disseminated by the MSM.

This is why your take on the topic is so poorly thought out.

I dont watch network news for my "hard news,"

I see. Does your news source present all of the 'hard' news available?

That's impossible, touch-hole. There's more than 100 million hard news stories available, daily. Are you going to find somewhere that can keep up with that? No, you're not. But imagining that there's only "HEADLINES" out there, and they're "Few and far between," and then seeing one station "report (tee-hee)" them and another not and saying "seeeeeee mawww, dey are deee onweeee stashun that reports on MY VIEW of thangs!"

Is a bit like the baby-talk I do for my Daughter - nobody gives a shit what I'm saying, it just sounds really funny and silly and it's neat-0 for entertainment value.

 

[Mac1958]

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

I don't disagree.

But let's not pretend Diane Sawyer is interested in presenting all the news that is fit to print, and there is therefore no need for a broadcast media balance.

While it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case, I'd join GT in saying that I don't watch ABC news or Diane Sawyer. I do have a vague recollection of watching her at some point and thinking, "ugh, standard lefty spin", but I couldn't say what the topic was.

Having spent about 20 years in that business in a former life, I know the environment quite well. Don't get me started.

.

 

[SniperFire]

I dont watch network news for my "hard news,"

I see. Does your news source present all of the 'hard' news available?

That's impossible, touch-hole.

Now we are getting somewhere. Nobody has complete command of the 'hard' news, much less the right to define it for anyone else.

Does Fox News EVER present hard news not presented by NBC, ABC or CBS?

 

[G.T.]

I see. Does your news source present all of the 'hard' news available?

That's impossible, touch-hole.

Now we are getting somewhere. Nobody has complete command of the 'hard' news, much less the right to define it for anyone else.

Does Fox News EVER present hard news not presented by NBC, ABC or CBS?

I would call nothing hard news on fox or msnbc. It's always dressed up in a package meant for retards like you.

 

[WillowTree]

As sure as tides and taxes you can depend on a depends wearing liberoidal retarded libturd to bitch about fox news..






their rants are as impressive as a 172 pound vagina.

 

[SniperFire]

That's impossible, touch-hole.

Now we are getting somewhere. Nobody has complete command of the 'hard' news, much less the right to define it for anyone else.

Does Fox News EVER present hard news not presented by NBC, ABC or CBS?

I would call nothing hard news on fox or msnbc.

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

You watch both Fox News and MSNBC, but get no news from either of them?

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

Problem there is, the networks decide what is newsworthy... i.e., yesterday I was surfing CNN Mobile.. the headlines were 3 stories about the Socialist victories in France and intermixed with them was one story about Romney selling out to the conservatives.

No agenda there, right?

 

[SniperFire]

As sure as tides and taxes you can depend on a depends wearing liberoidal retarded libturd to bitch about fox news..






their rants are as impressive as a 172 pound vagina.

Well, I didn't need that visual this morning!

 

[G.T.]

Now we are getting somewhere. Nobody has complete command of the 'hard' news, much less the right to define it for anyone else.

Does Fox News EVER present hard news not presented by NBC, ABC or CBS?

I would call nothing hard news on fox or msnbc.

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

 

[SniperFire]

I would call nothing hard news on fox or msnbc.

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

Can I ask what your all-inclusive, definitive source for all hard news would be?

 

[SniperFire]

I would call nothing hard news on fox or msnbc.

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

And while we are at it, asswipe, would any story on Fox or MSNBC which also appears in your definitive source for 'hard' news make you take ignorant and foolish?

 

[Unkotare]

Pretending any other station is as bad as fox is bullshit

Do you type shit like that with a straight face?