Hey Fox...Keep On Blowing Romney And Hammering The POTUS

[G.T.]

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

Can I ask what your all-inclusive, definitive source for all hard news would be?

If I state any source whatsoever, you will counter with your opinion of "it" which is really annoying, trite and irrelevant to me. Plus, I already know your response to it, and so do YOU already have a planned response for it, so the dishonesty would be too much to bare.

But a simple answer would be that nothing on cable is a viable news source, and what News sources I do use outside of Cable are not believed in the singular without a trust but verify type of mentality, unlike how you view Fox as sort of a Bible of sorts. Does that all make sense? Prolly nawt, but what ya gunna do huh?> Boo00000ring.

 

[G.T.]

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

And while we are at it, asswipe, would any story on Fox or MSNBC which also appears in your definitive source for 'hard' news make you take ignorant and foolish?

It's not the story, it's the way and reason of which it is presented. Please tell me you got that by now.

 

[SniperFire]

Nothing at all?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

And while we are at it, asswipe, would any story on Fox or MSNBC which also appears in your definitive source for 'hard' news make you take ignorant and foolish?

bump

 

[SniperFire]

G.T.

Why are you not willing to share with the board your all-inclusive, definitive source on 'hard' news?

Do you not think we could all benefit from your sharing of it?

 

[G.T.]

G.T.

Why are you not willing to share with the board your all-inclusive, definitive source on 'hard' news?

Do you not think we could all benefit from your sharing of it?

Because in my post and quite clearly, I told you that I dont use any source as all inclusive and definitive but I trust but verify.

Do you not know what trust but verify means? You get dumber and dumber.

It means that I dont take ANY source at face value, but verify with others. Is that helpful enough for you?

 

[Mac1958]

Yes, this is exactly right. When I'm going for news, I dont do the fucking partisan cable networks, jeez - I'm not retarded!

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

Problem there is, the networks decide what is newsworthy... i.e., yesterday I was surfing CNN Mobile.. the headlines were 3 stories about the Socialist victories in France and intermixed with them was one story about Romney selling out to the conservatives.

No agenda there, right?

Yeah, that's why a person has to access a wide variety of "news" sources to get a full picture of what's actually happening. Problem is, there are still far too many people who access just one source and believe it.

Seems to me it shouldn't be that way, but it is what it is.

.

 

[Unkotare]

No, they dont deserve that credence lent to them, they do a disservice to the morons who cannot see past their Agenda and it's so obviously a disservice to YOU in particular, because you're clearly dumbed down by it.

Can I ask what your all-inclusive, definitive source for all hard news would be?

If I state any source whatsoever, you will counter with your opinion of "it" which is really annoying, trite and irrelevant to me. Plus, I already know your response to it, and so do YOU already have a planned response for it, so the dishonesty would be too much to bare[SIC].

So you're going to shamelessly duck? Pretty chickenshit response, champ.

 

[G.T.]

Can I ask what your all-inclusive, definitive source for all hard news would be?

If I state any source whatsoever, you will counter with your opinion of "it" which is really annoying, trite and irrelevant to me. Plus, I already know your response to it, and so do YOU already have a planned response for it, so the dishonesty would be too much to bare[SIC].

So you're going to shamelessly duck? Pretty chickenshit response, champ.

There's no need to respond to a brainless partisan - see: self. You're all delusional twits who just daily enter this dirty little world where you can demean others who disagree with you while ignoring fact and logic. It's so sad that I am going to troll hard against it, from here forth.

 

[SniperFire]

G.T.

Why are you not willing to share with the board your all-inclusive, definitive source on 'hard' news?

Do you not think we could all benefit from your sharing of it?

Because in my post and quite clearly, I told you that I dont use any source as all inclusive and definitive but I trust but verify.

Strange that you wouldn't give us the sources of hard news which you consider to be definitive and to which is provided in 100% exclusivity to Fox News and MSNBC.

This news source(s) would be of great benefit to all readers.

Perhaps you are you just afraid of being exposed? Well, abandon that fear as it has already been realized.

 

[G.T.]

The best an intellectually curious news consumer can do is get the primary subject of the story from one of the networks and then do their own research, examining multiple sources carefully before forming an opinion, rather than believe the slanted crap that network is giving them. So, in that way, Fox or MSNBC can be a good jumping-off point.

But that's about it.

.

Problem there is, the networks decide what is newsworthy... i.e., yesterday I was surfing CNN Mobile.. the headlines were 3 stories about the Socialist victories in France and intermixed with them was one story about Romney selling out to the conservatives.

No agenda there, right?

Yeah, that's why a person has to access a wide variety of "news" sources to get a full picture of what's actually happening. Problem is, there are still far too many people who access just one source and believe it.

Seems to me it shouldn't be that way, but it is what it is.

.

egg sack, lee.

 

[G.T.]

G.T.

Why are you not willing to share with the board your all-inclusive, definitive source on 'hard' news?

Do you not think we could all benefit from your sharing of it?

Because in my post and quite clearly, I told you that I dont use any source as all inclusive and definitive but I trust but verify.

Strange that you wouldn't give us the sources of hard news which you consider to be definitive and to which Fox News and MSNBC only provide 100% exclusivity of hard news.

This news source(s) would be of great benefit to all readers.

Perhaps you are you just afraid of being exposed? Well, abandon that fear as it has already been realized.

doctor, fix his brain.

trust but verify = consider none definitive.

you are dumb as cheese, my dude.

 

[Unkotare]

If I state any source whatsoever, you will counter with your opinion of "it" which is really annoying, trite and irrelevant to me. Plus, I already know your response to it, and so do YOU already have a planned response for it, so the dishonesty would be too much to bare[SIC].

So you're going to shamelessly duck? Pretty chickenshit response, champ.

There's no need to respond to a brainless partisan -

More chickenshit, I see. Not covering yourself in glory here, champ.

 

[Truthmatters]

cant you provide something beyond personal insults.

Try using some facts to prove a point or something for a damned change

 

[SniperFire]

You are spamming, GT.


Why not reveal your 'hard' news sources which are 100% exclusive of the news which is presented on FOX or MSNBC?


Don't you think everyone could benefit from such an amazing news service?

What are you afraid of?

 

[G.T.]

You are spamming, GT.


Why not reveal your 'hard' news sources which are 100% exclusive of the news which is presented on FOX or MSNBC?


Don't you think everyone could benefit from such an amazing news service?

What are you afraid of?

the correct answer is you are an idiot who cant even comprehend this simple conversation, let alone any hard news.

 

[SniperFire]

You are spamming, GT.


Why not reveal your 'hard' news sources which are 100% exclusive of the news which is presented on FOX or MSNBC?


Don't you think everyone could benefit from such an amazing news service?

What are you afraid of?

the correct answer is you are an idiot who cant even comprehend this simple conversation, let alone any hard news.

Punt accepted and returned for a touchdown.

Up your game in the future.

LOL

 

[LogikAndReazon]

This coming from the Pmsnbc, dailykos, moveon, rolling stone, jon stewart, clueless adolescent "occupier" contingent...........

Marxism, weed and revolucion !!!! lol

 

[G.T.]

More cornballishness from a partisan cornball.

 

[SniperFire]

More cornballishness from a partisan cornball.

It it really partisan of us to ask you to reveal your great non-partisan, definitive 'hard' news sources?

Why are you pissing yourself over revealing them?

Don't you think others could benefit from the sharing of your great resources?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Hey Fox...Keep On Blowing Romney And Hammering The POTUS

....And, developing new "talent".....​

"…Tom Umberg, a former Army colonel and military prosecutor, said Stein persisted even after being warned.

“The Marine Corps gave him the opportunity to think about his actions, yet Sgt. Stein continued to undermine the chain of command,” said Umberg, who was not involved in Stein’s case. “I think his purpose was to leave the Marine Corps in a dramatic fashion in order to begin a career in talk radio or what have you.”

"Porky Limbaugh" On 'Roids​