Harvard Study Shows Liberals are Lemmings

[NYcarbineer]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Given the election of Trump, it's pretty hard to argue that conservatives aren't just as gullible as liberals.

He campaigned on the issues that mainstream voters wanted to hear. They were forgotten by WashingtonDC elites in both parties.

He also sold Trump University on pitches that people wanted to hear.

 

[Bush92]

[

/---- If we do will you libtards attack them like you do Fox News and Rush?

Attacking if fine, it's part of the debate that drives a free society. What I object to is extortion, such as that used by the Soros Brown Shirts to threaten advertisers who buy space on Breitbart or other conservative sites. What the fascist democrats do is openly criminal. Of course they can boycott, but the threats that if an advertiser supports ideas that the fascists object to, they will organize campaigns to destroy that business is intimidation and extortion.

It's thought control by constant bombardment of liberal media and education system to influence people to become more liberal. Conservatism is portrayed as negative. Close minded. Hateful. When in reality the opposite is true. Liberals are group that wants to suppress free speech and attack people who disagree with them.

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's presidency itself has been about 95% negative,

I'd say 93% negative coverage in the media is 2 points biased in his favor.

Creating jobs, border security, negotiating fair trade deals is "negative?" Stopping the murder of the unborn is " negative?" Supporting law enforcement is "negative?"

 

[NYcarbineer]

Since Trump's presidency itself has been about 95% negative,

I'd say 93% negative coverage in the media is 2 points biased in his favor.

Creating jobs, border security, negotiating fair trade deals is "negative?" Stopping the murder of the unborn is " negative?" Supporting law enforcement is "negative?"

He hasn't created any jobs, the border wall is a joke, he's flip flopped on trade deals.

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's presidency itself has been about 95% negative,

I'd say 93% negative coverage in the media is 2 points biased in his favor.

Creating jobs, border security, negotiating fair trade deals is "negative?" Stopping the murder of the unborn is " negative?" Supporting law enforcement is "negative?"

He hasn't created any jobs, the border wall is a joke, he's flip flopped on trade deals.

Wrong...it's coming...and wrong. Democrats and liberal media are being obstructionist.

 

[Siete]

and RussianWigers are poor little snowflakes ..

 

[BluesLegend]

Harvard Study Shows Liberals are Lemmings

President Trump will put an end to needless studies, we knew that already.

 

[debbiedowner]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Maybe you should start a thread "Harvard study concludes RW's are outright liars"

 

[debbiedowner]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.

So? If you want more conservative media, start more media companies.

show some initiative.

Who will they get as journalists that down the road won't have to pay scores of sexual harrasment claims? Wait, maybe they can convert weiner to conservatism.

 

[Bush92]

and RussianWigers are poor little snowflakes ..

What about Russia? What does that have to o with Trump?

 

[Bush92]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Hey Captain Obvious...it's because the news rooms and editor desks are dominated by liberals who voted for Hillary.

So? If you want more conservative media, start more media companies.

show some initiative.

Who will they get as journalists that down the road won't have to pay scores of sexual harrasment claims? Wait, maybe they can convert weiner to conservatism.

If you are referring to O'Reilly...he was not a "journalist." Niether is Joe Scarborough, Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddows and others. But on the journalistic side of things, these reporters for the Times and Post, when they report on unsubstantiated bullshit and feed what in overwhelming left wing attack machine on cable news...now you see, your going in dangerous directions.

 

[my2¢]

Who trusts Harvard?

 

[Bush92]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Maybe you should start a thread "Harvard study concludes RW's are outright liars"

Perhaps you should turn and run away from the cliffs edge lemming.

 

[Bush92]

Who trusts Harvard?

Liberals love "Harvard studies." But they will reject this one because it does not fit tightly into what they have been programmed to believe since their days in public schools.

 

[my2¢]

Who trusts Harvard?

Liberals love "Harvard studies." But they will reject this one because it does not fit tightly into what they have been programmed to believe since their days in public schools.

I can't imagine what in the article will they could find objectionable except that the amount of negative coverage deserves to be even greater and FOX skewed the results.

 

[Siete]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Maybe you should start a thread "Harvard study concludes RW's are outright liars"

Perhaps you should turn and run away from the cliffs edge lemming.

perhaps you should go put on your pink snowflake apron, and go whine about everything under the sun ...

 

[Bush92]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Byron York/Washington Examiner

The article doesn't say a god damn thing about "Liberals". Doesn't even mention the word. At all.

You lied. Not that that's news.

What's more, the study it links to --- actually does mention the word "Liberal". Once. Here it is:

>> Presidents are more than the main focus of U.S. reporters. Presidents are also their main target. Although journalists are accused of having a liberal bias, their real bias is a preference for the negative.[22] News reporting turned sour during the Vietnam and Watergate era and has stayed that way.[23] Journalists’ incentives, everything from getting their stories on the air to acquiring a reputation as a hard-hitting reporter, encourage journalists to focus on what’s wrong with politicians rather than what’s right.[24] <<​

Maybe you should start a thread "Harvard study concludes RW's are outright liars"

Perhaps you should turn and run away from the cliffs edge lemming.

perhaps you should go put on your pink snowflake apron, and go whine about everything under the sun ...

No that's the Democrats. They and news media can't get over Trump 2016 victory and now their temper tantrum is becoming a danger to the United States.

 

[Pogo]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Given the election of Trump, it's pretty hard to argue that conservatives aren't just as gullible as liberals.

He campaigned on the issues that mainstream voters wanted to hear. They were forgotten by WashingtonDC elites in both parties.

"Told them what they wanted to hear", exactly. Famous last words.
Thanks for fessing up to groveling over a con artist. You're in plentiful company --- there's one of you born every minute according to the guy whose name is used to describe Rump by his own sister.

 

[Bush92]

Liberals INGSOC is telling you, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Liberals have mush for brains and believe everything fed to them by the Ministry of Truth ran mainstream media. Fucking lemmings.
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

Given the election of Trump, it's pretty hard to argue that conservatives aren't just as gullible as liberals.

He campaigned on the issues that mainstream voters wanted to hear. They were forgotten by WashingtonDC elites in both parties.

"Told them what they wanted to hear", exactly. Famous last words.
Thanks for fessing up to groveling over a con artist. You're in plentiful company --- there's one of you born every minute according to the guy whose name is used to describe Rump by his own sister.

That's right, spoke about issues important to those voters. Told them what they wanted to hear...he heard them...and now he is acting on it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The ridiculously false premise here is that no matter how well or how badly a president is doing,

the media is somehow expected to artificially concoct a stew of 50% positive 50% negative stories about that president.

That is sheer idiocy.