Harvard atheist has vision, converts to Catholicism

Your argument fails...
You might as well have said nanny nanny boo boo.
But I didn’t. Instead I pointed out that your argument failed...
Same difference.
Only in your mind. It takes no effort of faith, to have not been convinced of the conclusions offered by theists. Though your position desires that it does, so that you may, again... attempt to draw parity between your faith in a God, and others lack thereof. It’s a personal disconnect of yours.
Not only in my mind, on paper too.

You blanket denial without any supporting basis says a lot.

ding, please don't cast more of your pearls to fools.
 
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
 
I'm afraid the average atheists enjoys all the attention he gets merely for stubbornly clinging to a belief in nothingness.
 
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
 
Last edited:
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
.
Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.

easy, not one of them is an original - those they burned.


Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

is this forgery why you became a christian, they were motivated in the 4th century how could you turn them down.
 
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
.
Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.

easy, not one of them is an original - those they burned.


Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

is this forgery why you became a christian, they were motivated in the 4th century how could you turn them down.
Prove it.
 
your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
.
Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.

easy, not one of them is an original - those they burned.


Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

is this forgery why you became a christian, they were motivated in the 4th century how could you turn them down.
Prove it.
.
Prove it.

you did not answer the question -
 
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
Demonstrate that a single one one of them demonstrate proof of the god you're claiming it does. No need for 24,000 at once. Let's just take them one at a time. By your leave...
 
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
Demonstrate that a single one one of them demonstrate proof of the god you're claiming it does. No need for 24,000 at once. Let's just take them one at a time. By your leave...
That’s easy. Read the NT. It’s full of proof that Jesus is God.
 
Last edited:
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
.
Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.

easy, not one of them is an original - those they burned.


Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

is this forgery why you became a christian, they were motivated in the 4th century how could you turn them down.
Prove it.
.
Prove it.

you did not answer the question -
It’s a trick question. They aren’t forgeries.

Where are the original texts that you believe? There aren’t any, right? So how can there be forgeries? Answer that question.
 
your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
Demonstrate that a single one one of them demonstrate proof of the god you're claiming it does. No need for 24,000 at once. Let's just take them one at a time. By your leave...
That’s easy. Read the NT. It’s full of proof that Jesus is God.
Lol! No. It isn't. That's like telling some one to read Harry Potter, or Lord of the Rings... If there are any specific offered in this book you'd like to offer; I'd be more than willing to look at the claims made... Start with proving that the "Jesus" portrayed in the Bible even existed. That would be a good start. Though a long, long way from proving any man was ever more than just that. A man.
 
Are we supposed to be impressed that he is a Harvard professor?

Meet Roy Schoeman, a former Professor at Harvard Business School, as he speaks about his acceptance of atheism when he went to university and how it dragged him into a pit of hopelessness. He shares how God personally intervened in his life in a miraculous way. Now working as a catholic speaker and inspiring thousands of believers and nonbelievers with his story, he has found the true meaning of life and the overflowing ocean of God's Love.
-------------------------------
He gave it up, it dragged him into a pit of hopelessness, now he write books and gives sermons at churches, really an evangelical catholic. He seen Jesus!

Its called messianic Judaism.:rolleyes:
 
24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.
.
Then your beliefs are not based upon evidence but are a leap of faith.

your belief is not faith but in a book written in the 4th century ... a political document.

24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise.

how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
Demonstrate that a single one one of them demonstrate proof of the god you're claiming it does. No need for 24,000 at once. Let's just take them one at a time. By your leave...
That’s easy. Read the NT. It’s full of proof that Jesus is God.
Lol! No. It isn't. That's like telling some one to read Harry Potter, or Lord of the Rings... If there are any specific offered in this book you'd like to offer; I'd be more than willing to look at the claims made... Start with proving that the "Jesus" portrayed in the Bible even existed. That would be a good start. Though a long, long way from proving any man was ever more than just that. A man.
24,000 written manuscripts prove he did and tell his account. That’s where we get it from.
 
.
how's that ...

your lame response only reinforces your beliefs are nothing more than substance for a book worm. same as the foolish conversion made by another relying on the pretext of a forged document. your claimed evidence, creation has nothing to do with christianity.
How do 24,000 written manuscripts say otherwise?

It’s proof. It’s evidence. Lots of proof and lots of evidence.

Prove 24,000 written manuscripts are forgeries.
Demonstrate that a single one one of them demonstrate proof of the god you're claiming it does. No need for 24,000 at once. Let's just take them one at a time. By your leave...
That’s easy. Read the NT. It’s full of proof that Jesus is God.
Lol! No. It isn't. That's like telling some one to read Harry Potter, or Lord of the Rings... If there are any specific offered in this book you'd like to offer; I'd be more than willing to look at the claims made... Start with proving that the "Jesus" portrayed in the Bible even existed. That would be a good start. Though a long, long way from proving any man was ever more than just that. A man.
24,000 written manuscripts prove he did and tell his account. That’s where we get it from.
No. They dont. One could likely conjure up as many documents, and “accounts” touting the existence of Bigfoot, and aliens. But I'll play along; since your so convinced of the veracity of these documents. Let's examine them. One by one...
Which is the first one you'd like to offer as evidence that god exists?
 
Last edited:
Another thread of intolerant bigots. That seems to be the way this board is anymore. No discussion, no exchanging ideas. Just bigotry, intolerance and hate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top