2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,981
- 52,264
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #181
Doesnt matter who they go after. They have to prove negligence. Remington can counter sue for court costs. You need to speak to an attorney so you are more educated on how this works.Yes so what?So what if they go after the gun store? Doesnt mean they will win. No one is going to see the validity of such a scenario. See above where I said you can be sued for anything. You dont need some random court case to turn out the way you want to do that.No.......they are going to go after gun stores that sell a gun to someone who passes a background check, but then gives or sells it to a felon....that is their game....and this case helps that effort....
All it takes is to take someone to court...it costs money to defend yourself from a lawsuit of this kind....and the anti gunners have lots of money to go after gun stores...
So What? Do you know how much a defense against a harrassment lawsuit can cost?.....10s of thousands of dollars if not more, and these anti-gunners are supported by anti gun groups with millions to throw into these law suits...
Thats the consequences of doing business in our litigious society. I dont see how not selling someone a weapon in the interest of safety can be considered harassment. Are you sure you know what you are talking about?
They are trying to go after Remington for the Sandy Hook shooting....the company ate the costs of the case...but it cost them a lot of money...they didn't even sell the gun to the woman, and they were still sued, it should never have gone forward.....
I know how it works and so do the anti gunners....they understand they can target individual, small gun stores...who do not have the resources for a protracted court battle, and put them out of business...and then scare other people from even trying to open up new gun stores....they are no better than the klan keeping blacks from voting.....