Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually, upon further reading, it seems likely that the child was NOT the target.
However, that doesn't change the fact that our intelligence was so bad that we touted his killing as that of a 21-year-old. And we were so proud of it that we put it in news releases ahead of the man who may have been the actual target.
This kind of recklessness and ignorance is what comes of not holding our government accountable and only caring about the constitution when dealing with someone we are sympathetic to.
You are worried about the wrong thing.... age is irrelevant to me.
Im worried about the hitman in the White House.
Me too. But this thread was about the child - and our scarily bad intelligence which didn't even know the ages of the most wanted man's American-born children.
I exhausted myself arguing about the hit being put out on the father in other threads.
On the subject of the father, I continue to hope that the ACLU and at least some diehard media members will keep the pressure on about it. I don't have the resources, and obviously it's a losing battle to fight on these boards where so many people right and left say, "too bad, so sad" in what seems to me to be a shortsighted manner.
Absolutely. Fuckem.Quit calling people with pubic hair children. They're mature enough ( or should be) to know the consequences of their actions.
Warren Jeff's victims had pubic hair. I still consider them children.
Absolutely. Fuckem.Quit calling people with pubic hair children. They're mature enough ( or should be) to know the consequences of their actions.
Warren Jeff's victims had pubic hair. I still consider them children.
Until I get over my concern about the constitution and targeting Americans without filing charges against them ... or even doing even enough research to learn their age? Fat chance.
Just how sucky are our intelligence agencies that they would tout the killing of a child by declaring that they took out a 21-year-old?
Again, how do you know it was not the other people in the terrorist cell that were the target? You don't. All you know is that this little terrorist got killed along with the rest of them.
boohoo... Allahu Akbar for that.
Actually, upon further reading, it seems likely that the child was NOT the target.
However, that doesn't change the fact that our intelligence was so bad that we touted his killing as that of a 21-year-old. And we were so proud of it that we put it in news releases ahead of the man who may have been the actual target.
This kind of recklessness and ignorance is what comes of not holding our government accountable and only caring about the constitution when dealing with someone we are sympathetic to.
Absolutely. Fuckem.Quit calling people with pubic hair children. They're mature enough ( or should be) to know the consequences of their actions.
Warren Jeff's victims had pubic hair. I still consider them children.
Apples and watermelons my friend.... what did Warren Jeffs' victim ever do to deserve to be raped by that animal?
Again, how do you know it was not the other people in the terrorist cell that were the target? You don't. All you know is that this little terrorist got killed along with the rest of them.
boohoo... Allahu Akbar for that.
Actually, upon further reading, it seems likely that the child was NOT the target.
However, that doesn't change the fact that our intelligence was so bad that we touted his killing as that of a 21-year-old. And we were so proud of it that we put it in news releases ahead of the man who may have been the actual target.
This kind of recklessness and ignorance is what comes of not holding our government accountable and only caring about the constitution when dealing with someone we are sympathetic to.
So you were wrong that we target "innocent children" I really don't care about faulty intel on some little terrorists age was wrong. As i said before... i don't care if it was women breast feeding babies.
We took the strike..and killed all who were in the cell.
WOHOO job well done.
Again, how do you know it was not the other people in the terrorist cell that were the target? You don't. All you know is that this little terrorist got killed along with the rest of them.
boohoo... Allahu Akbar for that.
Actually, upon further reading, it seems likely that the child was NOT the target.
However, that doesn't change the fact that our intelligence was so bad that we touted his killing as that of a 21-year-old. And we were so proud of it that we put it in news releases ahead of the man who may have been the actual target.
This kind of recklessness and ignorance is what comes of not holding our government accountable and only caring about the constitution when dealing with someone we are sympathetic to.
So you were wrong that we target "innocent children" I really don't care about faulty intel on some little terrorists age was wrong. As i said before... i don't care if it was women breast feeding babies.
We took the strike..and killed all who were in the cell.
WOHOO job well done.
Actually, upon further reading, it seems likely that the child was NOT the target.
However, that doesn't change the fact that our intelligence was so bad that we touted his killing as that of a 21-year-old. And we were so proud of it that we put it in news releases ahead of the man who may have been the actual target.
This kind of recklessness and ignorance is what comes of not holding our government accountable and only caring about the constitution when dealing with someone we are sympathetic to.
So you were wrong that we target "innocent children" I really don't care about faulty intel on some little terrorists age was wrong. As i said before... i don't care if it was women breast feeding babies.
We took the strike..and killed all who were in the cell.
WOHOO job well done.
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not.
So you were wrong that we target "innocent children" I really don't care about faulty intel on some little terrorists age was wrong. As i said before... i don't care if it was women breast feeding babies.
We took the strike..and killed all who were in the cell.
WOHOO job well done.
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not.
So?
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not.
So?
Yeah, I know. The constitution is toilet paper. We're as bad as the enemy. And we're all going to hell. Some of us sooner than others.
Well. They weren't the sort that kills their parents for insurance money or kills and rapes a neighbor.Absolutely. Fuckem.Quit calling people with pubic hair children. They're mature enough ( or should be) to know the consequences of their actions.
Warren Jeff's victims had pubic hair. I still consider them children.
Yeah, I know. The constitution is toilet paper. We're as bad as the enemy. And we're all going to hell. Some of us sooner than others.
Need a tissue?
No thanks.
I have several copies of the Constitution to use.
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not know enough to skirt the constitution in the way we have done.
Yeah, I know. The constitution is toilet paper. We're as bad as the enemy. And we're all going to hell. Some of us sooner than others.
Need a tissue?
No thanks.
I have several copies of the Constitution to use.
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not know enough to skirt the constitution in the way we have done.
Exactly.... Im glad they are dead, but the way it was done stinks.
Why is everyone OK with the POTUS killing with no impunity
No thanks.
I have several copies of the Constitution to use.
Cool.
I think the main gripe is the fact that the Constitution is being skirted as well as Congress... thats not OK with me, no matter who we dispatch as an enemy. Lets do it legally, or one of us could be next.... remember Janet Napolitano thought US veterans are possible terrorists.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KbwiMJ74Bw]Department of Homeland Security Calls Military Veterans "terrorist!" - YouTube[/ame]
We target American citizens with sucky intelligence. We claim that we know enough about them to justify depriving them of their lives without due process. This case proves in no uncertain terms that we do not know enough to skirt the constitution in the way we have done.
Exactly.... Im glad they are dead, but the way it was done stinks.
Why is everyone OK with the POTUS killing with no impunity
How would you suggest we handle this? we can't exactly roll up in Yemen in a black and white and slap the cuffs on those boys.