Germany to Ban “Hate Speech Against Muslims” on Social Media

Germany is doing the right thing........ :thup:





Are they indeed, you do realise that one stroke of the pen and you muslims could face total censure on any media making your racist attacks completely illegal. What will you do then when your posts on here are taken down for hate attacks ?
 
America is best outside Sweden. Why not with new president nuke Serbia ?? Belgrad is finished.
 
Germany is doing the right thing........ :thup:

good point------they should monitor mosques for those weekly Khutbah jumaat feces
flings

hey you guys started this, jail time for denying the events of the holocaust, and every word spoke about Jews, true or not was anti Semitism. How does it feel.





A pity that the US doesn't do the same thing, I wonder how long before you pack up and go if they did. If the words were true and the intent was to report and educate then it is not anti Semitism. But if the words were false or intended to incite racial, religious or cultural hatred then they are anti Semitism. I know it is hard for you American pinko liberals to understand this being covered by so many amendments to your bill of rights, but that is how it is in the real world.

So how does it feel to be viewed as a racist Nazi POS by the rest of the world once shown how you cry when you get called out for your racism
 
Germany is doing the right thing........ :thup:

good point------they should monitor mosques for those weekly Khutbah jumaat feces
flings

hey you guys started this, jail time for denying the events of the holocaust, and every word spoke about Jews, true or not was anti Semitism. How does it feel.

who are "you guys" in your post, penny dear?--------I am not sure but I think it was
Austria that introduced the laws against holocaust denial. Are the "you guys"
Austrians? It might interest you to know that I have some Austrian ancestry

You know who, Zionist. Oh not it was Zionist , you keep blaming everyone else. I changed my mind, one should be able to be truthful , but the Pam Geller groups are banned as they should be.





Your truth and the real truth are poles apart and have no relationship what so ever. To you unsubstantiated blood libels are the truth and anything else is Zionist lies, all because you are a POS muslim convert that hates the world and wants to destroy all that is good in it.
 
You gotta be kidding me!!! Well, Facebook seems to be going along but no reaction yet from Google and Twitter. What bothers me is when will Obama's “anti-radical czar” try to do the same thing here?

Read the story @ Germany springs to action over hate speech against migrants

And it seem that Twitter is now going to give you 1,000 characters to do it in.

This has been a building movement over the years. As a matter of fact I was just reading an article last night by Barbara Kay of the National Post about this movement in Quebec to criminalize any speech that is derogatory to Islam in Quebec..

What was fascinating was this tidbit on how Hillary Clinton under Obama has been coordinating with other countries to move forward with criminalizing speech.

Hillary sponsored the first Istanbul Conference to deal with enacting speech restrictive laws against slandering ISLAM world wide with the exception of the US of course because of the Constitution.I didn't know that.

Very disturbing.Happened in 2011 with Obama's full support.

Here's just part of the movement she and Obama have been involved in. A crime to slander Islam. It's out there and now Quebec is looking at passing a law on this.

Here's a bit of the article. It's worth the whole read.

"The Cairo Declaration asserts the superiority of Islam and defines freedom of speech according to Shariah law, which considers any criticism of Muhammad blasphemy. (Former French screen star and animal-rights activist Brigitte Bardot, for example, who has criticized Islam, mostly for its use of animal sacrifices, has been prosecuted and fined four times for “inciting racial hatred.”)

Clinton could not assent to enacting speech-restrictive laws in the U.S. — that pesky constitution!

Frémont’s fascination with the OIC is hardly unique in North America. In spite of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is supposed to protect Americans from speech-chilling laws like Bill 59 and the Cairo Declaration, one of the OIC’s biggest fans is the U.S. State Department. Hillary Clinton enthusiastically sponsored the first Istanbul conference in 2011, which included delegates from the U.S., the EU and the OIC, but was largely conducted behind closed doors and attracted little attention.

Clinton could not assent to enacting speech-restrictive laws in the U.S. — that pesky constitution! — but she did assert that the U.S. could advocate for other messages to achieve the same result, such as the use of “good old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming.” On this file, she and her president march in lockstep.

US President Barack Obama famously announced in 2012 that the "future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam".

Well, if the future does not belong to those who have the right to say anything they want about the prophet of Islam, just as the past has belonged to those with the right to say anything they want about Moses, Christ, Marx and the Buddha; and if “slander” of Islam is to be defined by the OIC and suppressed by shaming or worse — then to whom exactly do Jacques Frémont, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama intend for the future to belong?"

Barbara Kay: Appeasing the Islamists in Quebec





Not that long ago the Islamic enclave at the UN demanded that the UN enact a law making it illegal to say anything bad about islam or the muslims, even if it was true. And that the punishment was to be execution in an Islamic state. Of course the UN laughed at the proposal and told the muslims to get an education. The same thing was tried in the UK with the same result, and muslims went away with their tale between their legs. Not long after IS was formed and now we are being invaded by millions of extremist muslims. It does not take a genius to work this out.
 
This after a mayor telling the women they should just get used to rape by muslims.. lol ok

Henriette Reker another Traitor bitch, she got stabbed in the neck whilst campaigning for the office that she has forefeited the right to hold.

She needs to be forced to resign, ditto the Cologne police chief and of course the ENTIRE German Government....ALL volksverräter....hopefully within the year there will be the Revolution and then a Volksgerichtshof to put these Traitors in the dock.

Wasn't the stabbing by an anti Muslim activist?






What next that he was mossad or hasbarra and in the pay of other Zionists.
 
Would someone please answer the question.

Who gets to describe what "hate speech" is? :bang3::bang3:





The world that already has such laws, and the rules are simple. No spoken word that is untrue or would cause harm to another person. No words that could incite hatred or abuse of another unless they are proven to be factual. This was shown to be the case with the film "Fitna" that was based entirely on the koran and hadiths so was deemed free speech.
 
Would someone please answer the question.

Who gets to describe what "hate speech" is? :bang3::bang3:





The world that already has such laws, and the rules are simple. No spoken word that is untrue or would cause harm to another person. No words that could incite hatred or abuse of another unless they are proven to be factual. This was shown to be the case with the film "Fitna" that was based entirely on the koran and hadiths so was deemed free speech.

In other words, anything one says about Islam based upon FACTS is acceptable!
 
Police are searching for a fourth suspect believed to be the man’s 15-year-old brother. None of those involved have been named under German privacy laws.

The suspects are not asylum-seekers. The 21-year-old man and his brother are long-term German residents, while the two 14-year-olds live in Switzerland and the Netherlands.


Prosecutors say they do not believe the incident is connected to the outbreak of sexual assaults against women in Cologne and other German cities over the New Year.

In addition to the more than 120 criminal complaints filed in Cologne, there have been reports of attacks on women across the country.

More than 50 criminal complaints have been filed by women in the northern city of Hamburg, 39 of them for sexual assault.

Two teenage girls gang-raped by four 'Syrian nationals' in southern Germany

says here long term German residents.

It doesn't matter that the Syrians are not asylum seekers, it doesn't matter that they've lived in Germany and the others in the Netherlands and Switzerland. What matters is that, none of them are European they're Syrian and Muslim savages, as non-Europeans, they do NOT belong on our Continent in the first place.

All of them, deport them back to Syria and if they get blown-up there, who gives a crap.

I think they want to go back, its too bad their country is destroyed. Are you saying only Germans should live in Germany??

I don't give a crap about their country.

I'm saying that only Europeans should essentially live in Europa, this means ANY European can live in Germany or any other European nation, we are a European family of European peoples.

I have no problem with Australians, New Zealanders, Argentines, Chileans, Chinese, Japanese or North Americans including Canadians in that, no problem with any of these nationalities living in Europe. These nationalities do not in general cause harm and chaos, and they work, they're not welfare queens and with the exception of the Chinese and Japanese, the others will almost certainly be of European ancestry.

The Muslims and those of black African ancestry, no, they don't belong on our Continent and never have and they need to be deported, IF ANY were born in Europe, doesn't matter, they're NOT European, they need to be deported back to the lands of their ancestry.

Wow...that sounds like you really are channeling Nazi racist propoganda. So a black European, who has lived there for many generations - should be deported?
 
Would someone please answer the question.

Who gets to describe what "hate speech" is? :bang3::bang3:





The world that already has such laws, and the rules are simple. No spoken word that is untrue or would cause harm to another person. No words that could incite hatred or abuse of another unless they are proven to be factual. This was shown to be the case with the film "Fitna" that was based entirely on the koran and hadiths so was deemed free speech.

In other words, anything one says about Islam based upon FACTS is acceptable!





Correct, and the same goes for Christianity and Judaism. As long as it is not done to incite hatred or intolerance, or to cause harm to another.
 

Forum List

Back
Top