Gaza man killed by Israeli artillery near Khan Younis, another injured

SherriMunnerlyn

VIP Member
Jun 11, 2012
12,201
265
83
Gaza man killed by Israeli artillery near Khan Younis, another injured

GAZA CITY (Ma'an) -- A young man was killed and another wounded late Thursday in an Israeli artillery shelling east of Khan Yunis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip, a Ma'an reporter said.Medics said a 22-year-old man died and another was injured after the two were targeted by Israeli forces in the Absan area east of Khan Younis.

Gaza man killed by Israeli artillery near Khan Younis, another injured | Maan News Agency

Targeted assassinations are unlawful under intl law and war crimes.

Israel makes a practice of embracing this terroristic practice.

We can only hope one day the Israeli war criminals responsible for these crimes will be tried for their crimes at The Hague.
 
Gaza man killed by Israeli artillery near Khan Younis, another injured

GAZA CITY (Ma'an) -- A young man was killed and another wounded late Thursday in an Israeli artillery shelling east of Khan Yunis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip, a Ma'an reporter said.Medics said a 22-year-old man died and another was injured after the two were targeted by Israeli forces in the Absan area east of Khan Younis.

Gaza man killed by Israeli artillery near Khan Younis, another injured | Maan News Agency

Targeted assassinations are unlawful under intl law and war crimes.

Israel makes a practice of embracing this terroristic practice.

We can only hope one day the Israeli war criminals responsible for these crimes will be tried for their crimes at The Hague.

First, though - we can hope that the lyin' l'il sherrithing will learn to comprehend what she reads.

There isn't any evidence given that these two were 'targeted' by Israeli forces. Nor is artillery fire a reasonable choice for a 'targeted assassination'.

So it appears that the vile sherriKKKins has little or no ablity to understand ANYTHING in that slop from 'Ma'an' above. Or else it's even more dishonest than previously suspected..........
 
The Israeli Policy of Extrajudicial Assassinations and International Law

From the above survey of the potentially applicable law – self-defence, IHL and international human rights law – one can conclude that the practice of targeted assassinations conducted by Israel violates many of the rules of international law. Article 51 of the Charter does not, according to the ICJ, have any relevance in the context of the OPT and does not apply to the targeting of political leaders involved in Palestinian resistance movements. Moreover those assassinated cannot be proven to have taken a "direct participation in hostilities", in accordance with the latest interpretation of this notion by the ICRC, so that IHL should apply to them only insofar as they are protected persons. International human rights law which is acknowledged to apply in time of armed conflict, particularly its non-derogable right to life, appears to be the most protective regime. Clearly by all the conditions set under human rights law, the policy of targeted assassinations by Israel cannot fail to be seen as an arbitrary deprivation of life of both targeted persons and innocent bystanders.As Professor John Dugard has stated so eloquently32:As Professor John Dugard has stated so eloquently32:Israel's freely acknowledged practice of selected assassination or targeted killings of Palestinian activists cannot be reconciled with provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention, such as articles 27 and 32, which seek to protect the lives of protected persons not taking a direct part in hostilities. They also violate human rights norms that affirm the right to life and the prohibition on execution of civilians without trial and a fair judicial process. There is no basis for killing protected persons on the basis of suspicion that they have engaged or will engage in terroristic activities. In addition, many civilians not suspected of any unlawful activity have been killed in these targeted killings, in the bombing of villages or in gunfire exchanges, in circumstances indicating an indiscriminate and disproportionate use of force

Al-Zaytouna Centre - The Israeli Policy of Extrajudicial Assassinations and International Law
 
The article in the OP alleges this was a targeted killing.

Ofcourse it was targeted. That is what you do when an enemy targets you with mortor fire. You target them with your own mortor fire, artillery, air strike, whatever. The idea is to destroy and silence the mortor fire being launched against your own forces. It's called warfare.
 
Hebron boy drowns in washing machine | Maan News Agency

"HEBRON (Ma'an) -- A baby boy from Hebron in the southern West Bank died Thursday after he fell into a washing machine in his family home.

A family member told Ma'an that 4-year-old Nimir Jalal Najjar fell into the washing machine while his mother was busy hanging laundry.

When the mother came back, she found that the boy had drowned."

Ma'an's journalistic standards - or at least that of their English proofreaders! - are not up to snuff, it seems........
 
The article in the OP alleges this was a targeted killing.

Ofcourse it was targeted. That is what you do when an enemy targets you with mortor fire. You target them with your own mortor fire, artillery, air strike, whatever. The idea is to destroy and silence the mortor fire being launched against your own forces. It's called warfare.

Specific named individuals being targeted to kill is not the same as two being injured in an altercation after Israel trespassed Iinto Gaza.

The two articles report two different stories of what happened.
 
Another desperate attempt to demonize Israel and claim vicitmhood for terrorists.
 
Another desperate attempt to demonize Israel and claim vicitmhood for terrorists.

The issue is Israels unlawful targeted killings practice, I want to see the Israeli war criminals brought to justice.
 
The article in the OP alleges this was a targeted killing.

Ofcourse it was targeted. That is what you do when an enemy targets you with mortor fire. You target them with your own mortor fire, artillery, air strike, whatever. The idea is to destroy and silence the mortor fire being launched against your own forces. It's called warfare.

Specific named individuals being targeted to kill is not the same as two being injured in an altercation after Israel trespassed Iinto Gaza.

The two articles report two different stories of what happened.

Trespassing? They had every right to "trespass". They found a tunnel that went under the border and emptied out into Israel. The tunnel diggers were the ones that were trespassing. The Israel's entered the area to destroy the tunnel. Some fools decided to throw some mortors (altercation?) and the Israel's responded with a boom. Silly bastards tried to fight a tank backed up with artillery with a mortor. They got what they deserved.
Targeted killing, why not. When some militant vows to make a terror attack and kill you and yours you have an obligation and duty to take the asshole out.
There is no reason why Gaza can not be a jewel on the Mediterranian with luxury hotels, fine restaurants and be a place of peace and prosperity. Well there is one reason, they have a bunch of thugs and gangsters with hate filled hearts that have made a living off of being terrorist. They control the populace with violence and thuggery. Get rid of them and Gaza could become a nice place.
 
Ofcourse it was targeted. That is what you do when an enemy targets you with mortor fire. You target them with your own mortor fire, artillery, air strike, whatever. The idea is to destroy and silence the mortor fire being launched against your own forces. It's called warfare.

Specific named individuals being targeted to kill is not the same as two being injured in an altercation after Israel trespassed Iinto Gaza.

The two articles report two different stories of what happened.

Trespassing? They had every right to "trespass". They found a tunnel that went under the border and emptied out into Israel. The tunnel diggers were the ones that were trespassing. The Israel's entered the area to destroy the tunnel. Some fools decided to throw some mortors (altercation?) and the Israel's responded with a boom. Silly bastards tried to fight a tank backed up with artillery with a mortor. They got what they deserved.
Targeted killing, why not. When some militant vows to make a terror attack and kill you and yours you have an obligation and duty to take the asshole out.
There is no reason why Gaza can not be a jewel on the Mediterranian with luxury hotels, fine restaurants and be a place of peace and prosperity. Well there is one reason, they have a bunch of thugs and gangsters with hate filled hearts that have made a living off of being terrorist. They control the populace with violence and thuggery. Get rid of them and Gaza could become a nice place.

The tunnel was found a long time ago, no justification for trespasses or targeted killings.
 
Specific named individuals being targeted to kill is not the same as two being injured in an altercation after Israel trespassed Iinto Gaza.

The two articles report two different stories of what happened.

Trespassing? They had every right to "trespass". They found a tunnel that went under the border and emptied out into Israel. The tunnel diggers were the ones that were trespassing. The Israel's entered the area to destroy the tunnel. Some fools decided to throw some mortors (altercation?) and the Israel's responded with a boom. Silly bastards tried to fight a tank backed up with artillery with a mortor. They got what they deserved.
Targeted killing, why not. When some militant vows to make a terror attack and kill you and yours you have an obligation and duty to take the asshole out.
There is no reason why Gaza can not be a jewel on the Mediterranian with luxury hotels, fine restaurants and be a place of peace and prosperity. Well there is one reason, they have a bunch of thugs and gangsters with hate filled hearts that have made a living off of being terrorist. They control the populace with violence and thuggery. Get rid of them and Gaza could become a nice place.

The tunnel was found a long time ago, no justification for trespasses or targeted killings.

Did the authorities in Gaza call Israel and say "listen, you know that tunnel you guys discovered, well we are going to destroy it tomorrow". No, they didn't. They let it sit there and linger so it could be used again. Anyhow, when your enemy is using a place for some kind of sanction or hiding place, you have the right to go find him and kill him. If people don't like the rules they shouldn't be terrorist or involved with terrorist.
 

It continues the thread I opened yesterday night about an unusual event near Gaza strip.

The IDF attack on the Palestinians was provoked. Palestinians attacked injuring 5 of our men, one critically injured.

So sorry if I don't share Sherri's vision about how 'criminalic' this attack was.

A proper response to the Palestinian unprovoked action, is more like it
 

It continues the thread I opened yesterday night about an unusual event near Gaza strip.

The IDF attack on the Palestinians was provoked. Palestinians attacked injuring 5 of our men, one critically injured.

So sorry if I don't share Sherri's vision about how 'criminalic' this attack was.

A proper response to the Palestinian unprovoked action, is more like it



Lipush you face an impossible task-----you are addressing two
ISA RESPECTERS of the feminine gender------Isa respecters have ---
WITH SELF RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION and THE HOLY ENDORSEMENT
OF THEIR "god" murdered in the hundreds of millions-----in fact----
based on libels The females of the creed, thereby, release their
LIBIDINAL ENERGIES at the thought of and the sight of the
murders comitted by their "men" and the obscene mutilations inflicted
on the victims. You cannot stem the force of nature--------freud knew
that-------he was a brilliant neurologist-------he uncovered the secrets of
the MIND------including the depraved mind
 

It continues the thread I opened yesterday night about an unusual event near Gaza strip.

The IDF attack on the Palestinians was provoked. Palestinians attacked injuring 5 of our men, one critically injured.

So sorry if I don't share Sherri's vision about how 'criminalic' this attack was.

A proper response to the Palestinian unprovoked action, is more like it

Noone but Zionists believe the Zionist version of events.

Unless this incident and another that followed it and resulted in more Israeli killing is investigated by human rights groups or the UN what really happened will likely never be fully disclosed.

Since it appears no civilians were killed, there may be no investigating of these incidents.
 

It continues the thread I opened yesterday night about an unusual event near Gaza strip.

The IDF attack on the Palestinians was provoked. Palestinians attacked injuring 5 of our men, one critically injured.

So sorry if I don't share Sherri's vision about how 'criminalic' this attack was.

A proper response to the Palestinian unprovoked action, is more like it

Noone but Zionists believe the Zionist version of events.

Unless this incident and another that followed it and resulted in more Israeli killing is investigated by human rights groups or the UN what really happened will likely never be fully disclosed.

Since it appears no civilians were killed, there may be no investigating of these incidents.

Shame.

But then again, are you interested in investigating those incidents? It seems like the only thing you're looking for is blaming Israel, even though it is more than obvious than the attack was initiated by the Palestinian aggression.
 
Photo from the Hamas terrorist's funeral

733903_712710488757556_1436641669_n.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top