Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
As if I need your permission to post. Nice dodge.If you wish to argue that I'm fine with that.
No you arent. You dont know what subsidized meansBullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare
sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....No you arent. You dont know what subsidized meansBullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare
subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]
VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)
You are welcome
- support (an organization or activity) financially.
"it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
synonyms:
give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
[more]
- pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.
False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....No you arent. You dont know what subsidized meansBullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare
subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]
VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)
You are welcome
- support (an organization or activity) financially.
"it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
synonyms:
give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
[more]
- pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.
Adorable...
No, you don't believe in free markets -- well, you probably do because most folks like you believe in fairy tales....I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....No you arent. You dont know what subsidized meansBullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare
subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]
VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)
You are welcome
- support (an organization or activity) financially.
"it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
synonyms:
give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
[more]
- pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.
Adorable...
AGAIN, you make shit up and pat yourself on the back.
Around here we call that being dishonest.
not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
I know they dont. Neither does Capitalism.No, you don't believe in free markets -- well, you probably do because most folks like you believe in fairy tales....I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....No you arent. You dont know what subsidized meansBullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare
subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]
VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)
You are welcome
- support (an organization or activity) financially.
"it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
synonyms:
give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
[more]
- pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.
Adorable...
AGAIN, you make shit up and pat yourself on the back.
Around here we call that being dishonest.
Free markets do not exist......as you so gleefully demonstrated
This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
youre confusing free market with government controlled capitalism,,,not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
Sure they have. You're an idiot if you think otherwise. Here's an article from Forbes dated 2017:
How Many Rules And Regulations Do Federal Agencies Issue?
There are more documented and undocumented federal rules and regulations than most people realize. Fixing it all will take hard-to-come-by bipartisanship.www.forbes.com
And here's the government website which shows applicable business laws:
ttps://www.usa.gov/laws-and-regulations
none of those have ever been an issue,, I worked in the free market not the government controlled one,,Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
Did OSHA laws go extinct 30 yrs ago??
Are you saying you don't have to pay employees overtime anymore??
Wow....that's news......give us the link
he doesn't care about people working.You sound pleased that the project failedThis is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
see, demofks have no clue how a private business works. They don't get that the more employees working means more tax revenue to the local and federal governments. They just don't get that at all. not subsidizing a civilian with welfare, and instead having that individual working and paying taxes is the conservative objective. Will always be the objective. If the demofks would get the fk out of the way, we'd have many more thousands of tax payers. But alas, they haven't a clue in the entire world.none of those have ever been an issue,, I worked in the free market not the government controlled one,,Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??not in 30 yrs they havent,,False.....the state does tell you how to do business....sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??who are you to tell a state how to do business???in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?
When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?
in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,
The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.
if they breached that the state should sue them,,
They should never do these kinds of contracts.
sounds fascist to me,,,
Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!
Did OSHA laws go extinct 30 yrs ago??
Are you saying you don't have to pay employees overtime anymore??
Wow....that's news......give us the link