Foxconn. OK, we lied.

[Crepitus]

It's adorable watching so-called "free market" conservatives whine about how governments should totally cater to the whims of corporations......because Ayn Rand something something, freedom

FREEDUMB!

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

 

[Orangecat]

If you wish to argue that I'm fine with that.

As if I need your permission to post. Nice dodge.

 

[TNHarley]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??

Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare

You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?

These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??

Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.

Bullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.

No you arent. You dont know what subsidized means

subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]

VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)

1. support (an organization or activity) financially.
   "it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
   synonyms:
   give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
   [more]
   • pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.

You are welcome

 

[progressive hunter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??

Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare

You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?

These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??

Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.

Bullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.

No you arent. You dont know what subsidized means

subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]

VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)

1. support (an organization or activity) financially.
   "it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
   synonyms:
   give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
   [more]
   • pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.

You are welcome

I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....

Adorable...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

 

[TNHarley]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??

Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare

You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?

These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??

Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.

Bullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.

No you arent. You dont know what subsidized means

subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]

VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)

1. support (an organization or activity) financially.
   "it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
   synonyms:
   give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
   [more]
   • pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.

You are welcome

I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....

Adorable...

I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.
AGAIN, you make shit up and pat yourself on the back.
Around here we call that being dishonest.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??

Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare

You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?

These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??

Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.

Bullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.

No you arent. You dont know what subsidized means

subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]

VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)

1. support (an organization or activity) financially.
   "it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
   synonyms:
   give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
   [more]
   • pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.

You are welcome

I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....

Adorable...

I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.
AGAIN, you make shit up and pat yourself on the back.
Around here we call that being dishonest.

No, you don't believe in free markets -- well, you probably do because most folks like you believe in fairy tales....

Free markets do not exist......as you so gleefully demonstrated

 

[pknopp]

If you wish to argue that I'm fine with that.

As if I need your permission to post. Nice dodge.

Rant away.

 

[progressive hunter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

 

[TNHarley]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

So you are saying that a company receiving tax subsidies from state and federal governments isn't the same as them receiving tax payer money??

Then how come all of the whining about state and federal government subsidizing stuff like Medicaid?? I have heard that referred to many times as people getting taxpayer money for free healthcare

You are comparing tax breaks to medicaid subsidizing?

These businesses are also being subsidized...you do understand that right??

Keeping more of your money isnt being subsidized, you ridiculous dumbfuck.

Bullshit!!! When you're avoiding taxes everyone else pays you're being subsidized.

No you arent. You dont know what subsidized means

subsidize
[ˈsəbsəˌdīz]

VERB
subsidized (past tense) · subsidized (past participle)

1. support (an organization or activity) financially.
   "it was beyond the power of a state to subsidize a business"
   synonyms:
   give money to · pay a subsidy to · give a grant to · contribute to · make a contribution to · invest in · sponsor · fund · finance · provide finance/capital for · capitalize ·
   [more]
   • pay part of the cost of producing (something) to reduce prices for the buyer.

You are welcome

I thought you folks believed in free markets -- not government picking winners and losers....

Adorable...

I do believe in free markets. I didnt even imply I didnt. All i did was say letting people keep their money isnt being subsidized.
AGAIN, you make shit up and pat yourself on the back.
Around here we call that being dishonest.

No, you don't believe in free markets -- well, you probably do because most folks like you believe in fairy tales....

Free markets do not exist......as you so gleefully demonstrated

I know they dont. Neither does Capitalism.
I still support them as I am a progressive liberal.
But i am glad you know what i believe better than me.
Stupid ass

 

[Dragonlady]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

Donnie Deutsch was on MSNBC the other morning railing against AOC driving Amazon out of New York. He kept talking about how "transformative" that investment would have been to that whole area, and she drove all of that "transformative change" out of the City. Well of course she did, and she was right in doing so!

AOC wasn't working on behalf of Amazon, and one man's "transformation" is an entire neighborhood's destruction. The neighborhood whose voters elected her to act on THEIR behalf, to protect their neighbourhood - one of the last affordable working class neighbourhoods in New York.

Many would be displaced from their homes by "eminant domain" to complete the land assembly necessary for the construction of the headquarters. All would see their property taxes rise dramatically to pay for the $9 billion in tax breaks to pay for the additional roadways, subways, public transit corridors, and other infrastructure the City of New York promised to provide Amazon for free, to locate in that District.

These people already have jobs. They're not going to be working for Amazon. But the "transformative" arrival of New York will destroy the homes and the lives of all of the people who voted for AOC. She would have been derelict in her duty to represent her constituents to do anything other than help them defend their homes and their way of life.

And a pox on people like Donny Deutsch, and his private helicopter, who think that preserving neighbourhoods for WORKING AMERICANS, was the "wrong" thing to do.

 

[Dragonlady]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

Sure they have. You're an idiot if you think otherwise. Here's an article from Forbes dated 2017:

How Many Rules And Regulations Do Federal Agencies Issue?

There are more documented and undocumented federal rules and regulations than most people realize. Fixing it all will take hard-to-come-by bipartisanship.

www.forbes.com

And here's the government website which shows applicable business laws:

Stay legally compliant | U.S. Small Business Administration

www.sba.gov

ttps://www.usa.gov/laws-and-regulations

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??

Did OSHA laws go extinct 30 yrs ago??

Are you saying you don't have to pay employees overtime anymore??

Wow....that's news......give us the link

 

[progressive hunter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

Sure they have. You're an idiot if you think otherwise. Here's an article from Forbes dated 2017:

How Many Rules And Regulations Do Federal Agencies Issue?

There are more documented and undocumented federal rules and regulations than most people realize. Fixing it all will take hard-to-come-by bipartisanship.

www.forbes.com

And here's the government website which shows applicable business laws:

Stay legally compliant | U.S. Small Business Administration

www.sba.gov

ttps://www.usa.gov/laws-and-regulations

youre confusing free market with government controlled capitalism,,,

other than 2 yrs where I did an LLC they have never told me how to run my business,,

 

[progressive hunter]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??

Did OSHA laws go extinct 30 yrs ago??

Are you saying you don't have to pay employees overtime anymore??

Wow....that's news......give us the link

none of those have ever been an issue,, I worked in the free market not the government controlled one,,

 

[jc456]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

You sound pleased that the project failed

he doesn't care about people working.

 

[surada]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

Trump was very proud of Foxconn. He bragged that it was a return of manufacturing to the US.

 

[jc456]

This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.

Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin

This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.

If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.

It was about tax breaks. Not receiving tax payer funds.

Who do you think makes up for the missing revenue? The tooth fairy?

thats on the government to cut spending not bill someone else,,

So when the business wants an exit ramp to their business the state should say "build it yourself"?

When the roads need upkeep the state should exclude the companies trucks from using those roads because they were exempt from paying the taxes used to pay for that upkeep?

those are for the workers that pay taxs,, but youre right the government shouldnt be helping the people get to their jobs so they can pay taxs,,

in this case the end result is no jobs and no taxs,, good job government,,

The business was built. They just didn't live up to their promises.

in business there are no promises,, just whats in the contract,,

if they breached that the state should sue them,,

They should never do these kinds of contracts.

who are you to tell a state how to do business???

sounds fascist to me,,,

Faux'servatives: Who are you to tell the state how to do business??


Also faux'servatives: Who is the state to tell me how to do business!!!!

sorry buckwheat but I aint no conservative,, and the state doesnt tell me how to do business unless I decide to sign a contract with them,,

False.....the state does tell you how to do business....

not in 30 yrs they havent,,

Did the Civil Rights act stop existing 30 yrs ago??

Did OSHA laws go extinct 30 yrs ago??

Are you saying you don't have to pay employees overtime anymore??

Wow....that's news......give us the link

none of those have ever been an issue,, I worked in the free market not the government controlled one,,

see, demofks have no clue how a private business works. They don't get that the more employees working means more tax revenue to the local and federal governments. They just don't get that at all. not subsidizing a civilian with welfare, and instead having that individual working and paying taxes is the conservative objective. Will always be the objective. If the demofks would get the fk out of the way, we'd have many more thousands of tax payers. But alas, they haven't a clue in the entire world.