For Gingrich, times have changed...

[Dot Com]

newt= hypocrisy on parade

 

[theHawk]

Has Gingrich put out a plan that will balance the budget? More importantly, has he put a plan that has any reasonable chance of being implemented that will balance the budget?

I have more faith that Newt would at least attempt to balance the budget and cut spending, than the asshole in office now that would never even dream of it.

Well, you can start by pinning your hopes on this:

Gingrich Tax Plan Would Add $1.3 Trillion to Deficit, Study Says - Bloomberg

Any study that claims tax cuts would "increase the deficit" is complete bullshit. As long as we cut spending, we can reduce the deficit. You libs get hung up on what the tax rate percentage is, rather than looking at revenue in versus spending.

The more you raise taxes, the more it will kill growth, and encourage people to move their businesses and money overseas. Lower tax will have the opposite effect.

20% of trillions is a hell of a lot more than 90% of nothing.

 

[Synthaholic]

America will never put a known adultress in the White House as First Lady.

Bull shit... they put an unknown community organizer with zero experience and no documentation as to where he came from or who he is with a name like a terrorist in the White House. After that, the threshold for who can be elected President got thrown clear into the fucking gutter.

Gingrich would actually be a cut above the shit stain and his radical cabinet full of marxists and commies we have now.

You scumbags are going to have four more years of President Barack Obama!

Why don't you move?

 

[Synthaholic]

is it any different than him leading the campaign against clinton while bonnking calista?

Not quite as bad as Clinton Getting a blow job while on the phone with Yasser Arafat..Go figure. This from you who defended that slime Wiener continually

So if you think that Gingrich is the moral equivalent of Clinton and Weiner,

why are YOU defending him?

He has an (R) next to his name.

 

[Dot Com]

America will never put a known adultress in the White House as First Lady.

Bull shit... they put an unknown community organizer with zero experience and no documentation as to where he came from or who he is with a name like a terrorist in the White House. After that, the threshold for who can be elected President got thrown clear into the fucking gutter.

Gingrich would actually be a cut above the shit stain and his radical cabinet full of marxists and commies we have now.

You scumbags are going to have four more years of President Barack Obama!

Why don't you move?

Pale Rider must have a closet-full of right wing, kool aid at his house

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's fascinating to see that Conservatives have embraced what they once ridiculed as the 'liberal' attitude toward the sex lives of politicians.

Yea, sorry we're not living up to your stereotype.

Serial hypocrites is the conservative 'stereotype' you're living up to.

 

[Big Black Dog]

So, I guess if a person has made mistakes in the past, there is no hope for them in the future... If this is true, let's get a bucket of rocks and go stone him. Whoever is without sin can cast the first stone.

 

[bripat9643]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

 

[Mr Natural]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

That's because Romney is not nearly the arrogant, hypocritical douchebag that Gingrich is.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I have more faith that Newt would at least attempt to balance the budget and cut spending, than the asshole in office now that would never even dream of it.

Well, you can start by pinning your hopes on this:

Gingrich Tax Plan Would Add $1.3 Trillion to Deficit, Study Says - Bloomberg

Any study that claims tax cuts would "increase the deficit" is complete bullshit. As long as we cut spending, we can reduce the deficit. You libs get hung up on what the tax rate percentage is, rather than looking at revenue in versus spending.

The more you raise taxes, the more it will kill growth, and encourage people to move their businesses and money overseas. Lower tax will have the opposite effect.

20% of trillions is a hell of a lot more than 90% of nothing.

Kind of makes Gingrich sound pretty foolish then, making a key component of his resume that he balanced the budget in the 90's, when he was in Congress,

that being in the years following the Clinton tax increase.

Eh???????

 

[NYcarbineer]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

Liberals are pleased because Gingrich's chances of beating Obama are far less than Romney's.

And Gingrich is an even bigger douche than Romney (as high as Romney may have set the douche bar)

...so it's more fun attacking Newt.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

That's because Romney is not nearly the arrogant, hypocritical douchebag that Gingrich is.

I made my post below not having read yours...

 

[bripat9643]

It's fascinating to see that Conservatives have embraced what they once ridiculed as the 'liberal' attitude toward the sex lives of politicians.

Yea, sorry we're not living up to your stereotype.

Serial hypocrites is the conservative 'stereotype' you're living up to.

"Serial hypocrite" is not a stereotype of a liberal. It's a description.

 

[Jarhead]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

not sure Gingrich is more electable than Romney.....but Gingrich will have a field day against Obama in the deabtes. How the media will paint them, however, may make things difficult for Gingrich.
Romney, at best, will have an equal debate with Obama.

 

[bripat9643]

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

That's because Romney is not nearly the arrogant, hypocritical douchebag that Gingrich is.

In other words, you aren't afraid of Romney. You are afraid of Newt.

 

[Mr Natural]

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

That's because Romney is not nearly the arrogant, hypocritical douchebag that Gingrich is.

In other words, you aren't afraid of Romney. You are afraid of Newt.

I'm not afraid of either of them because neither have a snowball's chance in hell of beating Obama.

 

[Synthaholic]

So, I guess if a person has made mistakes in the past, there is no hope for them in the future... If this is true, let's get a bucket of rocks and go stone him. Whoever is without sin can cast the first stone.

Re-Elect Anthony Weiner!

Is that what you're saying?

 

[Synthaholic]

Interestingly, it appears that both conservatives AND liberals seem quite pleased that Gingrich apparently got a nice boost from his 'smackdown' of John King last night.

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

Liberals are pleased because Gingrich's chances of beating Obama are far less than Romney's.

And Gingrich is an even bigger douche than Romney (as high as Romney may have set the douche bar)

...so it's more fun attacking Newt.

It's just amazing that some think Gingrich could win!

Talk about willful ignorance.

 

[Jarhead]

If liberals are so pleased about it, why are they attacking them so viciously? You can always tell who liberals fear by watching who they attack the most. You don't see them attacking Romney nearly has strongly as they attack Gingrich.

Liberals are pleased because Gingrich's chances of beating Obama are far less than Romney's.

And Gingrich is an even bigger douche than Romney (as high as Romney may have set the douche bar)

...so it's more fun attacking Newt.

It's just amazing that some think Gingrich could win!

Talk about willful ignorance.

Actually.....many of us see it that Obama can lose....not so much that Newt can win.

 

[Katzndogz]

It certainly has made up my mind. I won't marry Newt Gingrich.

I'll vote for him however.

Democrats are insane because the plan to ruin him with unproven accusations has backfired. He has picked up a lot of steam since the ex-wife interview. Particularly with women.

Do democrats not understand women? Or just men that don't understand women?

Women LOVE to turn on other women. All that had to happen for this to blow up in the liberal face is that Marianne Gingrich not appear sympathetic, to come across as petty or vindictive. To make women go with their natural proclivitiy of saying "You BITCH" first! Democrats were utterly stupid. They should never have had Marianne Gingrich give this interview. Hire Gloria Allred who knows how to gin up sympathy. Allred would have had the ex-Mrs. on the floor collapsed in a puddle of tears.