Flashback-Rangel introduces bill to reinstate draft

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Stephanie, Nov 5, 2006.

  1. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,359
    Go out and vote Tuesday......vote REPUBLICAN....or we will get more of THIS........:)

    Rumsfeld says he sees no need for military draft
    Wednesday, January 8, 2003 Posted: 4:28 AM EST (0928 GMT)
    Rangel: 'For those who say the poor fight better, I say give the rich a chance.'

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rep. Charles Rangel introduced a bill in Congress Tuesday to reinstate the military draft, saying fighting forces should more closely reflect the economic makeup of the nation.

    The New York Democrat told reporters his goal is two-fold: to jolt Americans into realizing the import of a possible unilateral strike against Iraq, which he opposes, and "to make it clear that if there were a war, there would be more equitable representation of people making sacrifices."

    "I truly believe that those who make the decision and those who support the United States going into war would feel more readily the pain that's involved, the sacrifice that's involved, if they thought that the fighting force would include the affluent and those who historically have avoided this great responsibility," Rangel said.

    "Those who love this country have a patriotic obligation to defend this country," Rangel said. "For those who say the poor fight better, I say give the rich a chance."

    According to Rangel's office, minorities comprise more than 30 percent of the nation's military.

    Under his bill, the draft would apply to men and women ages 18 to 26; exemptions would be granted to allow people to graduate from high school, but college students would have to serve.

    Anyone who didn't qualify for military service because of impairments would be asked to perform community service.

    The lawmaker has said his measure could make members of Congress more reluctant to authorize military action. The Korean War veteran has accused President Bush and some fellow lawmakers of being too eager to go to war.

    Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told reporters Tuesday he sees no need for a draft. He said the military is managing to attract enough skilled recruits without one.

    "We're not going to re-implement a draft. There is no need for it at all," Rumsfeld said. "The disadvantages of using compulsion to bring into the armed forces the men and women needed are notable."

    Draft controversy
    The nation had a draft in place between 1948 and 1973. It grew to become the center of controversy during the Vietnam War, 1964-1975, an undeclared war that was the most unpopular conflict America has fought.

    Anger over the war led many young men to flee to Canada and elsewhere to avoid the draft, and violent protests were rampant. When the draft ended, the United States set up an all-volunteer military.

    Since 1980, the Selective Service has required men 18 to 26 to register to give the government a pool of men it could draw from in case troops were needed in an emergency.

    As of October 31, 14.1 million men would be eligible for a draft, said Selective Service spokesman Pat Schuback. Twenty-year-olds would be called up first, followed by others -- year by year. In the age group 20 to 26, 11 million would be eligible.

    The average number of men registered per year during the Vietnam War era was 18.4 million. That covers the period from July 1, 1964, through June 1973. http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/
     
  2. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    Rangel's a jackass and this is nothing short of murder by enemy soldiers. We don't need conscripts right now, and sending them out there to get killed anyway should be a crime, especially when the only reason you're doing it is to fight a class war. I equate this to paying a gang to move their turf wars to rich neighborhoods so that rich people can see what it's like to get killed in a drive-by.
     
  3. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    LOL, Politics, if the Dems do gain power on Tuesday this will come right off the table. They don't wanna draft.
     
  4. pegwinn
    Offline

    pegwinn Top of the Food Chain

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,549
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +329
    This was pure bluff and bluster on Rangels part. Later on (2005 or early 06)he said it was immoral for the Army to pay signing bonuses. If thirty percent of the service is minorities...... then that is actually a pretty good demographic. Look up the stats from Census 2000 and you will see that Blacks and Black combinations came to just at 25%. Since it is well known that the military is far more equal when it comes to opportunity, it would seem that the minorities joining wish to join another minority........ "successfull".
     

Share This Page