Fairness

[Steelplate]

non sequitur.How much addresses no issue
The question no one on you side is willing to answer is "who gets to decide".
That question none of you will touch.

Who gets to decide? How about a Democratic vote on the issue?

No... you don't want that... because you know that your side would lose handily.

Let me guess... Your side wants the richest to decide for everyone... No one gets tax breaks... but the rich. The rich get to play casino with investors' money... until they lose... then we as taxpayers have to pick up the tab... but hey... it's CAPITALISM... right?

Wrong... you are a fucking idiot who would rather cut off the legs of one man to support another who doesn't give a shit whether you live or die.... and your vote doesn't mean a damned thing to him.... these are the people YOU support.

 

[Care4all]

That's all I ever hear about from the liberals, we want fairness. So, what exactly is that and how do you achieve it in reality. Fairness based on outcomes? Everybody gets the same paycheck regardless of skill or effort? Or fairness based on equal opportunity? Kinda hard to guarantee that, I would think. Suppose somebody fucks off, do you subsidize him anyway? Step up and explain how the concept of fairness works for you.

i'll answer the first question:

it's a kindergartner's lesson on fairness but i think it sums it up, fairly well!

HOW TO BE
A FAIR PERSON



Treat people the way you want to be treated.

Take Turns.

Tell the truth.

Play by the rules.

Think about how your actions will affect others.

Listen to people with an open mind.

Don't blame others for your mistakes.

Don't take advantage of other people.

Don't play favorites.

Sounds great, but i don't think many liberals follow this concept of fairness. Maybe they think it, but they ain't doing it.

nahhhh Wise 'one'....that's just partisan mumbo jumbo....sure it can be fun to take sides of liberal vs conservative and duke it out with 'the defined enemy' kinda thing that many do on these message boards....

but in real life, most people are hard working, good people -rich and poor....on both sides of the aisle....just trying to figure out how to make life better, for their kids and for themselves....most eligible Americans don't even vote....probably couldn't even tell ya the name of the vice president or the president's cabinet members....

Yes, there are individuals on BOTH sides of the aisle, or on ''no aisle side'' at all, that may not practice the description of being fair that is taught in K-5.... but....

Honestly, i don't think unfair people, using the k 5 description of fair, are limited to ''a side of an aisle''....they are out there, as individuals, not in labeled or block groups, but as people....or rather, as a person.

care

 

[daveman]

See? More hate and ignorance. That's all you've got. Pure emotionalism driven by stereotype and a profoundly closed mind.

G'night, Skippy.

Really? I know of what I speak... do you? I've seen it first hand... have you?

25 years of experience out of love and caring for people your side considers to be "throw aways".

C'mon gutless... get off your ass and do something. Start your own business if you believe in Capitalism so much. Put your money, your heart and your soul where your big mouth is.

You won't. Because you know damned well you'll be slaughtered.

G'night slick.

It's rare to see someone so proud of his hate and ignorance.

 

[thereisnospoon]

IN practice, liberal don't believe in that definition. The laws are equally enforced now, but libturds are still continually whining about "fairness."

they are?......tell that to the kid in prison for 15 years for possession of an ounce of pot not eligible for parole until his tenth year, while some guy who robbed the 7/11 got the same time 15 years but was out in five for "good behavior".......there is equal enforcement for ya....

You're mixing issues.
DId the first prisoner behave poorly or well in prison?
Are those two people subject to the laws of the same or similar jurisdictions?
What are the sentencing guidelines in each case?
How well was the District Attorney's office funded in each place?
All of those questions must be answered to get an equitable comparison.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

That's all I ever hear about from the liberals, we want fairness. So, what exactly is that and how do you achieve it in reality. Fairness based on outcomes? Everybody gets the same paycheck regardless of skill or effort? Or fairness based on equal opportunity? Kinda hard to guarantee that, I would think. Suppose somebody fucks off, do you subsidize him anyway? Step up and explain how the concept of fairness works for you.

it doesn't get much more fair than it is , we have put retards in charge for 40 years, it will just get worse until we burn it down .

 

[thereisnospoon]

non sequitur.How much addresses no issue
The question no one on you side is willing to answer is "who gets to decide".
That question none of you will touch.

Who gets to decide? How about a Democratic vote on the issue?

No... you don't want that... because you know that your side would lose handily.

Let me guess... Your side wants the richest to decide for everyone... No one gets tax breaks... but the rich. The rich get to play casino with investors' money... until they lose... then we as taxpayers have to pick up the tab... but hey... it's CAPITALISM... right?

Wrong... you are a fucking idiot who would rather cut off the legs of one man to support another who doesn't give a shit whether you live or die.... and your vote doesn't mean a damned thing to him.... these are the people YOU support.

A democratic vote on what? Are suggesting a national referendum( unconstitutional) to let the voters decide a maximum income level and a maximum allowable level of accumulated wealth? C'mon, even you must know that is absurd.
The wealthiest do not decide either. Each of us as individuals get to decide how much we earn based on our efforts. That's the way our society and our economy works. If you choose to not participate, you don't get to sit on the sidelines and whine about it.
Typical angry lib response. I disagree with your socialist agenda so you, without
a legitimate rebuttal must resort to name calling. Perfect.
Now you may reply with more anger......And more absurdity.