- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,735
- 32,602
- 2,300
So because you suck at models they do to?In other words, you entire objection is based on your absurd political ideology and has nothing at all to do with science. Thank you for making that clear.And I'll put my disbelief that anyone what really has a master's ma chemical engineering can be a climate denier up against anything you sayI'll put my Masters Degree in Chemical Engineering up against whatever basket weaving degree you have any day of the week.
It's not disbelief that humans can affect climate, it's distrust of those proposing socialistic governmental control as the only solution, and it's distrust over the extent of the changes and the dogmatic belief structure of the AGW people.
AGW isn't science, it's a religion.
And I noticed you didn't respond with your "cuck studies" degree in rebuttal.
My objection stems from my own experience with models and statistical studies with regards to water and wastewater treatment. Add the exponential increases in complexity with regards to our atmosphere, and the typical AGW nut's devotion to socialistic remedies to the situation call it a healthy skepticism.
No, because I know models all follow the GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) concept I distrust those that cannot be directly compared to actual results.
When we model a wastewater process, we can then spend months with a pilot scale reactor to validate the assumptions, the input data, and the other parameters.
One cannot pilot scale the Earth's atmosphere.