Extreme weather events that show AGW

[Old Rocks]

There are now events that can definitely be attributed to man's influence on the climate.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Well, we are just going to tell that darn sun to cool it....
Solar min, solar max. < acquaint yourself...

 

[ding]

It seems extreme weather events are nothing new.

Top ELEVEN Most Memorable Weather Events - Farmers' Almanac

 

[skookerasbil]

There are a billion Ma. and PhD scientists that call b******* on any linkage between extreme weather and climate change. Too, almost unanimously meteorologists call any link a bunch of hooey.

Many times I've posted up a link in this form called The Chronology of Extreme Weather.... goes back to the 17th century and documents hundreds of extreme weather events.

But the climate Crusaders never want you looking at historical records on extreme weather because when you do, you end up splitting your sides laughing.

Maybe later I'll go find the link and post it up.... but these goofball extreme weather threads have become exceedingly boring.

 

[Old Rocks]

Really? Then why are they not at the AGU conference? Or at the AMS conference? And these people make explicit reference to the historical record. You sit there, covered in the slime of the worst of scientific ignorance, and spout how you know so much more than these scientists.

 

[martybegan]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

 

[Old Rocks]

Great, the next time you need major surgery, just hand the scalpel to your neighborhood auto mechanic.

 

[PredFan]

Really? Then why are they not at the AGU conference? Or at the AMS conference? And these people make explicit reference to the historical record. You sit there, covered in the slime of the worst of scientific ignorance, and spout how you know so much more than these scientists.

Because opposing voices, and opposing research isn't tolerated. That is the hallmark of that scam, and why it isn't true science.

 

[martybegan]

Great, the next time you need major surgery, just hand the scalpel to your neighborhood auto mechanic.

Different situations. Surgery is an exact procedure that requires training in a specific field, that gives definitive results in a set time frame. (Ironically the same goes for auto repair).

When a person goes in for gall bladder removal, there are no "mays" or "coulds" involved. The surgeon does not go in based on complex models and hopes for the best.

 

[martybegan]

Great, the next time you need major surgery, just hand the scalpel to your neighborhood auto mechanic.

Different situations. Surgery is an exact procedure that requires training in a specific field, that gives definitive results in a set time frame. (Ironically the same goes for auto repair).

When a person goes in for gall bladder removal, there are no "mays" or "coulds" involved. The surgeon does not go in based on complex models and hopes for the best.

You know man, these climate crusader people just have difficulty with abstracts.
..its just a fact. It's clearly a brain fuck up. Not an intelligence thing mind you but a thought processing issue. Most people don't understand that there is a difference.

They treat their beliefs as religious dogma. No evidence to the contrary would ever convince them.

 

[skookerasbil]

Great, the next time you need major surgery, just hand the scalpel to your neighborhood auto mechanic.

Geez....laughable analogy in this context. Actually, presents as rather incoherent

 

[Crepitus]

Really? Then why are they not at the AGU conference? Or at the AMS conference? And these people make explicit reference to the historical record. You sit there, covered in the slime of the worst of scientific ignorance, and spout how you know so much more than these scientists.

Because opposing voices, and opposing research isn't tolerated. That is the hallmark of that scam, and why it isn't true science.

Every major scientific institution in the world agrees that the globe is warming and that Man is the cause. There is no real dissenting research, only a few paid industry shills.

 

[skookerasbil]

Great, the next time you need major surgery, just hand the scalpel to your neighborhood auto mechanic.

Different situations. Surgery is an exact procedure that requires training in a specific field, that gives definitive results in a set time frame. (Ironically the same goes for auto repair).

When a person goes in for gall bladder removal, there are no "mays" or "coulds" involved. The surgeon does not go in based on complex models and hopes for the best.

You know man, these climate crusader people just have difficulty with abstracts.
..its just a fact. It's clearly a brain fuck up. Not an intelligence thing mind you but a thought processing issue. Most people don't understand that there is a difference.

They treat their beliefs as religious dogma. No evidence to the contrary would ever convince them.

Fascinating to me.... the thinking dynamic. Just so removed from the norm..... and most interesting these people really think that they're stuff is mainstream..... probably the main reason I exist in this form is to highlight this manner of thinking. It really is an anomaly....

 

[Crepitus]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

 

[martybegan]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

So Newton was right back then, everyone agreed with him, and so Relativity is wrong?

You make the false assumption that our current level of understanding of things is the correct one.

You also forget that large masses of people are just as capable of making the same mistake as a single person is.

Finally, when actual debate on the topic is stifled you can silence contrary opinions (even slightly diverging ones) via peer pressure.

 

[skookerasbil]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

Fail..... actually s0n, tens of thousands of Ma and PhD scientists call bullshit on AGW

 

[Crepitus]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

So Newton was right back then, everyone agreed with him, and so Relativity is wrong?

You make the false assumption that our current level of understanding of things is the correct one.

You also forget that large masses of people are just as capable of making the same mistake as a single person is.

Finally, when actual debate on the topic is stifled you can silence contrary opinions (even slightly diverging ones) via peer pressure.

Newton was not wrong, Newton was incomplete. He was absolutely correct as far as his model went.

 

[martybegan]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

So Newton was right back then, everyone agreed with him, and so Relativity is wrong?

You make the false assumption that our current level of understanding of things is the correct one.

You also forget that large masses of people are just as capable of making the same mistake as a single person is.

Finally, when actual debate on the topic is stifled you can silence contrary opinions (even slightly diverging ones) via peer pressure.

Newton was not wrong, Newton was incomplete. He was absolutely correct as far as his model went.

But there was consensus, so by your statement above Einstein should have been ignored because he added to or changed Newton's findings.

 

[Crepitus]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

Fail..... actually s0n, tens of thousands of Ma and PhD scientists call bullshit on AGW

LMAO!!!

No, they don't "son".

 

[Crepitus]

Now dumb fucks, these are real scientists, not the obese junkies on the AM radio that you worship.

Education and degrees do not confer the assumption of correctness.

When all the educated, degreed people agree on a conclusion it does.

So Newton was right back then, everyone agreed with him, and so Relativity is wrong?

You make the false assumption that our current level of understanding of things is the correct one.

You also forget that large masses of people are just as capable of making the same mistake as a single person is.

Finally, when actual debate on the topic is stifled you can silence contrary opinions (even slightly diverging ones) via peer pressure.

Newton was not wrong, Newton was incomplete. He was absolutely correct as far as his model went.

But there was consensus, so by your statement above Einstein should have been ignored because he added to or changed Newton's findings.

Lol, nice straw man. I said no such thing.

If you wanna have a real discussion then discuss. If you wanna try to pin some stupid "gotcha" on me then bugger off.