Environmentalists.. why do you want another Exxon Valdez?

[Robodoon]

Why are you supporting the higher risk of another Exxon Valdez?
In case you are too young..
The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989, when the Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker bound for Long Beach, California, struck Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef and spilled 260,000 to 750,000 barrels (41,000 to 119,000 m3) of crude oil.[1][2] It is considered to be one of the most devastating human-caused environmental disasters.[3]
Exxon Valdez oil spill - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So without the pipeline where the risk is 300 barrels in one mile of pipe.. Canada will ship the oil via another type of Exxon Valdez! 1 million barrels waiting to crash either due to bad weather or as in this case several employee errors...

why do you want 1 million barrels at risk versus 300 barrels???

People don't understand, especially most "Environmentalists" that the environmental movement of today is actually run by the oil men, who happen to be the international bankers.

They aren't interested in doing things for the people, they are interested in total control As long as they control both sides of the argument, they control the out come of the argument. Helgelian Dialectic.

The environmental movement of today is corp run, it has nothing to do with saving the earth, it has everything to do with controlling everything... IE UN AGENDA 21...which comes for the same source.

 

[Steelplate]

Why are you supporting the higher risk of another Exxon Valdez?
In case you are too young..
The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989, when the Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker bound for Long Beach, California, struck Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef and spilled 260,000 to 750,000 barrels (41,000 to 119,000 m3) of crude oil.[1][2] It is considered to be one of the most devastating human-caused environmental disasters.[3]
Exxon Valdez oil spill - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So without the pipeline where the risk is 300 barrels in one mile of pipe.. Canada will ship the oil via another type of Exxon Valdez! 1 million barrels waiting to crash either due to bad weather or as in this case several employee errors...

why do you want 1 million barrels at risk versus 300 barrels???

How many times you want to accuse people of this stupidity?