Emails, Clinton Foundation, Benghazi, etc...Still No Republicans Coming Close to Beating Hillary

[toxicmedia]

With the GOP likely nominations coming out, like Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, and Marco Rubio...and Fox News focusing on Hillary scandals 24/7...none of the GOP nominees are getting closer to Hillary.

I planned to vote Republican in 2016, no matter who they nominate (except Ted Cruz or Ben Carson) because I want to see the Republicans get an unopposed shot at governing.

I hope the GOP has more tricks up their sleeves, or we're going to see 2016-2020 full of vetos by the President, and more dysfunction in Washington

2016 Presidential Race
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 49 43 Clinton +6
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 45 41 Clinton +4
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 39 Clinton +7
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 56 39 Clinton +17
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 40 Clinton +6
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 53 41 Clinton +12
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 49 42 Clinton +7
All General Election: Bush vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 50 40 Clinton +10
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 40 Clinton +6
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 41 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 59 37 Clinton +22
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 42 Clinton +4
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 54 40 Clinton +14
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 522 RV 4.3 48 44 Clinton +4
All General Election: Walker vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 49 43 Clinton +6
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 42 Clinton +4
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 45 43 Clinton +2
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 55 41 Clinton +14
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 43 Clinton +3
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 54 39 Clinton +15
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 522 RV 4.3 49 42 Clinton +7
All General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 47 44 Clinton +3
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 43 Clinton +3
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 42 Clinton +4
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 39 Clinton +19
Rasmussen Reports 4/9 - 4/12 1000 LV 3.0 47 37 Clinton +10
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 42 Clinton +4
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 51 40 Clinton +11
All General Election: Paul vs. Clinton Polling Data

FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 48 41 Clinton +7
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 60 36 Clinton +24
Rasmussen Reports 4/9 - 4/12 1000 LV 3.0 47 38 Clinton +9
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 49 43 Clinton +6
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 56 39 Clinton +17
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 53 39 Clinton +14
All General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Polling Data

Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 47 42 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 37 Clinton +21
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 48 41 Clinton +7
All General Election: Huckabee vs. Clinton Polling Data

Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 45 40 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 39 Clinton +19
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 37 Clinton +9
All General Election: Christie vs. Clinton Polling Data

CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 60 36 Clinton +24
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 47 42 Clinton +5
Rasmussen Reports 2/28 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 47 36 Clinton +11

 

[Moonglow]

Red flags will soon be in play...

 

[Iceweasel]

Kinda shot your wad a little early didn't ya?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

 

[SwimExpert]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

 

[Sonny Clark]

With the GOP likely nominations coming out, like Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, and Marco Rubio...and Fox News focusing on Hillary scandals 24/7...none of the GOP nominees are getting closer to Hillary.

I planned to vote Republican in 2016, no matter who they nominate (except Ted Cruz or Ben Carson) because I want to see the Republicans get an unopposed shot at governing.

I hope the GOP has more tricks up their sleeves, or we're going to see 2016-2020 full of vetos by the President, and more dysfunction in Washington

2016 Presidential Race
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 49 43 Clinton +6
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 45 41 Clinton +4
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 39 Clinton +7
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 56 39 Clinton +17
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 40 Clinton +6
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 53 41 Clinton +12
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 49 42 Clinton +7
All General Election: Bush vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 50 40 Clinton +10
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 40 Clinton +6
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 41 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 59 37 Clinton +22
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 42 Clinton +4
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 54 40 Clinton +14
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 522 RV 4.3 48 44 Clinton +4
All General Election: Walker vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 49 43 Clinton +6
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 42 Clinton +4
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 45 43 Clinton +2
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 55 41 Clinton +14
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 43 Clinton +3
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 54 39 Clinton +15
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 522 RV 4.3 49 42 Clinton +7
All General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton Polling Data

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 4/26 - 4/30 RV -- 47 44 Clinton +3
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 46 43 Clinton +3
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 46 42 Clinton +4
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 39 Clinton +19
Rasmussen Reports 4/9 - 4/12 1000 LV 3.0 47 37 Clinton +10
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 42 Clinton +4
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 51 40 Clinton +11
All General Election: Paul vs. Clinton Polling Data

FOX News 4/19 - 4/21 1012 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5
Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 48 41 Clinton +7
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 60 36 Clinton +24
Rasmussen Reports 4/9 - 4/12 1000 LV 3.0 47 38 Clinton +9
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 49 43 Clinton +6
ABC News/Wash Post 3/26 - 3/29 RV 4.0 56 39 Clinton +17
McClatchy/Marist 3/1 - 3/4 514 RV 4.3 53 39 Clinton +14
All General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Polling Data

Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 47 42 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 37 Clinton +21
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 48 41 Clinton +7
All General Election: Huckabee vs. Clinton Polling Data

Quinnipiac 4/16 - 4/21 1353 RV 2.7 45 40 Clinton +5
CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 58 39 Clinton +19
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 46 37 Clinton +9
All General Election: Christie vs. Clinton Polling Data

CNN/Opinion Research 4/16 - 4/19 1018 A 3.0 60 36 Clinton +24
PPP (D) 3/26 - 3/31 989 RV 3.1 47 42 Clinton +5
Rasmussen Reports 2/28 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 47 36 Clinton +11

Good Luck

 

[Iceweasel]

HilLIARy is too right wing for obasm. He'll derail her effort and make it look like a right wing job.

 

[toxicmedia]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

How is she sinking?

She remains, through the worst Fox and the GOP has to dish out, still 5-15 points ahead of all Republican challengers.

The difference between Hillary and other potential Democrats now, is very different than Hillary VS other potential Democratic nominees in 2008. There is no Obama, with the potential to promote the concept of "hope and change". Elizabeth Warren does not represent anything new that Hillary couldn't bring to the office.

I'm surprised anyone would be arguing against the numbers. It's like you guys are seeing the "Hillary +10" or "Hillary +7".....in January 2015, and still in May 2015.....but you're just not seeing them or something.

Kind of odd.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

How is she sinking?

She remains, through the worst Fox and the GOP has to dish out, still 5-15 points ahead of all Republican challengers.

The difference between Hillary and other potential Democrats now, is very different than Hillary VS other potential Democratic nominees in 2008. There is no Obama, with the potential to promote the concept of "hope and change". Elizabeth Warren does not represent anything new that Hillary couldn't bring to the office.

I'm surprised anyone would be arguing against the numbers. It's like you guys are seeing the "Hillary +10" or "Hillary +7".....in January 2015, and still in May 2015.....but you're just not seeing them or something.

Kind of odd.

A month or two ago she had double digit leads over most....your own OP suggests she is sinking.

 

[toxicmedia]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

No...In March of 2007...

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 37 percent of registered Democrats said they would vote for Clinton as the Democratic 2008 nominee, while 22 percent named Obama. Fourteen percent went with Gore, and 12 percent backed Edwards

Dems favor Hillary Clinton for 2008 poll shows - CNN.com

 

[SwimExpert]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

No...In March of 2007...

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 37 percent of registered Democrats said they would vote for Clinton as the Democratic 2008 nominee, while 22 percent named Obama. Fourteen percent went with Gore, and 12 percent backed Edwards

Dems favor Hillary Clinton for 2008 poll shows - CNN.com

So.....yes. Yes it was the scene. Clinton out front, beating everyone. Gee, how did that work out for her?

 

[Jarhead]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

How is she sinking?

She remains, through the worst Fox and the GOP has to dish out, still 5-15 points ahead of all Republican challengers.

The difference between Hillary and other potential Democrats now, is very different than Hillary VS other potential Democratic nominees in 2008. There is no Obama, with the potential to promote the concept of "hope and change". Elizabeth Warren does not represent anything new that Hillary couldn't bring to the office.

I'm surprised anyone would be arguing against the numbers. It's like you guys are seeing the "Hillary +10" or "Hillary +7".....in January 2015, and still in May 2015.....but you're just not seeing them or something.

Kind of odd.

Not really odd. Hillary has had the greatest name recognition for years. All the average Joe, non political, middle America people heard about Cruz was "green eggs and ham". All they heard about Walker was his recall election. All they heard about Huckabee was his Evangelical approach. All they heard about Carson was....well....pretty much nothing.

And they are just noticing that cool sounding kid by the name of Rubio.

At this stage you can not look at "head to head".....I mean, heck.....most people struggle between Kerry and Biden when asked who the VP is. Most people only know a few names in Politics after the President.

At this stage, you need to look at Hillary's favorability, likability, and trustworthiness rankings to determine where she stands.

And those numbers are sinking.

 

[toxicmedia]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

How is she sinking?

She remains, through the worst Fox and the GOP has to dish out, still 5-15 points ahead of all Republican challengers.

The difference between Hillary and other potential Democrats now, is very different than Hillary VS other potential Democratic nominees in 2008. There is no Obama, with the potential to promote the concept of "hope and change". Elizabeth Warren does not represent anything new that Hillary couldn't bring to the office.

I'm surprised anyone would be arguing against the numbers. It's like you guys are seeing the "Hillary +10" or "Hillary +7".....in January 2015, and still in May 2015.....but you're just not seeing them or something.

Kind of odd.

A month or two ago she had double digit leads over most....your own OP suggests she is sinking.

Oh, I see how you're looking at that....

But what I'm looking at are the averages, on real clear politics.

You can cherry pick some of the polls if you want, but on the averages, none of the GOP nominees are within 5 points, and more are closer to 10 points behind.

This is what is new. You will not find polls showing anything like this since Reagan VS Democratic challengers in 1984

 

[toxicmedia]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

No...In March of 2007...

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 37 percent of registered Democrats said they would vote for Clinton as the Democratic 2008 nominee, while 22 percent named Obama. Fourteen percent went with Gore, and 12 percent backed Edwards

Dems favor Hillary Clinton for 2008 poll shows - CNN.com

So.....yes. Yes it was the scene. Clinton out front, beating everyone. Gee, how did that work out for her?

Wow...you just blurred the numbers well enough to achieve complete denial.

Clinton - 62.2%
Warren - 12.7%
Biden - 9.8%
Sanders - 5.6%
O'Malley - 1.6%
Webb - 1.4%
Chafee - .3%

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination

 

[SwimExpert]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

No...In March of 2007...

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 37 percent of registered Democrats said they would vote for Clinton as the Democratic 2008 nominee, while 22 percent named Obama. Fourteen percent went with Gore, and 12 percent backed Edwards

Dems favor Hillary Clinton for 2008 poll shows - CNN.com

So.....yes. Yes it was the scene. Clinton out front, beating everyone. Gee, how did that work out for her?

Wow...you just blurred the numbers well enough to achieve complete denial.

Clinton - 62.2%
Warren - 12.7%
Biden - 9.8%
Sanders - 5.6%
O'Malley - 1.6%
Webb - 1.4%
Chafee - .3%

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination

Are you illiterate?

 

[toxicmedia]

She's lost six points since March....sinking faster than a submarine with a screen door

How is she sinking?

She remains, through the worst Fox and the GOP has to dish out, still 5-15 points ahead of all Republican challengers.

The difference between Hillary and other potential Democrats now, is very different than Hillary VS other potential Democratic nominees in 2008. There is no Obama, with the potential to promote the concept of "hope and change". Elizabeth Warren does not represent anything new that Hillary couldn't bring to the office.

I'm surprised anyone would be arguing against the numbers. It's like you guys are seeing the "Hillary +10" or "Hillary +7".....in January 2015, and still in May 2015.....but you're just not seeing them or something.

Kind of odd.

Not really odd. Hillary has had the greatest name recognition for years. All the average Joe, non political, middle America people heard about Cruz was "green eggs and ham". All they heard about Walker was his recall election. All they heard about Huckabee was his Evangelical approach. All they heard about Carson was....well....pretty much nothing.

And they are just noticing that cool sounding kid by the name of Rubio.

At this stage you can not look at "head to head".....I mean, heck.....most people struggle between Kerry and Biden when asked who the VP is. Most people only know a few names in Politics after the President.

At this stage, you need to look at Hillary's favorability, likability, and trustworthiness rankings to determine where she stands.

And those numbers are sinking.

What about the favorability, likability, and trustworthiness rankings of the GOP challengers?

Honestly...what you're saying Democrats should be concerned about, sounds just like what Fox News and the GOP wishes Democrats were concerned about.

Right now, Clinton is sitting back biding their time, waiting to unleash the same teams that got Bill elected in 1990, when they need to. Right now they don't

 

[Anathema]

Toxic, ever consider that many of us on the Right no longer look at Elections as the means to change this country and are sitting at our reloating machinse or out on the range rather than at home answering stupid phone surveys?

 

[toxicmedia]

Wasn't this the scene in 2007 in Clinton v Obama?

No...In March of 2007...

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 37 percent of registered Democrats said they would vote for Clinton as the Democratic 2008 nominee, while 22 percent named Obama. Fourteen percent went with Gore, and 12 percent backed Edwards

Dems favor Hillary Clinton for 2008 poll shows - CNN.com

So.....yes. Yes it was the scene. Clinton out front, beating everyone. Gee, how did that work out for her?

Wow...you just blurred the numbers well enough to achieve complete denial.

Clinton - 62.2%
Warren - 12.7%
Biden - 9.8%
Sanders - 5.6%
O'Malley - 1.6%
Webb - 1.4%
Chafee - .3%

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination

Are you illiterate?

Oh, I get it....

You can't tell the difference between numbers, and letters.

I can guess from that, it'll be a waste of time to point out the difference between one number, and another number.

Turn Fox News back on so your world will make sense

 

[WelfareQueen]

Clinton is dead in the water. The latest WSJ/NBC News poll shows 50% of Americans do not trust her. Ouch!!!

Early polling such as the OP presents is strictly about name recognition. Oh course, he and Stat, and others of their ilk know this, but they keep putting out the same crap.

Bottom Line: Hillary's unfavorables are underwater and people do not trust her. The Hildabeast has got a real tough road ahead.

 

[toxicmedia]

Toxic, ever consider that many of us on the Right no longer look at Elections as the means to change this country and are sitting at our reloating machinse or out on the range rather than at home answering stupid phone surveys?

Adult beverages already today?...it's early.

I hope you're not threatening armed rebellion, because that's a childish reaction to losing an election. If you're capable of that, you should be behind bars or in the looney bin right now

The south tried that in 1860, and it wouldn't work if you tried it today. You'd just get yourself killed.