Doubts About Donald Trump's Own Medical Records Emerge

[rightwinger]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

Hillary is not 40 lbs overweight and sporting orange skin





X

 

[Pogo]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

Hillary is not 40 lbs overweight and sporting orange skin

Zackly -- talk about "obvious"....

 

[playtime]

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

People don't often change and especially when they are old.


People do change jobs all the time.


I have a buddy who worked his way though college delivering pizza.

Once he got a job in his field, he never wandered off from his job and spent the day driving around, like he did in his old job.


YOur position on this is absurd.

'People don't often change and especially when they are old.'

somebody better tell those delusional congress critters in the Republican Party that Drumpf is incapable of 'pivoting'. how many times has that idea been thrown out to the poorly educated right wingers , only to see him revert right back to his insane rants?

That's nice.

I noticed you still haven't addressed tribblehead's racism.... that's ok; I know you really can't defend it.

 

[playtime]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

uh-huh. which failed Benghazi hearing was it... #6? #7? where she testified for 11 straight hours with nary a yawn, but Drumpf complained that the debates... lasting 2 hours... were 'too long'? LOLOLOL!!!!

 

[idb]

I'll translate if I may...

"It depends on so many factors such as;

• Is he/she Republican?
• Is he/she Donald Trump?"

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

Nice try.

Oh well.

 

[idb]

I'll translate if I may...

"It depends on so many factors such as;

• Is he/she Republican?
• Is he/she Donald Trump?"

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

People don't often change and especially when they are old.


People do change jobs all the time.


I have a buddy who worked his way though college delivering pizza.

Once he got a job in his field, he never wandered off from his job and spent the day driving around, like he did in his old job.


YOur position on this is absurd.

So, just to be clear...
We can't assess what Trump would do as President from anything he has said or done before being sworn in?
But we know that Hillary will be a poor and untrustworthy President because of what she has said and done before being sworn in.

You really have to be limber to argue for the Republican candidate don't you?

 

[Bush92]

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

People don't often change and especially when they are old.


People do change jobs all the time.


I have a buddy who worked his way though college delivering pizza.

Once he got a job in his field, he never wandered off from his job and spent the day driving around, like he did in his old job.


YOur position on this is absurd.

So, just to be clear...
We can't assess what Trump would do as President from anything he has said or done before being sworn in?
But we know that Hillary will be a poor and untrustworthy President because of what she has said and done before being sworn in.

You really have to be limber to argue for the Republican candidate don't you?

No not really. Just truthful. Something Femocrats know nothing about.

 

[Bush92]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

uh-huh. which failed Benghazi hearing was it... #6? #7? where she testified for 11 straight hours with nary a yawn, but Drumpf complained that the debates... lasting 2 hours... were 'too long'? LOLOLOL!!!!

Sure. See Hillaryb"War Bitch" post.

 

[Bush92]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

Hillary is not 40 lbs overweight and sporting orange skin





X

Yes she is. She is disgusting.

 

[Correll]

The left's "perceived" Trump health issues are nothing compared to Hillary's obvious health issues.

Oh yeah? just look at my signature and tell me there isn't something wrong with the guy when he has the same behavioral patterns as a convicted serial killer.

You are a moron.

 

[Correll]

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

People don't often change and especially when they are old.


People do change jobs all the time.


I have a buddy who worked his way though college delivering pizza.

Once he got a job in his field, he never wandered off from his job and spent the day driving around, like he did in his old job.


YOur position on this is absurd.

'People don't often change and especially when they are old.'

somebody better tell those delusional congress critters in the Republican Party that Drumpf is incapable of 'pivoting'. how many times has that idea been thrown out to the poorly educated right wingers , only to see him revert right back to his insane rants?

That's nice.

I noticed you still haven't addressed tribblehead's racism.... that's ok; I know you really can't defend it.

Sorry, I've challenged a lot of liberals over the last couple of weeks to support their bullshit claims.

I forget which weak example you personally put forth. if I did not point out that it was weak bullshit already, please remind me which was it was again, and I will do so now.


Deport the illegals, bring back the manufacturing jobs, and STOP fucking with Russia.

 

[Faun]

Some conservatives are not taking Crazy Donald's flip-flopping lightly..

How Trump Betrayed Ann Coulter on Immigration

That article is a load of shit written by an asshole.

LOLOL

Stomping your feet and shaking your cane at the sky doesn't actually prove anything other than you're pissed.

You present the article as proof that some conservatives are not taking Trump's (your childish spin dropped, you moron) "flip flopping lightly.


Yet, that article is obviously written not by Ann, but by some one who has NOTHING but contempt for Trump, his supporters and Ann Coulter.


The majority of the piece is nothing but mindless partisan blather and the Race Card.


And at the end, it has ZERO quotes from Ann's response to this issue.

It ends up claiming that she is "minimizing" this "reversal" which is a direct contradiction of the article's main point.


The article is a load of shit written by an asshole.


That you found it impressive reflects poorly on you.

That you reject reality reveals much about you...

Ann Coulter Criticizes Trump's Immigration Plan, Blames Ailes

Nothing in that article addresses any of my points above.


"Coulter remains a loyal Trump supporter. “I can criticize my guy and still support him,” Coulter said. “Since the convention, since his speech at the convention, he has not made any mistakes until now.

“The media just makes stuff up, reinterprets his words, doesn’t show people what he says, lies about him,” she added. “He’s been magnificent in every speech since the convention. And I think he should just keep doing that.”

Of course it does. You're delusional to think otherwise. Your criticism of the link I posted was that it didn't quote Coulter, as though that invalidated the content of the link. So I gave you her own words in a second link, corroborating the first.

And I never said his flip-flop on immigration caused Coulter to give up on Crazy Donald. That's your strawman. I posted that to show he got soft on immigration, saying he will no longer deport all the illegal aliens -- which is what you've been supporting in so many of your posts.

 

[Faun]

You don't believe that you can judge a person's true future intentions by their past actions or statements?

Depends.

If the situation is completely different, and the motivation is completely different, and the expectations of those whom the person is answerable to is completely different,

than assuming that they will behave in exactly the same fashion is insane.

I'll translate if I may...

"It depends on so many factors such as;

• Is he/she Republican?
• Is he/she Donald Trump?"

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

So Crazy Donald would be an asshole president then?

 

[Faun]

All the brouhaha over Hillary Clinton's health has overflowed to a December 2015 letter that Donald Trump used to validate his good health. On closer inspection, Newsweek Magazine has noted quite a few discrepancies and because of that new calls for Donald to present evidence of his health are being called. The letter in question seems at best contrived and at worst fake. More to come on this subject for sure, I can't but wonder why Donald Trump would fake something like this unless there is something in his own record he would fear.

"A fake in the sense that Trump wrote it and his sycophant doc signed it:

On December 4, 2015, the Trump campaign released…something.

It purports to be a medical letter, but it is one of the most ridiculous documents ever to emerge in any political campaign. First, the letterhead is in the same font as the letter, which appears to have been created using Microsoft Word. The signature from the doctor is several inches past the signature line—the result you might get if the document had been signed as a blank and filled in later. The letterhead includes a Gmail address—something doctors tell me is extremely unusual, since doctors do not want patients contacting them directly by email as a substitute for scheduling an appointment.

There is also a website listed, but if you follow the URL (haroldbornsteinmd.com), it takes you to cdn.freefarcy.com, a blank page that asks if you want to upload an update to a Flash program onto your computer (the domain name,freefarcy.com, is still for sale. No, I can’t explain that.) If you decline, it does so anyway and, based on the response of the security system on my computer, the “program” on the doctor’s supposed website is a virus.

Then, there is the doctor who allegedly signed this document. His name is Harold N. Bornstein, and he is a gastroenterologist. This kind of physician is a specialist who treats the digestive tract. This is not an internist, who is trained specifically in providing full histories and physicals of patients. The letter signed by Dr. Bornstein, who did not return an email from Newsweek seeking comment, says that he has treated Trump since 1980. However, it mentions no history of the gastrointestinal problem that led the Republican candidate for president to seek out his help. In fact, the letter says Trump has had no significant medical problems. So why has he been seeing a gastroenterologist for over 35 years?"

read:Donald Trump tests positive for everything, according to his own doctor

What a massive pile of male bovine excrement! Trolling anyone?

The man has been his personal physician for 35 years and should know him well enough to write such a letter. He's said he thought about it for some time as he was riding in the limo and only typed it up on his laptop when a Trump aide asked for it.

You Leftists are really scraping the bottom with this.

You would expect Crazy Donald would know his name then.

 

[Correll]

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

I thought so...

People don't often change and especially when they are old.


People do change jobs all the time.


I have a buddy who worked his way though college delivering pizza.

Once he got a job in his field, he never wandered off from his job and spent the day driving around, like he did in his old job.


YOur position on this is absurd.

So, just to be clear...
We can't assess what Trump would do as President from anything he has said or done before being sworn in?
But we know that Hillary will be a poor and untrustworthy President because of what she has said and done before being sworn in.

You really have to be limber to argue for the Republican candidate don't you?

YOu are comparing apples to oranges.

My buddy won't be driving around all day when he is supposed to be making treatment plans, but he will remain the hard working and smart person that managed to work his way though college.


Trump is committed to deporting illegals. That will make MORE JOBS available for Americans.

He is committed to bring back manufacturing jobs. That will make MORE AND BETTER jobs available for Americans.

He is committed to NOT fucking with Russia. That will make the world a safer place.

 

[Correll]

Depends.

If the situation is completely different, and the motivation is completely different, and the expectations of those whom the person is answerable to is completely different,

than assuming that they will behave in exactly the same fashion is insane.

I'll translate if I may...

"It depends on so many factors such as;

• Is he/she Republican?
• Is he/she Donald Trump?"

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

So Crazy Donald would be an asshole president then?

If you consider his past behavior to be "asshole" then by your standards, then yes.


Just like HIllary will certainly be a Mega Evil Bitch President, by my standards.



But I am not looking at her past jobs, say as a lawyer and claiming that she will repeat her behavior there.


She will NOT take criminal defendant cases while sitting in the Oval Office.

 

[Correll]

That article is a load of shit written by an asshole.

LOLOL

Stomping your feet and shaking your cane at the sky doesn't actually prove anything other than you're pissed.

You present the article as proof that some conservatives are not taking Trump's (your childish spin dropped, you moron) "flip flopping lightly.


Yet, that article is obviously written not by Ann, but by some one who has NOTHING but contempt for Trump, his supporters and Ann Coulter.


The majority of the piece is nothing but mindless partisan blather and the Race Card.


And at the end, it has ZERO quotes from Ann's response to this issue.

It ends up claiming that she is "minimizing" this "reversal" which is a direct contradiction of the article's main point.


The article is a load of shit written by an asshole.


That you found it impressive reflects poorly on you.

That you reject reality reveals much about you...

Ann Coulter Criticizes Trump's Immigration Plan, Blames Ailes

Nothing in that article addresses any of my points above.


"Coulter remains a loyal Trump supporter. “I can criticize my guy and still support him,” Coulter said. “Since the convention, since his speech at the convention, he has not made any mistakes until now.

“The media just makes stuff up, reinterprets his words, doesn’t show people what he says, lies about him,” she added. “He’s been magnificent in every speech since the convention. And I think he should just keep doing that.”

Of course it does. You're delusional to think otherwise. Your criticism of the link I posted was that it didn't quote Coulter, as though that invalidated the content of the link. So I gave you her own words in a second link, corroborating the first.

And I never said his flip-flop on immigration caused Coulter to give up on Crazy Donald. That's your strawman. I posted that to show he got soft on immigration, saying he will no longer deport all the illegal aliens -- which is what you've been supporting in so many of your posts.

The first article was complete crap. It is alarming that that was not obvious to you.

I side with Ann on this one.

Trump's "softening" is being grossly exaggerated by the lefties,

AND, any "softening" is a terrible mistake.

 

[Faun]

I'll translate if I may...

"It depends on so many factors such as;

• Is he/she Republican?
• Is he/she Donald Trump?"

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

So Crazy Donald would be an asshole president then?

If you consider his past behavior to be "asshole" then by your standards, then yes.


Just like HIllary will certainly be a Mega Evil Bitch President, by my standards.



But I am not looking at her past jobs, say as a lawyer and claiming that she will repeat her behavior there.


She will NOT take criminal defendant cases while sitting in the Oval Office.

Why would she? She doesn't practice law anymore. Though she seems to have a pretty good record from when she did.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Stomping your feet and shaking your cane at the sky doesn't actually prove anything other than you're pissed.

You present the article as proof that some conservatives are not taking Trump's (your childish spin dropped, you moron) "flip flopping lightly.


Yet, that article is obviously written not by Ann, but by some one who has NOTHING but contempt for Trump, his supporters and Ann Coulter.


The majority of the piece is nothing but mindless partisan blather and the Race Card.


And at the end, it has ZERO quotes from Ann's response to this issue.

It ends up claiming that she is "minimizing" this "reversal" which is a direct contradiction of the article's main point.


The article is a load of shit written by an asshole.


That you found it impressive reflects poorly on you.

That you reject reality reveals much about you...

Ann Coulter Criticizes Trump's Immigration Plan, Blames Ailes

Nothing in that article addresses any of my points above.


"Coulter remains a loyal Trump supporter. “I can criticize my guy and still support him,” Coulter said. “Since the convention, since his speech at the convention, he has not made any mistakes until now.

“The media just makes stuff up, reinterprets his words, doesn’t show people what he says, lies about him,” she added. “He’s been magnificent in every speech since the convention. And I think he should just keep doing that.”

Of course it does. You're delusional to think otherwise. Your criticism of the link I posted was that it didn't quote Coulter, as though that invalidated the content of the link. So I gave you her own words in a second link, corroborating the first.

And I never said his flip-flop on immigration caused Coulter to give up on Crazy Donald. That's your strawman. I posted that to show he got soft on immigration, saying he will no longer deport all the illegal aliens -- which is what you've been supporting in so many of your posts.

The first article was complete crap. It is alarming that that was not obvious to you.

I side with Ann on this one.

Trump's "softening" is being grossly exaggerated by the lefties,

AND, any "softening" is a terrible mistake.

The first article echoed her sentiments and accurately portrayed Crazy Donald's softening on immigration reform -- which he now says there will be none.

 

[Correll]

You take a man, put him in a different job, with different bosses and different expectations and different motivations and different level of observation, when he is different,

and you expect the exact same behavior as in his last job?


Your above dismissal of my point was because you could not substantially challenge my point in any meaningful way.

Your position is absurd.

So, if that's your position then you'll agree that it's wrong to label Hillary as crooked, a liar and untrustworthy because she's never been President before so she'll probably act differently when in office.
Her past actions have no bearing on how she'll act as President.

Personality traits are very different from job functions.

An asshole in one job will still likely be an asshole in another job,

but he will be doing a DIFFERENT JOB.

So Crazy Donald would be an asshole president then?

If you consider his past behavior to be "asshole" then by your standards, then yes.


Just like HIllary will certainly be a Mega Evil Bitch President, by my standards.



But I am not looking at her past jobs, say as a lawyer and claiming that she will repeat her behavior there.


She will NOT take criminal defendant cases while sitting in the Oval Office.

Why would she? She doesn't practice law anymore. Though she seems to have a pretty good record from when she did.

She wouldn't. She shouldn't.

It would be literally insane of her to do so.


That was my point.


Trump, if he wins, will not be responsible for making profits for investors.

He will be responsible for serving the interests of all Americans.


And if he wants to be re-elected and/or to have a good legacy, and he will, he will do his best to fulfill his promises to his supporters.



To assume that he will not try to bring back manufacturing jobs because he outsourced in past jobs, is moronic.