Dolphins players take a knee

[Flash]

[



Bottom line is that they are exercising their rights, and if their manner of doing so gets under the skin of more "people" like YOU, more power to them.

.

You are confused Moon Bat.

You have absolutely no "right" to be an asshole in the work place. That is not covered in the Bill of Rights. Go look it up.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Two black guys. Who cares what they do.

 

[MaryL]

NFL: Colin Kaepernick thanks Miami Dolphins duo for kneeling during anthem

Colin Kaepernick has thanked Miami Dolphins duo Kenny Stills and Albert Wilson after they kneeled during the US national anthem on Sunday.

It comes after Nike decided to use Kaepernick as the face of a new campaign.

Kaepernick was the first NFL player to kneel during the national anthem to highlight racial injustice.


It seems to be impossible to discuss this protest in a rational way on this board.Clearly there are deep issues here that should be addressed but the reaction of the President and his attack dogs have made this impossible.

I dont know how representative the racist posters on the "race relations" forum are of America as a whole but it looks like the civil rights movement drove the racism underground and that hatred still exists.

Why cant the US leave the hatred in the past ?

Dolphins don't have knees. Fins, fins. Sporting events are not the best forum for political statements. Lets leave politics out of sports. You are black and make buku bucks, send all the excess income too various American school counties that can use the money instead of blaming racism. Ya think?

 

[Asclepias]

You made a blanket statement that "Protesting is not anti American".


THus, by that logic, you are defending "BLOOD AND SOIL!".


Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?

They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that.

Corral hates looking like an idiot which you just did by stumping him with your answer. He will deflect until he can recover.

HIs answer was stupid, as I quickly and easily pointed out.

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

 

[Correll]

And when they don't stand, and go so far as to do the opposite of standing, it says something.


It says they are anti-American.



That is the reality that you are in denial of.


Your insults do not change that, you race baiting asshole.

You insulted me first, and now you want to whine because I returned your gesture?

Fuck you.

Your opinion is just that. An opinion. It changes nothing, and they ARE NOT "Anti American".

Their protest is a RIGHT, because they ARE AMERICANS.

That's some "reality" for you to ponder.

You RACIST ASSHOLE.

An open letter from American military veterans in support of Colin Kaepernick

I was not :whining" about your insults, just pointing out that they are not a supporting argument, you race baiting asshole.


My opinion is supported by my argument, and their actions. Pretending otherwise is just moral cowardice on your part.


SUre, they have the right to protest. And if they choose to do so, in a way that reveals their anti-Americanism, they should be judged on it, and shunned by decent society.


Fuck you, and your false accusations of racism. I've done nothing to call for that shit.


I've read the letter. He is making the same mistake you are. THis is not about their right to protest, but about what they are saying, and how they are saying it.

Im not making a mistake, you RACIST ASSHOLE.

The law, is the law. And they are acting within their rights as citizens of this country. And just because they offend
a bigot like YOU, that does not make them wrong.

The open letter that I posted was signed by people who are REAL patriots that put their lives on the line to defend this country.

You are no patriot. What you are is a RACIST ASSHOLE who objects to socially aware black men who are protesting against unarmed black people being killed by law enforcement at a rate that is significantly higher than any other demographic.

That's your problem. And you are using the anthem as a defense mechanism to justify your racist belief system.

You are a shallow and despicable excuse for a human being.
And, you are a RACIST ASSHOLE.

1. You lefties call anyone that doesn't cow tow to your idiocy a racist, so consider your slurs dismissed, you race baiting asshole.


2. I've not accused them of a crime. YOu lefties keep saying shit like that, because you know that you cannot refute what we actually say, ie that they are anti-American assholes.


3. I don't give a fuck about their skin color, nor the skin color of the non black players that have knelt, nor the skin color of the owners that support them, nor the skin color of the league that supports them. That is shit you made up to support your false accusations of racism, you race baiting asshole.


4. And it is amusing to see you challenge my patriotism. You must be really desperate. I guess you don't really have many tools left once crying "racist" stops working.

ROFLMAO. More of your "leftie conspiracy" stupidity. This is not a left/right issue. There are sensible people on both sides, as well as people in the middle who support their right to protest as well as their right to NOT STAND. You see everything that you object to as something to do wth liberals and so called "lefties".
Silly and childish.

Anyone who can see through your bullshit "fake patriot" facade is a "leftie".

Anyone who can clearly see that your are a RACIST ASSHOLE who is using the anthem and the flag as an excuse to justify your racist beliefs is a "leftie".

You are more "Anti American" than the protestors. Because you're a RACIST ASSHOLE who objects to the black protestors making a peaceful statement. That is what you are offended by, and it is obvious. There are numerous real patriots out there who have gone to war to defend everones right to protest, which includes not standing if they choose not to.

And you are not one of those individuals.

What's REALLY amusing here is watching your hysteria over being seen for the fake patriot and and RACIST ASSHOLE that you actually are. That's not anything that I made up. I didn't have to. Your silly and unjustified indignation over a legal and peaceful protest is the proof in what you really are about.

Kind of like shining a flashlight on a cockroach.

NO, it's like a bunch of assholes decided to kneel during the National Anthem, showing disrespect to the Flag and the nation it stands for,


and sensible people noticed their actions and judged them to be, correctly, anti-American assholes,



and a lot of other anti-american assholes are lying for them.


YOu race baiting asshole.

 

[Correll]

They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that.

Corral hates looking like an idiot which you just did by stumping him with your answer. He will deflect until he can recover.

HIs answer was stupid, as I quickly and easily pointed out.

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

 

[Asclepias]

Corral hates looking like an idiot which you just did by stumping him with your answer. He will deflect until he can recover.

HIs answer was stupid, as I quickly and easily pointed out.

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

 

[Correll]

HIs answer was stupid, as I quickly and easily pointed out.

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

The question was asked the context of whether a protest could be anti-American, not whether it could or should be illegal.


THus his answer was utterly off topic.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

NFL: Colin Kaepernick thanks Miami Dolphins duo for kneeling during anthem

Colin Kaepernick has thanked Miami Dolphins duo Kenny Stills and Albert Wilson after they kneeled during the US national anthem on Sunday.

It comes after Nike decided to use Kaepernick as the face of a new campaign.

Kaepernick was the first NFL player to kneel during the national anthem to highlight racial injustice.


It seems to be impossible to discuss this protest in a rational way on this board.Clearly there are deep issues here that should be addressed but the reaction of the President and his attack dogs have made this impossible.

I dont know how representative the racist posters on the "race relations" forum are of America as a whole but it looks like the civil rights movement drove the racism underground and that hatred still exists.

Why cant the US leave the hatred in the past ?

Dolphins don't have knees. Fins, fins. Sporting events are not the best forum for political statements. Lets leave politics out of sports. You are black and make buku bucks, send all the excess income too various American school counties that can use the money instead of blaming racism. Ya think?

Why do you make a connectionbetween them being black and making a lot of money?

 

[Asclepias]

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

The question was asked the context of whether a protest could be anti-American, not whether it could or should be illegal.


THus his answer was utterly off topic.

Nope. You changed the topic the moment you asked him

"Are you really defending this?"

Now if you had said he was off topic before that instead of responding to the question like you did then you would have a case. Since you put your foot in your mouth you appear to be just as much of an idiot as I have come to expect.

 

[Correll]

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

The question was asked the context of whether a protest could be anti-American, not whether it could or should be illegal.


THus his answer was utterly off topic.

Nope. You changed the topic the moment you asked him

"Are you really defending this?"

Now if you had said he was off topic before that instead of responding to the question like you did then you would have a case. Since you put your foot in your mouth you appear to be just as much of an idiot as I have come to expect.

Nothing in that statement, implies changing the topic to a discussion of legality, or to anything else.


You are lying.

 

[Tehon]

Youre reply was a deflection because you were absolutely sure he was going to say the inbreds pictured didnt have a right to protest. I know for a fact you felt like an ass due to your reply. Its your tell. Youre an open book and a moron as well.

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

The question was asked the context of whether a protest could be anti-American, not whether it could or should be illegal.


THus his answer was utterly off topic.

The right of peaceful protest is guaranteed by the US Constitution. Protesting is inherently American, it is built into our preeminent law, your feelings notwithstanding.

In context we were discussing the right to protest. You tried to make a point and failed miserably. I don't agree with that group or their message but It is not anti American. It is their right guaranteed by the American Constitution.

Protesting is not anti American.

Are you really defending this?

They have a right to protest.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Dolphins players take a knee”

And the ridiculous right attempts to contrive a ‘controversy’ where none exists, by propagating the lie that lawful, peaceful protest is ‘unpatriotic’ – when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

Indeed, lawful, peaceful protest is the highest act of patriotism.

 

[Correll]

We were not discussing the right to protest but whether a protest could be "anti-American".


So, his answer was a dodge.


You are the moron here, not I.

You fucking idiot.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

Which was not the topic of the post he replied to.

He was dodging my point, like a cowardly liberal.

You asked him them this question you fucking idiot.

"Are you really defending this?"

Then he said this...

"They have a right to protest."

Then you couldnt believe how stupid you looked so you tried to deflect.

"Would you like to clarify your statement about "all protests"?"

Then he said this.

"They have a right to protest. I can not make it any more clear than that."

The question was asked the context of whether a protest could be anti-American, not whether it could or should be illegal.


THus his answer was utterly off topic.

The right of peaceful protest is guaranteed by the US Constitution. Protesting is inherently American, it is built into our preeminent law, your feelings notwithstanding.

In context we were discussing the right to protest. You tried to make a point and failed miserably. I don't agree with that group or their message but It is not anti American. It is their right guaranteed by the American Constitution.

Protesting is not anti American.

Are you really defending this?

They have a right to protest.

We both agree(d) that they have the right to protest.

THe discussion had moved on to your claim that "protests are not anti-American".


I posted a picture of some white supremacists protesters, and asked you if you were "defending" them, with your blanket statement that, "protests are not anti-American".


The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".


And then we would have moved the debate forward.


Instead you dodged, by replying to a question, that was not asked, ie was the protest pictured LEGAL.


And now, we are derailed into stupid word games. A common defense by liberals who have lost an argument.

 

[Correll]

“Dolphins players take a knee”

And the ridiculous right attempts to contrive a ‘controversy’ where none exists, by propagating the lie that lawful, peaceful protest is ‘unpatriotic’ – when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

Indeed, lawful, peaceful protest is the highest act of patriotism.

Like this one?

 

[Tehon]

The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".

I am being honest. I defended the right of the white supremacists even though I don't agree with their message. It is an American right. It is not anti American.

 

[Correll]

The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".

I am being honest. I defended the right of the white supremacists even though I don't agree with their message. It is an American right. It is not anti American.

I did not ask you if it was legal.

I DID NOT ASK YOU IF IT WAS LEGAL.

 

[Tehon]

The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".

I am being honest. I defended the right of the white supremacists even though I don't agree with their message. It is an American right. It is not anti American.

I did not ask you if it was legal.

I DID NOT ASK YOU IF IT WAS LEGAL.

How can something that is a basic right, granted by law, be antithetical to the society that grants that right?

 

[Correll]

The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".

I am being honest. I defended the right of the white supremacists even though I don't agree with their message. It is an American right. It is not anti American.

I did not ask you if it was legal.

I DID NOT ASK YOU IF IT WAS LEGAL.

How can something that is a basic right, granted by law, be antithetical to the society that grants that right?

YOu tell me. Do you consider this protest to be healthy for our society?

 

[Tehon]

The honest thing for you to do, would be to admit that some protests can be "anti-American".

I am being honest. I defended the right of the white supremacists even though I don't agree with their message. It is an American right. It is not anti American.

I did not ask you if it was legal.

I DID NOT ASK YOU IF IT WAS LEGAL.

How can something that is a basic right, granted by law, be antithetical to the society that grants that right?

YOu tell me. Do you consider this protest to be healthy for our society?

Yes, I do. It is instructive.