- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,095
- 83,754
- 3,635
Antisemite says what?
"Antisemite" is too kind. I've taken to calling them "Jew-Haters" but "Nazi Fucks" would probably be more appropriate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Antisemite says what?
People don’t seem to know this, but Trump cut off the money flow to the Palis because the Islamic terrorists were taking it to build rockets. Biden restored the funding as soon as he took office.Hamas is getting more money now than on 10/6.
Your response interests me because I posted back in Oct that Hamas had to be outside rational thinking because it gave Likud and Bibi precisely what it wanted. An excuse to take the land by running off the Pales and killing those left.Of course it does, how does genociding innocent Palestinian citizens HELP in getting the hostages?
I see more holocaust survivors starve to death in those three minute International Fellowship of Christians and Jews TV commercials they keep playing at every break.
People don’t seem to know this, but Trump cut off the money flow to the Palis because the Islamic terrorists were taking it to build rockets. Biden restored the funding as soon as he took office.
You know, I’m sure you’ve come to know me as a nice, Jewish girl - a little too sensitive at times - and brought up to avoid profanity, but in this case…."Antisemite" is too kind. I've taken to calling them "Jew-Haters" but "Nazi Fucks" would probably be more appropriate.
Absolutely. Obama and his puppet Biden couldn’t wait to enrich Israel’s enemy.Not only that, but Trump's sanctions on Iran put the kibosh on their financing of terrorists. It was assholes like Obama and Biden who eased the sanctions and freed up a buttload of money for the Iranians, who are behind most of this.
Gawd I miss having a real President.
You know, I’m sure you’ve come to know me as a nice, Jewish girl - a little too sensitive at times - and brought up to avoid profanity, but in this case….
Nazi Fucks it will be!
P.S. I can’t tell you how much I pray for a Trump win.Not only that, but Trump's sanctions on Iran put the kibosh on their financing of terrorists. It was assholes like Obama and Biden who eased the sanctions and freed up a buttload of money for the Iranians, who are behind most of this.
Gawd I miss having a real President.
Yeah, that fits my style better. Todah!Or "Nazi Bastards" if you want to be modest.
P.S. I can’t tell you how much I pray for a Trump win.
Thats not allPeople don’t seem to know this, but Trump cut off the money flow to the Palis because the Islamic terrorists were taking it to build rockets. Biden restored the funding as soon as he took office.
I know. Israel gives a tremendous amount to the people who want to destroy their own people.Thats not all
Israel transfers $1B to cash-strapped Palestinian Authority
Israel has transferred over $1 billion in taxes and customs duties it collects on behalf of the Palestinian Authority after a six-month hiatus in which the Palestinians had severed ties with Israel over its plans to annex parts of the occupied West Bank.apnews.com
Gd hears ALL prayers!I'm not one of the most devout goyim, but I was praying my ass off on election night of 2016.
Provide a link to a reliable source that shows any Pals have died of starvation.
I'm not sure why you would think a short news article citing Hamas Health Ministry numbers nor opinion pieces about AIPAC would be "credible". The least you might have done was cite the actual reports from the UN and UNICEF from which the information appears to have been selectively drawn. (Which is not at all to say that the UN or UNICEF are themselves reliable sources).Finally, you requested credible links supporting the fact that there are starvation deaths due to Israel's ongoing blocking of aid.
Please let me know what you think of two links I found. (6), (7)
I'm not sure why you would think a short news article citing Hamas Health Ministry numbers nor opinion pieces about AIPAC would be "credible". The least you might have done was cite the actual reports from the UN and UNICEF from which the information appears to have been selectively drawn. (Which is not at all to say that the UN or UNICEF are themselves reliable sources).
Here and here.
It might also be useful to take a look at the IPC (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) website for direct information on the many global crises related to access to food, such as the 600,000 in Phase 4 (Emergency) in Bangladesh, 4.9 million Phase 4 in Sudan, 1.3 million Phase 4 in Yemen. and the 1.6 million Phase 4 in Haiti.
Interesting to note that the entry for the Gaza Strip is PROJECTED based on "most likely" and "worst case" scenarios and "assumption of escalation of the conflict" at the time of the latest report (December 2023). I do wonder who decides on the "most likely scenario" for events yet to occur and how quickly-- or if-- those results are corrected.
The UNICEF press release even comes with a disclaimer: "Due to security and access challenges throughout the Gaza Strip, it is nearly impossible to collect anthropometric data to measure rates of acute malnutrition. Collection of anthropometric data (MUAC) was only possible in two areas (North Gaza and Rafah) among children under 2 years of age. The report therefore used an innovative method of analysis to support this data and determine that acute malnutrition is rising throughout the Gaza Strip."
"Innovative", huh? I can think of a few other words: made a guess, established a new protocol to be used only for conflicts involving Israel, maybe?
This is not to say that there haven't been some instances of food-scarcity-related deaths in Gaza in recent weeks--I find individual accounts of medically compromised children with very specific dietary needs to be especially credible--but this is like much of the discourse here on USMB which tends towards emotive language, exaggeration, and intentional misuse of language in order to demonize one side or the other, as well as a lack of understanding about credible sources.
Additionally, the two linked articles utterly fail to prove that the CAUSE of the food insecurity is "due to Israel's blocking of aid", and instead list a number of causes, correlations, and incidental factors, not the least of which is the conflict itself. The responsibility for both instigating this particular conflict and continuing it lies entirely with Hamas (release the hostages and surrender). I have yet to see any credible evidence that Israel is preventing or restricting aide.
This is perfectly clear. It is an odious statement. The problem I have is that you are using one emotional statement, yes, even by the Defense Minister, in the midst of an invasion, attack, and the commission of atrocities against the sovereign people of Israel as an indication that Israel, as a whole, either its government or its people, have an ongoing policy toward causing the starvation of the people of Gaza with intent and purpose to commit genocide.What part of:" No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel. Everything is closed." is unclear to you?
The objectivity and credibility of the humanitarian organizations IS in question. I would be happy to delve into that further, should you wish to pursue that line of conversation.“Oxfam’s report today shows how Israel is causing these horrifying figures, by deliberately blocking food and aid from going into Gaza. It has been using starvation as a weapon of war for over five months now.
I ask for credible sources and the UN and Pals are not credible they will say any lie against Israel.