do you people even know what the 2nd ammendment says ?

[Cecilie1200]

thats why the mexican govt has asked you to sort out your gun laws, most of the murders committed there are using guns bought in america.

Hardly, cow. The Mexican gov't. is trying to create a blind to fool assholes like you into blaming the US for their crime problem, so that THEY don't have to take the rap. And look, it's working!

Now moo for me.

 

[saveliberty]

We are trying to help Mexico. Gun sales are up!

 

[Cecilie1200]

so what, the army is composed of private citizens, so can people have a tank if they want too ? idiot

I believe you actually CAN buy a tank, if you can afford it.

decommissioned you can, not with the weapons system intact you cant. you can buy a figher jet too, but they take the rockets and machine guns off before you get it.

And now you're going to prove that, right? Or were you still deluding yourself that you could just make statements and have your word accepted? That doesn't work for anyone around here, and it goes triple for fucktards like you.

 

[Cecilie1200]

In 1939, the Court defined militia in US v. Miller. Might check Cases v. US also. If those cases have not been overturned by now they just may stand for our lifetime. Court hates to change its decisions.

1939? Try District of Columbia vs. Heller, in 2008. Join us in THIS century.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

This isn't rocket science, folks. My teenager could manage these Internet searches. Hell, my 5-year-old grandson could manage them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"The purpose of the second amendment isn’t to guarantee the right to shoot deer, It’s to guarantee the right to shoot at government if its taken over by Tyrants."

Andrew Napolitano | Tea Party Infidel

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All Libs can say for sure is that it's OK for Obama and Holder to arm Mexican drug gangs

 

[Katzndogz]

The Supreme Court has addressed this any number of times and they disagree with liberals who think they know better.

This isn't a matter of disarming the people. It's disarming some of the people, mostly law abiding people. The criminals will still have guns and unfettered access to guns. When the criminal enterprise is chosen by the government that the government sees a benefit in having that criminal enterprise armed, then they will have all they want. That's what Fast and Furious was all about. Getting firepower into the hands of the cartels that was superior to the firepower available to the border patrol.

 

[daveman]

Every time there is a tragic event like this, the "anti-gun" crowd comes out with more pure bullshit. The "gun" didn't kill ANYBODY. The mentally ill crazy son of a bitch that plotted this crime is what did the killing. He used a gun but he could have just as easily of used a baseball bat. Want to ban baseball bats too?

you know what, if I had a gun, and you were in the same room as me, Id probably shoot you right now, cause youre that thick theres no point in you, youre just a waste of time and oxygen and theres too many people in the world anyway. thats why people shouldnt have guns, in your country when people feel like that they can actually do it.

Violent elimination of conflicting views is a go-to solution for the left...their "final solution", actually.

 

[saveliberty]

Dave seems to be about five minutes behind me in posting. Someone say hi to him for me okay?

 

[Meister]

who were allowed to bear arms in their work with the militia once it was raised, the police force is also made up of private citizens, so is the air force so should everyone be able to have a stealth bomber ?

ps - there are no socialist policies in america and even if there were a gun couldnt protect you from them you fucking clown

Obamacare is a socialist policy fool. Whatch your mouth libtard idiot.

I have a degree in politics. you dont know what socialism is.

An obvious product of a government education.

 

[saveliberty]

Funny thing is, he thinks he's the only one with such a degree.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Funny thing is, he thinks he's the only one with such a degree.

No, what's funny is that he/she/it thinks that claiming to have such a degree on the Internet is going to convince people it exists, AND that even if it did, anyone is going to particularly respect it.

 

[daveman]

Dave seems to be about five minutes behind me in posting. Someone say hi to him for me okay?

 

[Oddball]

so what, the army is composed of private citizens, so can people have a tank if they want too ? idiot

The militia is comprised of private citizens, not the army...That's why there are two separate words to describe and discern between them.

You really suck at the English language, dontcha?

Why not personal nuclear weapons? What's having a mere gun going to do against the power of the state?

Just when I thought you've reached the limits of stupidity, you further push back its frontiers.

If you need the difference between personal arms and nukes, or even things like heavy artillery, 'splained to you, you're too far gone to even take seriously.

 

[racewright]

Obamacare is a socialist policy fool. Whatch your mouth libtard idiot.

I have a degree in politics. you dont know what socialism is.

An obvious product of a government education.

got it maybe we should get rid of schools,if there was no school those little children would still be alive??Schools only produce fools like this libtard any way.

Shore would help with the budget./I] Well if we can't get rid of them maybe we should regulate them HHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

 

[Colin]

Obamacare is a socialist policy fool. Whatch your mouth libtard idiot.

I have a degree in politics. you dont know what socialism is.

An obvious product of a government education.

Don't be fooled into thinking this fool has ANY education. The nearest he's got to anything to do with degrees is through the thermometer he shoves up his arse to check the temperature of his brain cell. Jeez! He starts a thread on the Second Amendment, which he can't even spell correctly!

 

[ABikerSailor]

it gives the right to bear arms to a "well regulated militia", not to people, not to individuals or home or business owners, that was to legislate for the raising of a police force. lawyers argued that you or your house or your family could be considered a militia, which is why you have guns now, but that was never the intention and its not even what the constitution says.

LOL...poor widdle liberal..never heard of "The Minutemen" have ya!



too funny.....

You DO know why they were called "Minutemen", don't you?

It's because they could fire a musket, reload, and fire it again within a minute.

I don't think the Founding Fathers were thinking about weapons that could fire 60-300 rounds per minute.

 

[Oddball]

it gives the right to bear arms to a "well regulated militia", not to people, not to individuals or home or business owners, that was to legislate for the raising of a police force. lawyers argued that you or your house or your family could be considered a militia, which is why you have guns now, but that was never the intention and its not even what the constitution says.

LOL...poor widdle liberal..never heard of "The Minutemen" have ya!



too funny.....

You DO know why they were called "Minutemen", don't you?

It's because they could fire a musket, reload, and fire it again within a minute.

I don't think the Founding Fathers were thinking about weapons that could fire 60-300 rounds per minute.

Preposterous.

They'd certainly want them in the hands of the Minutemen, if King George had weapons that could fire 60-300 rounds per minute.

 

[ABikerSailor]

LOL...poor widdle liberal..never heard of "The Minutemen" have ya!



too funny.....

You DO know why they were called "Minutemen", don't you?

It's because they could fire a musket, reload, and fire it again within a minute.

I don't think the Founding Fathers were thinking about weapons that could fire 60-300 rounds per minute.

Preposterous.

They'd certainly want them in the hands of the Minutemen, if King George had weapons that could fire 60-300 rounds per minute.

Unfortunately, that is about like Alexander Graham Bell being able to conceive the iPhone5, because having a gun that could fire like that wasn't even thought to be possible.

And no, the British didn't have weapons like that.

 

[Oddball]

Unfortunately for you, the framers were about a balance of power between the citizen militia and gubmint troops.

True story.