Do we owe Muslims another apology?

[Taz]

Let it be known that leftists are anti Christian charitable organizations.

Ya, because the GOP is so charitable.

Is the GOP a Christian charitable organization? Hmm.

All the people on the right are so charitable. Like the GOP and their minions.

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

 

[Taz]

He doesn't care about the truth. He's toying with you.

He is trying to anyways. Lol. He isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is though.

Let it be known that leftists are anti Christian charitable organizations.

Ya, because the GOP is so charitable.

You're confused. The GOP isn't a "charity". Do you need a nanny?

I cannot believe these people are so ignorant. Lol.

You're talking to a Jehovah's Witness.

What is your point? Do you have one. Oh yes, that's right, in short your point is . . . religion bad in every way. Lol.

He's calling ME ignorant.

 

[ChrisL]

Yet, most of the liberals around here will defend the Muslim religion while attacking American Christians. It's certainly bizarroworld.

 

[ChrisL]

He is trying to anyways. Lol. He isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is though.

Ya, because the GOP is so charitable.

You're confused. The GOP isn't a "charity". Do you need a nanny?

I cannot believe these people are so ignorant. Lol.

You're talking to a Jehovah's Witness.

What is your point? Do you have one. Oh yes, that's right, in short your point is . . . religion bad in every way. Lol.

He's calling ME ignorant.

If it walks a duck . . .

 

[BS Filter]

Let it be known that leftists are anti Christian charitable organizations.

Ya, because the GOP is so charitable.

Is the GOP a Christian charitable organization? Hmm.

All the people on the right are so charitable. Like the GOP and their minions.

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

 

[ChrisL]

Ya, because the GOP is so charitable.

Is the GOP a Christian charitable organization? Hmm.

All the people on the right are so charitable. Like the GOP and their minions.

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

 

[BS Filter]

Is the GOP a Christian charitable organization? Hmm.

All the people on the right are so charitable. Like the GOP and their minions.

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

 

[hobelim]

All the people on the right are so charitable. Like the GOP and their minions.

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

 

[ChrisL]

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

 

[ChrisL]

It is AT LEAST a neurosis and an unhealthy obsession.

 

[hobelim]

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

If you ran into some guy walking around in his underwear in a public park muttering obscenities, would you engage him in a debate about public standards of conduct and decency, or would you call those nice young men in their clean white coats?

 

[ChrisL]

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

If you ran into some guy walking around in his underwear in a public park muttering obscenities, would you engage him in a debate about public standards of conduct and decency, or would you call those nice young men in their clean white coats?

I'm just pointing out that everything (including religion) has it's pros and it's cons. It is not ALL bad. Even being a person who would not be considered a Christian, I can say that much! I come here and I read, and I get tired of all the BS.

 

[BS Filter]

Apparently so . . .

Religious faith is a central influence on giving. Religious people are much more likely than the non-religious to donate to charitable causes—including secular causes—and they give much more.

This chart holds all other demographic variables like income, race, education, etc. constant, so that when religious and non-religious counterparts are compared they are true peers in every other way. And the results show that persons who attend religious services twice a month or more give over four times as much as persons who never attend services.

We know the religious are also far more likely to volunteer. Among Americans who have volunteered within the last year, three quarters belong to a religious organization, one quarter do not.

Statistics on U.S. Generosity | The Almanac of American Philanthropy | The Philanthropy Roundtable

So, to try and vilify religious organizations and say that they do NOTHING good in this world is rather ignorant of you, no?

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

Sarcasm.

 

[ChrisL]

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

If you ran into some guy walking around in his underwear in a public park muttering obscenities, would you engage him in a debate about public standards of conduct and decency, or would you call those nice young men in their clean white coats?

Besides that, if you really believed that I should not be arguing, then what are YOU doing here? Lol! You don't argue here with the religious or the nonreligious about their beliefs or their lack of beliefs? Or are you just referring to Taz in particular?

 

[ChrisL]

Hating gays, blacks, transgendered, immigrants, the poor... Ya, so very charitable.

Squawk......squawk......Polly want a cracker? You forgot "islamophobia" and "homophobia". Better brush up on your propaganda talking points. Christophobic hateful bigot.

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

Sarcasm.

I don't know about that. A person who will refuse to see the good in something because he hates it so much is pretty much displaying blatant hatefulness regarding that particular thing, IMO. To say that Christianity has played no important roles in doing good in this world is just false.

 

[hobelim]

Disagreeing with implemented government policies regarding these issues and "hating" these people (who we don't really know personally) are not the same thing. It is pretty much impossible to "hate" someone you've never even met before, although you can certainly disagree with their views. The leftists just love to correlate disagreeing with hating. I disagree with a lot of religious views, but I do not "hate" them, unlike leftists who obviously hate them immensely.

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

If you ran into some guy walking around in his underwear in a public park muttering obscenities, would you engage him in a debate about public standards of conduct and decency, or would you call those nice young men in their clean white coats?

Besides that, if you really believed that I should not be arguing, then what are YOU doing here? Lol! You don't argue here with the religious or the nonreligious about their beliefs or their lack of beliefs? Or are you just referring to Taz in particular?

Just taz in particular. Haven't you noticed something amiss in your exchanges with him?

You might as well ask a guy who thinks he's napoleon his views on current events...

He is masturbating in public. You are just his inspiration..

 

[ChrisL]

"hate" is the current term the left uses for anyone that disagrees with their socialist big brother agenda. No one wants to be considered a "hater", so they label people with that term to try to manipulate them to come around to the leftist view.

Didn't you just accusing taz of being a Christophobic hateful bigot?

okey dokey.

I think that much is pretty obvious when one tries to vilify a charitable organization simply because it has Christian roots. Okay, maybe it is just insanity?

If you ran into some guy walking around in his underwear in a public park muttering obscenities, would you engage him in a debate about public standards of conduct and decency, or would you call those nice young men in their clean white coats?

Besides that, if you really believed that I should not be arguing, then what are YOU doing here? Lol! You don't argue here with the religious or the nonreligious about their beliefs or their lack of beliefs? Or are you just referring to Taz in particular?

Just taz in particular. Haven't you noticed something amiss in your exchanges with him?

You might as well ask a guy who thinks he's napoleon his views on current events...

He is masturbating in public. You are just his inspiration.

I hope not!

 

[GreatestIam]

I have to wonder why some of these people seem to have such hatefulness for Christians. Most of their neighbors would consider themselves Christian in one form or another. I am not religious myself, but I am not "brainwashed" that I cannot see the good that Christians do in this world. There are TONS of Christian charitable organizations out there who do lots of good for lots of people. Then we have the posters here at USMB who think they are "better" or something. Lol.

The good Christianity does has to be balanced by the evil it propagates with it's homophobic and misogynous teachings.

Helping the poor is good but women and gays have been discriminated against without a just cause forever.

You seem to have forgotten all the Inquisitions and murder that it took to bring us the Christianity of today, with it's genocidal son murdering God.

Respect that God if you like. I will pass.

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

I have to wonder why some of these people seem to have such hatefulness for Christians. Most of their neighbors would consider themselves Christian in one form or another. I am not religious myself, but I am not "brainwashed" that I cannot see the good that Christians do in this world. There are TONS of Christian charitable organizations out there who do lots of good for lots of people. Then we have the posters here at USMB who think they are "better" or something. Lol.

Jesus said the unbelievers would hate us because they hated him. What kind of people crucify a man like Jesus? They're full of the devil.

Yet it was God who decided to have his son murdered.

You are cursing man for doing God's bidding.

Regards
DL

 

[BS Filter]

I have to wonder why some of these people seem to have such hatefulness for Christians. Most of their neighbors would consider themselves Christian in one form or another. I am not religious myself, but I am not "brainwashed" that I cannot see the good that Christians do in this world. There are TONS of Christian charitable organizations out there who do lots of good for lots of people. Then we have the posters here at USMB who think they are "better" or something. Lol.

Jesus said the unbelievers would hate us because they hated him. What kind of people crucify a man like Jesus? They're full of the devil.

Yet it was God who decided to have his son murdered.

You are cursing man for doing God's bidding.

Regards
DL

Yes, so why did God have his son murdered?