Do any of you Dems want to see the Burisma Biden’s investigated?

[progressive hunter]

it didnt need to,,the act of having him fired did it for him,,,

actions speak louder than words,,

That’s your opinion. Not a fact.

You cannot factually claim that Biden bragged about stopping the prosecution as Trump did. Trump lied.

did biden ask to have the prosecutor fired, yes or no? come on big guy step out

Biden echoed the calls of EU, IMF, State Dept and many GOP Politicians in calling for him to be removed.

Shokin was investigating Burisma and it is very hard to know if Burisma was guilty or Shokin was just shaking them down for a bribe. Shokin had a history of this and was highly corrupt, he was shaking down anyone who didn't pay and a few who did.

I am willing to open all this up for investigation, If Trump would allow his dealing the same transparency... GOP are having none of it, I would suggest that this is a conspiracy theory to give there base something to hang on too.

did you listen to the video? he never mentions either. so you're factually incorrect. damn huh?

BTW, trump released the transcript of the call. in case you missed it. he didn't withhold anything.

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

 

[colfax_m]

That’s your opinion. Not a fact.

You cannot factually claim that Biden bragged about stopping the prosecution as Trump did. Trump lied.

did biden ask to have the prosecutor fired, yes or no? come on big guy step out

Biden echoed the calls of EU, IMF, State Dept and many GOP Politicians in calling for him to be removed.

Shokin was investigating Burisma and it is very hard to know if Burisma was guilty or Shokin was just shaking them down for a bribe. Shokin had a history of this and was highly corrupt, he was shaking down anyone who didn't pay and a few who did.

I am willing to open all this up for investigation, If Trump would allow his dealing the same transparency... GOP are having none of it, I would suggest that this is a conspiracy theory to give there base something to hang on too.

did you listen to the video? he never mentions either. so you're factually incorrect. damn huh?

BTW, trump released the transcript of the call. in case you missed it. he didn't withhold anything.

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown. The hold was placed hours after the phone call.

 

[progressive hunter]

did biden ask to have the prosecutor fired, yes or no? come on big guy step out

Biden echoed the calls of EU, IMF, State Dept and many GOP Politicians in calling for him to be removed.

Shokin was investigating Burisma and it is very hard to know if Burisma was guilty or Shokin was just shaking them down for a bribe. Shokin had a history of this and was highly corrupt, he was shaking down anyone who didn't pay and a few who did.

I am willing to open all this up for investigation, If Trump would allow his dealing the same transparency... GOP are having none of it, I would suggest that this is a conspiracy theory to give there base something to hang on too.

did you listen to the video? he never mentions either. so you're factually incorrect. damn huh?

BTW, trump released the transcript of the call. in case you missed it. he didn't withhold anything.

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Biden echoed the calls of EU, IMF, State Dept and many GOP Politicians in calling for him to be removed.

Shokin was investigating Burisma and it is very hard to know if Burisma was guilty or Shokin was just shaking them down for a bribe. Shokin had a history of this and was highly corrupt, he was shaking down anyone who didn't pay and a few who did.

I am willing to open all this up for investigation, If Trump would allow his dealing the same transparency... GOP are having none of it, I would suggest that this is a conspiracy theory to give there base something to hang on too.

did you listen to the video? he never mentions either. so you're factually incorrect. damn huh?

BTW, trump released the transcript of the call. in case you missed it. he didn't withhold anything.

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

 

[progressive hunter]

did you listen to the video? he never mentions either. so you're factually incorrect. damn huh?

BTW, trump released the transcript of the call. in case you missed it. he didn't withhold anything.

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

 

[colfax_m]

The call is only the start of the investigation as everyone one knows now. Each witness has said that this was far father reach than the call and there was part of a bigger shake down. Trump refused congress witnesses and evidence using executive privilege. No president really tried this before because it just drags the country through a lengthy process as he can get impeached every-time there is new evidence released by leak, SC or FOI. Trump has tried to block everyone of these avenues to the point where FOI is getting more info than Congress on there investigations.

That is simply obstruction and this is a question of US National Security. Why does GOP give Trump a pass on being a major security risk?

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

 

[progressive hunter]

well considering the call was a big nothing burger that would mean you have nothing left but your feelings

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

 

[colfax_m]

The call was the start of a shakedown.

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

 

[progressive hunter]

no it wasnt,,,

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Of course it was. The aid was put on hold immediately after the call.

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

 

[progressive hunter]

NO it was delayed before the call,,and it also wasnt a factor of the call

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

 

[colfax_m]

It was. Documents prove it.
Documents Show Ukraine Aid Freeze Ordered 91 Minutes After Trump-Zelensky Call

And Trump talked a lot about our help to Ukraine and how Ukraine needs to pay us back in the phone call so it definitely was a part.

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

 

[progressive hunter]

every witness so far has said it had nothing to do with it,,,

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Completely false. It had everything to do with it. It’s there in black and white.

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

 

[progressive hunter]

not according to every witness so far,,,

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

 

[colfax_m]

Also false. No witness said they were unrelated.

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

You’re going to need to use more than one word for me to know what you’re saying.

Was it a coincidence that aid was held immediately after the phone call and. It before as you claimed?

 

[progressive hunter]

none said they were,,,

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

You’re going to need to use more than one word for me to know what you’re saying.

Was it a coincidence that aid was held immediately after the phone call and. It before as you claimed?

thank you,,,

 

[colfax_m]

That’s a different statement than what you said before.

Saying it was unconnected is not the same as not saying they were connected.

Words matter. It’s obvious they were connected. Aid was put on hold immediately after the phone call. Tell me they’re unrelated and that’s just a coincidence.

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

You’re going to need to use more than one word for me to know what you’re saying.

Was it a coincidence that aid was held immediately after the phone call and. It before as you claimed?

thank you,,,

K

 

[progressive hunter]

yep,,,

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

You’re going to need to use more than one word for me to know what you’re saying.

Was it a coincidence that aid was held immediately after the phone call and. It before as you claimed?

thank you,,,

K

K what???

 

[colfax_m]

Lordy Lordy Lordy.

Just a coincidence. Sure.

nope,,

You’re going to need to use more than one word for me to know what you’re saying.

Was it a coincidence that aid was held immediately after the phone call and. It before as you claimed?

thank you,,,

K

K what???

sure,,,