Debbra Wasserman Schutz Lies About Misquoting LA Times Article

[Rozman]

These people are shameless.
I have more respect for used car salesmen and con artists
then I have for these Democrats who will do anything and more to get
Obama elected again.

She reminds me of that Monty Python movie where the black knight who
had his arms and legs cut off and was clearly unable to fight refused to admit it.

 

[blastoff]

Debbie gives JAPs a bad name.

 

[Rozman]

Maybe they can give Debbie an assignment to cover
the prostitutes that are going to work the convention.

 

[Papageorgio]

So when is a lie not a lie? When the Democrats play stupid. So pretty much always.

 

[WillowTree]

typical liberal

 

[WillowTree]

So when is a lie not a lie? When the Democrats play stupid. So pretty much always.

when they choose to be hypocrites,, "it changes nothing"

 

[skookerasbil]

She is a Disgrace, the Dems should be ashamed.

A real k00k..........she cant be on the airwaves enough for me!!! I want her fringe perspective on the TV 24/7 from now until the election. Only young single women embrace her crap..............

Go.......go...........go

 

[Listening]

She is as a big a whore as Stephanie Cutter.

She lies through her ass every time she gets on TV.

Cooper hammered her and she got caught.

 

[WillowTree]

how come her freakin adam's apple is sooooo BIG? she must not be a woman.







is that what the misogynistic liberal males used to say about Ann Coulter?













fucking hypocrites?? or wut?

 

[Mac1958]

.

Standard partisan bullshit: Deny, divert, filibuster, pontificate, distort.

Shameless.

.

 

[Listening]

Is the "personhood amendment" still part of the republican platform?

Yes or no?

Whether Romney wrote it (or not), he inherits it, en toto.

That is the issue (not mis-quoting the Times).

Bullcrap.

He is running for president. He established himself and his positions and ran against others.

He won.

You can bet your ass that if Michelle B. had won and the GOP somehow became pro-choice....she'd still be carrying the pro-life banner.

Romeny does not become the GOP.

Just like Bill Clinton did not become the liberal arm of the democratic party.

And it is foolish to think that the platform represents the views of everyone.

Blacks, largely democrats, helped defeat prop 8 in CA. And they are not necessarily pro-choice.

This is to much.

DWS is a classic Bob Schrum kind of "don't confuse me with the facts....I am telling you how it is" lackey.

 

[mudwhistle]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k-KuYJraEg]DNC Chair Torn To Shreds Over False Claims - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Papageorgio]

Is the "personhood amendment" still part of the republican platform?

Yes or no?

Whether Romney wrote it (or not), he inherits it, en toto.

That is the issue (not mis-quoting the Times).

Justifying the lie, what a good little Democrat. Here is your welfare check, now run along.

 

[Freewill]

She is a Disgrace, the Dems should be ashamed.

It is frightfully obvious that the only shame that Democrats could possible know is the shame their parents must feel.

 

[RoadVirus]

Does this woman ever shut up? Good grief Charlie Brown!

 

[rdean]

So why is the Akin Amendment part of the GOP Party Platform if they don't mean it? That doesn't make any sense.

 

[mudwhistle]

So why is the Akin Amendment part of the GOP Party Platform if they don't mean it? That doesn't make any sense.

The issue is if Romney is lock-step with the Akin Amendment....and he's not. Never has been.

Akin is a retard.

 

[Listening]

So why is the Akin Amendment part of the GOP Party Platform if they don't mean it? That doesn't make any sense.

That is not what this thread is about you stupid asshole.

It really does not matter.

The point of this thread is that this whore will say anything and lie out her oversized ass to get Obama re-elected.

Got it.

So why is the Akin Amendment part of the GOP Party Platform if they don't mean it? That doesn't make any sense.

The issue is if Romney is lock-step with the Akin Amendment....and he's not. Never has been.

Akin is a retard.

That isn't the point.

She's a liar. She is trying to create linkages that are not rational or true. She says Romney owns the platform. That is bulls**t. Parties fight over platforms all the time and he does not have to agree with it. End of story.

She's full of s**t. Her hair still looks awful. Cooper chewed her up and spit her out.

 

[Conservative]

Wasserman Schultz Refuses to Acknowledge She’s Misquoting the LA Times After Baffled Cooper Calls Her Out

Regardless of whether or not you agree with Anderson Cooper’s politics, the guy is arguably one of the last real journalists left in the mainstream media. During his CNN show on Thursday, the host proved that during his “Keeping Them Honest” segment where he ripped into Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) for “misquoting” a Los Angeles Times article in a fundraising email, in which she attempted to tie GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s abortion stance to Rep. Todd Akin’s. Akin came under fire this week from all sides for arguing that women’s bodies can prevent pregnancies in cases of “legitimate rape.”

Cooper was persistent in trying to coax an apology out of Schultz, but she remained defiant throughout the entire segment.

The email in question argued that the GOP “just voted to embrace Akin’s position by including a constitutional ban on all abortions — even in cases of rape or incest — in their 2012 platform.”

Schultz also criticizes Romney and his running mate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) in the email for “saying they don’t entirely agree with that plank.” Cooper then addressed the LA Times quote that Schultz used to make her point, which he says she “misquoted.” From the email:

“…but guess what? The Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that the platform was, and I quote, ‘written at the direction of Romney’s campaign.’”​

Those exact words did actually appear in the LA Times, Cooper explained, but Schultz took them “completely out of context.”

Now, here is the entire paragraph that was printed in the Times earlier this week:

There is no doubt about who is in charge, of course. Delegates for presumptive nominee Mitt Romney are voting down substantive changes to the platform language that was written at the direction of Romney’s campaign. The biggest question is whether the tone remains polite, as it was at the outset of two days of deliberations, or whether dissenters spoil the image of harmony that the Romney campaign is working hard to produce.​

You see, the Times article is saying the Romney campaign helped make suggestions for the GOP platform, but it makes no mention of abortion policy. Cooper confronted Schultz for taking the quote out of context to further her own political agenda.

“First, the abortion language in the 2012 platform, it hardly differs from the 2008 language and the 2004 language in the platform. That language obviously wasn’t written by the Romney campaign,” Cooper said, adding that a CNN reporter was present while the platform was being crafted and he said Romney advisers didn’t make suggestions on abortion plan.

“Factually speaking, Mitt Romney did not design or direct the writing of the Republican Party platform… you can’t say they designed the abortion section,” Cooper continued.

It seemed obvious enough that Schultz had been caught bending the truth to smear the Romney campaign. Surely she would apologize, right? Not even close.

“Anderson, we definitely can say it,” Schultz replied, then trying to justify her allegation by saying Romney has “embraced” the party’s platform. Wasserman Schultz Refuses to Acknowledge She

Yes, she is correct.. she can 'say' it. Her ability to say it, however, does not make it true. She is a lying little bitch, and hopefully the DNC drops her ass at some point.

 

[Listening]

Yes, she is correct.. she can 'say' it. Her ability to say it, however, does not make it true. She is a lying little bitch, and hopefully the DNC drops her ass at some point.

She'll fall like a rock right after Obama loses.