- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,330
- 142,215
- 2,615
We have two notoroious agenda driven 'doubters' who have not offered any reasonable explanations for why a guy with slightly better numbers and accolades would get 39 percent of the vote in his third year of eligibility while the other guy would get induction with 82 percent of the vote in his first year of eligibility.
So, with regards to your guys's doubts, I'll paraphrase Clark Gable__ Frankly bitches, I don't give a damn!
Because Smoltz was a better pitcher through most of his career
Shilling is comparing his career numbers to a guy who gave up four years as a starter to go to the bullpen. Smoltz was also a great reliever